great literature was at least still written and published in America:

All of the authors you mention have direct ties to the Cabal. I'm not saying their work had nefarious intent, nor am I saying that "ties" equals complicity, but those ties are there, and for some they are quite profound. Further, I can make a case that many of their works were used as a form of social engineering by the Cabal. Regardless of intent all of their work was all allowed by the Cabal, indeed, promoted by it.

None of those authors would have made it big without Cabal allowance or intent. That is the key to understanding the system. It isn't that "everything is evil" (though far more than you might appreciate), it's that everything is controlled by Gatekeepers. Everything is allowed by the Gatekeepers or it doesn't exist at all in the public sphere. Anyone can create anything within one of the allowed boxes (there are many). If it pushes outside of the allowed boxes, it is nixed.

The Naked Bible

I'll have to check it out.

 I wrote in the margin next to the Tsar's police statement "Proof?"

It was, according to history, written by Sergei Nilus. There is nothing that I have found that says he was part of the Tsar’s “police,” but he was a Russian and a member of the Aristocracy, though so was 99+% of everyone in our history books, so that says less than it might seem.

So did Allen Dulles "debunk" the Protocols by saying they were written by the Tsar's police? 

Dulles “debunked” it by saying it was plagiarized from a French work titled Dialogue aux Enfers enire Machiavel et Montequieu, 1865. Later that year Herman Bernstein, who was a disinformation agent for the Cabal, and who had a large influence on the history we got, wrote a book “proving” it a hoax, citing similarities between the two works.

These “debunkings” didn’t take, not because there weren’t some parallels between the two works, there were, but more likely because the parallels between reality and the Protocols were so incredible that it was pretty difficult to gaslight.

To put the idea of the Protocols to rest, they had a well publicized trial in Berne Switzerland, called the Berne Trial. This is the only reference I can find for the Protocols having ties to the “Czar’s Police.” As far as I can see on cursory inspection it was an accusation, not a proof. I don’t know what evidence they had to support it. I haven’t dug into this trial yet. I should probably do that. It would be interesting to see the evidence for both sides.

The reason I haven’t dug in is because it doesn’t really matter who wrote it imo. It is likely impossible to prove it was actually minutes from a Zionist meeting. From my perspective, what is really important about the Protocols is how eerily prophetic it is. Only by making it illegal to read (it was punishable by death in the Soviet Union to own it) can you keep people from reading it and coming to their own conclusion. It isn’t a convincing work because it is “anti-Semitic” (it isn’t actually anti-Semitic, it says explicitly that they use the Jews, their "lesser brethren" for their own purposes), it is convincing because it basically explains all of the evidence that one finds when one actually investigates history for themselves. Like, they make a statement in the Protocols, and when you go to find corroborating evidence it’s all over the place, and everything starts to make sense.

Regardless of original authorship, you can’t have something like that hanging around, thus it was a book that was literally (pun intended) put on trial in such a way that the entire world heard about its “debunking.”

It also set a precedence that said “no matter where you are, if you push this, we'll come after you.”

great literature was at least still written and published in America:

All of the authors you mention have direct ties to the Cabal. I'm not saying their work had nefarious intent, nor am I saying that "ties" equals complicity, but those ties are there, and for some they are quite profound. Further, I can make a case that many of their works were used as a form of social engineering by the Cabal. Regardless of intent all of their work was all allowed by the Cabal, indeed, promoted by it.

None of those authors would have made it big without Cabal allowance or intent. That is the key to understanding the system. It isn't that "everything is evil" (though far more than you might appreciate), it's that everything is controlled by Gatekeepers. Everything is allowed by the Gatekeepers or it doesn't exist at all in the public sphere. Anyone can create anything within one of the allowed boxes (there are many). If it pushes outside of the allowed boxes, it is nixed.

The Naked Bible

I'll have to check it out.

 I wrote in the margin next to the Tsar's police statement "Proof?"

It was, according to history, written by Sergei Nilus. There is nothing that I have found that says he was part of the Tsar’s “police,” but he was a Russian and a member of the Aristocracy, though so was 99+% of everyone in our history books, so that says less than it might seem.

So did Allen Dulles "debunk" the Protocols by saying they were written by the Tsar's police? 

Dulles “debunked” it by saying it was plagiarized from a French work titled Dialogue aux Enfers enire Machiavel et Montequieu, 1865. Later that year Herman Bernstein, who was a disinformation agent for the Cabal, and who had a large influence on the history we got, wrote a book “proving” it a hoax, citing similarities between the two works.

These “debunkings” didn’t take, not because there weren’t some parallels between the two works, there were, but more likely because the parallels between reality and the Protocols were so incredible that it was pretty difficult to gaslight.

To put the idea of the Protocols to rest, they had a well publicized trial in Berne Switzerland, called the Berne Trial. This is the only reference I can find for the Protocols having ties to the “Czar’s Police.” As far as I can see on cursory inspection it was an accusation, not a proof. I don’t know what evidence they had to support it. I haven’t dug into this trial yet. I should probably do that. It would be interesting to see the evidence for both sides.

