I think that the slow drip approach--although effective in many ways--has resulted in a hardening of the cognitive dissonance among so many (my opinion and theory).

I don't disagree, but there is contained in there another element; the slow-drip approach is a war of attrition. Each drip wakes a new set of people up. No one goes back to sleep. Even if that "wakey wakey" is only a nudge atm, people are being primed to see the truth when it's revealed (Precipice imo). Even among those who have had a "hardening of the cognitive dissonance," there are doubts being injected, even if they are being rejected. Some will never allow those doubts to be considered at all (4-6%?), but the seed is being planted for Disclosure to both occur and be seen instead of ignored.

Trump loses again via a fixed election, despite even the MSM polls showing that Trump is supposed to win. This wakes up more people, but it's too late... those who stomached the first fraudulent loss will finally snap.

There is a small window in there between "fixed election" and "finally snap" (a few weeks?) where the fraud can be revealed in an undeniable way. I personally think this may be a part of the Precipice. By itself I don't think it can be seen by enough, but in conjunction with other simultaneous or surrounding events, the fraud can become obvious to all.

except we might get very close with the declassification of the ugly stuff

It depends on what you mean by "ugly," but it seems to me we are heading in that direction (even if it's only going to be child sex trafficking and not the really ugly stuff).

The Precipice is reached via a collection of big, ugly things that cause suffering. Then it is finally revealed that 2020 can be officially proven as being fraudulent stolen, so that everyone attributes the Precipice to these traitor thieves.

I agree, I just think that a 2024 election "loss" may be a part of the "collection." I see no reason why it can't be, and it would be a massive red pill that makes people question everything. Possibly more than any other event imo.

I think overall your scenario 3 has merit. I do think the election is likely to be a part of the play, but I really don't think it will go smoothly. I don't see how people will wake up if it does. However, I concede that the window is narrow if it doesn't, which seems risky. But I also think whatever the Precipice(s) turns out to be, it's gonna be ugly, and a "risk of civil war" is certainly in that category.

I think that the slow drip approach--although effective in many ways--has resulted in a hardening of the cognitive dissonance among so many (my opinion and theory).

I don't disagree, but there is contained in there another element; the slow-drip approach is a war of attrition. Each drip wakes a new set of people up. No one goes back to sleep. Even if that "wakey wakey" is only a nudge atm, people are being primed to see the truth when it's revealed (Precipice imo). Even among those who have had a "hardening of the cognitive dissonance," there are doubts being injected, even if they are being rejected. Some will never allow those doubts to be considered at all (4-6%?), but the seed is being planted for Disclosure to both occur and be seen instead of ignored.

Trump loses again via a fixed election, despite even the MSM polls showing that Trump is supposed to win. This wakes up more people, but it's too late... those who stomached the first fraudulent loss will finally snap.

There is a small window in there between "fixed election" and "finally snap" (a few weeks?) where the fraud is revealed in an undeniable way. I personally think this may be a part of the Precipice. By itself I don't think it can be seen by enough, but in conjunction with other simultaneous or surrounding events, the fraud can become obvious to all.

except we might get very close with the declassification of the ugly stuff

It depends on what you mean by "ugly," but it seems to me we are heading in that direction (even if it's only going to be child sex trafficking and not the really ugly stuff).

The Precipice is reached via a collection of big, ugly things that cause suffering. Then it is finally revealed that 2020 can be officially proven as being fraudulent stolen, so that everyone attributes the Precipice to these traitor thieves.

I agree, I just think that a 2024 election "loss" may be a part of the "collection." I see no reason why it can't be, and it would be a massive red pill that makes people question everything. Possibly more than any other event imo.

I think overall your scenario 3 has merit. I do think the election is likely to be a part of the play, but I really don't think it will go smoothly. I don't see how people will wake up if it does. However, I concede that the window is narrow if it doesn't, which seems risky. But I also think whatever the Precipice(s) turns out to be, it's gonna be ugly, and a "risk of civil war" is certainly in that category.