The reason I haven’t dug in is because it doesn’t really matter who wrote it imo. It is likely impossible to prove it was actually minutes from a Zionist meeting. From my perspective, what is really important about the Protocols is how eerily prophetic it is. Only by making it illegal to read (it was punishable by death in the Soviet Union to own it) can you keep people from reading it and coming to their own conclusion. It isn’t a convincing work because it is “anti-Semitic” (it isn’t actually anti-Semitic, it says explicitly that they use the Jews for their own purposes), it is convincing because it basically explains all of the evidence that one finds when one actually investigates history for themselves. Like, they make a statement in the Protocols, and when you go to find corroborating evidence it’s all over the place, and everything starts to make sense.

Regardless of original authorship, you can’t have something like that hanging around, thus it was a book that was literally (pun intended) put on trial in such a way that the entire world heard about its “debunking.”

It also set a precedence that said “no matter where you are, if you push this, we'll come after you.”

great literature was at least still written and published in America:

All of the authors you mention have direct ties to the Cabal. I'm not saying their work had nefarious intent, nor am I saying that "ties" equals complicity, but those ties are there, and for some they are quite profound. Further, I can make a case that many of their works were used as a form of social engineering by the Cabal. Regardless of intent all of their work was all allowed by the Cabal, indeed, promoted by it.

None of those authors would have made it big without Cabal allowance or intent. That is the key to understanding the system. It isn't that "everything is evil" (though far more than you might appreciate), it's that everything is controlled by Gatekeepers. Everything is allowed by the Gatekeepers or it doesn't exist at all in the public sphere. Anyone can create anything within one of the allowed boxes (there are many). If it pushes outside of the allowed boxes, it is nixed.

The Naked Bible

I'll have to check it out.

 I wrote in the margin next to the Tsar's police statement "Proof?"

It was, according to history, written y Sergei Nilus. There is nothing that I have found that says he was part of the Tsar’s “police,” but he was a Russian and a member of the Aristocracy, though so was 99+% of everyone in our history books, so that says less than it might seem.

So did Allen Dulles "debunk" the Protocols by saying they were written by the Tsar's police? 

Dulles “debunked” it by saying it was plagiarized from a French work titled Dialogue aux Enfers enire Machiavel et Montequieu, 1865. Later that year Herman Bernstein, who was a disinformation agent for the Cabal, and who had a large influence on the history we got, wrote a book “proving” it a hoax, citing similarities between the two works.

These “debunkings” didn’t take, not because there weren’t some parallels between the two works, there were, but more likely because the parallels between reality and the Protocols were so incredible that it was pretty difficult to gaslight.

To put the idea of the Protocols to rest, they had a well publicized trial in Berne Switzerland, called the Berne Trial. This is the only reference I can find for the Protocols having ties to the “Czar’s Police.” As far as I can see on cursory inspection it was an accusation, not a proof. I don’t know what evidence they had to support it. I haven’t dug into this trial yet. I should probably do that. It would be interesting to see the evidence for both sides.

The reason I haven’t dug in is because it doesn’t really matter who wrote it imo. It is likely impossible to prove it was actually minutes from a Zionist meeting. From my perspective, what is really important about the Protocols is how eerily prophetic it is. Only by making it illegal to read (it was punishable by death in the Soviet Union to own it) can you keep people from reading it and coming to their own conclusion. It isn’t a convincing work because it is “anti-Semitic” (it isn’t actually anti-Semitic, it says explicitly that they use the Jews for their own purposes), it is convincing because it basically explains all of the evidence that one finds when one actually investigates history for themselves. Like, they make a statement in the Protocols, and when you go to find corroborating evidence it’s all over the place, and everything starts to make sense.

Regardless of original authorship, you can’t have something like that hanging around, thus it was a book that was literally (pun intended) put on trial in such a way that the entire world heard about its “debunking.”

It also set a precedence that said “no matter where you are, if you push this, we'll come after you.”

great literature was at least still written and published in America:

All of the authors you mention have direct ties to the Cabal. I'm not saying their work had nefarious intent, nor am I saying that "ties" equals complicity, but those ties are there, and for some they are quite profound. Further, I can make a case that many of their works were used as a form of social engineering by the Cabal. Regardless of intent all of their work was all allowed by the Cabal, indeed, promoted by it.

None of those authors would have made it big without Cabal allowance or intent. That is the key to understanding the system. It isn't that "everything is evil" (though far more than you might appreciate), it's that everything is controlled by Gatekeepers. Everything is allowed by the Gatekeepers or it doesn't exist at all in the public sphere. Anyone can create anything within one of the allowed boxes (there are many). If it pushes outside of the allowed boxes, it is nixed.

The Naked Bible

I'll have to check it out.

 I wrote in the margin next to the Tsar's police statement "Proof?"

It was, according to history, written y Sergei Nilus. There is nothing that I have found that says he was part of the Tsar’s “police,” but he was a Russian and a member of the Aristocracy, though so was 99+% of everyone in our history books, so that says less than it might seem.

So did Allen Dulles "debunk" the Protocols by saying they were written by the Tsar's police? 

Dulles “debunked” it by saying it was plagiarized from a French work titled Dialogue aux Enfers enire Machiavel et Montequieu, 1865. Later that year Herman Bernstein, who was a disinformation agent for the Cabal, and who had a large influence on the history we got, wrote a book “proving” it a hoax, citing similarities between the two works.

These “debunkings” didn’t take, not because there weren’t some parallels between the two works, there were, but more likely because the parallels between reality and the Protocols were so incredible that it was pretty difficult to gaslight.

To put the idea of the Protocols to rest, they had a well publicized trial in Berne Switzerland, called the Berne Trial. This is the only reference I can find for the Protocols having ties to the “Czar’s Police.” As far as I can see on cursory inspection it was an accusation, not a proof. I don’t know what evidence they had to support it. I haven’t dug into this trial yet. I should probably do that. It would be interesting to see the evidence for both sides.

The reason I haven’t dug in is because it doesn’t really matter who wrote it imo. It is likely impossible to prove it was actually minutes from a Zionist meeting. From my perspective, what is really important about the Protocols is how eerily prophetic it is. Only by making it illegal to read (it was punishable by death in the Soviet Union to own it) can you keep people from reading it and coming to their own conclusion. It isn’t a convincing work because it is “anti-Semitic” (it isn’t actually anti-Semitic, it says explicitly that they use the Jews for their own purposes), it is convincing because it basically explains all of the evidence that one finds when one actually investigates history for themselves. Like, they make a statement in the Protocols, and when you go to find corroborating evidence it’s all over the place, and everything starts to make sense.

Regardless of original authorship, you can’t have something like that hanging around, thus it was a book that was literally (pun intended) put on trial in such a way that the entire world heard about its “debunking.”

It also set a precedence that said “no matter where you are, if you push this, there will be punitive action taken.”

great literature was at least still written and published in America:

All of the authors you mention have direct ties to the Cabal. I'm not saying their work had nefarious intent, nor am I saying that "ties" equals complicity, but those ties are there, and for some they are quite profound. Further, I can make a case that many of their works were used as a form of social engineering by the Cabal. Regardless of intent all of their work was all allowed by the Cabal, indeed, promoted by it.

None of those authors would have made it big without Cabal allowance or intent. That is the key to understanding the system. It isn't that "everything is evil" (though far more than you might appreciate), it's that everything is controlled by Gatekeepers. Everything is allowed by the Gatekeepers or it doesn't exist at all in the public sphere. Anyone can create anything within one of the allowed boxes (there are many). If it pushes outside of the allowed boxes, it is nixed.

The Naked Bible

I'll have to check it out.

 I wrote in the margin next to the Tsar's police statement "Proof?"

It was, according to history, written y Sergei Nilus. There is nothing that I have found that says he was part of the Tsar’s “police,” but he was a Russian and a member of the Aristocracy, though so was 99+% of everyone in our history books, so that says less than it might seem.

So did Allen Dulles "debunk" the Protocols by saying they were written by the Tsar's police? 

Dulles “debunked” it by saying it was plagiarized from a French work titled Dialogue aux Enfers enire Machiavel et Montequieu, 1865. Later that year Herman Bernstein, who was a disinformation agent for the Cabal, and who had a large influence on the history we got, wrote a book “proving” it a hoax, citing similarities between the two works.

These “debunkings” didn’t take, not because there weren’t some parallels between the two works, there were, but more likely because the parallels between reality and the Protocols were so incredible that it was pretty difficult to gaslight.

To put the idea of the Protocols to rest, they had a well publicized trial in Berne Switzerland, called the Berne Trial. This is the only reference I can find for the Protocols having ties to the “Czar’s Police.” As far as I can see on cursory inspection it was an accusation, not a proof. I don’t know what evidence they had to support it. I haven’t dug into this trial yet. I should probably do that. It would be interesting to see the evidence for both sides.

The reason I haven’t dug in is because it doesn’t really matter who wrote it imo. It is likely impossible to prove it was actually minutes from a Zionist meeting. From my perspective, what is really important about the Protocols is how eerily prophetic it is. Only by making it illegal to read (it was punishable by death in the Soviet Union to own it) can you keep people from reading it and coming to their own conclusion. It isn’t a convincing work because it is “anti-Semitic” (it isn’t actually anti-Semitic, it says explicitly that they use the Jews for their own purposes), it is convincing because it basically explains all of the evidence that one finds when they actually investigate history for themselves. Like, they make a statement in the Protocols, and when you go to find corroborating evidence it’s all over the place, and everything starts to make sense.

Regardless of original authorship, you can’t have something like that hanging around, thus it was a book that was literally (pun intended) put on trial in such a way that the entire world heard about its “debunking.”

It also set a precedence that said “no matter where you are, if you push this, there will be punitive action taken.”