why don't YOU name the SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS who are the "Cabal?"

I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out. That was my intent. I could have been more clear.

The real enemy is the Cabal. They use the larger groups as a shield. When you use the shield name, instead of the subgroup name, you give them the victory.

If we can show, for example, that 60%+ of all violent criminals just so happen to have black skin and male DNA, even though they are only 5%-6% of the total population, then that sets the stage for an important discussion.

Yes. But why is that the case? The answer is, that the Cabal is using targeted propaganda, laws, and the creation of a subculture designed specifically to create the environment where that happens. That is ALWAYS the answer (or close enough). Using any other name than "the Cabal" misleads away from the real enemy.

If we can show, for example, that the tiny hat club just so happen to follow a religious text that tells them they can do anything (literally) to anyone not in their group,

Only certain subgroups teach that as a religion, and only certain members of that subgroup believe it as presented, and even among those people, only certain people are aware of the fuckery behind those statements. Only certain people act towards that fuckery. The teachings are a form of propaganda. That propaganda is used as a recruitment tool. Those that are willing to take the next step move up the organizational ladder. It is the people at the top that are the real problem. Some of those on the lower rungs are also a problem. All the rest are simply the people who are victims of the propaganda.

THAT was my point. If other people cannot distinguish, so what?

Because it is an association fallacy. Look it up. That's what it is. Worse, it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions. Just because we can't necessarily say "everyone who is involved" doesn't mean we can't recognize the tricks that they use to hide, and stop using those tricks in our own statements which only aids in their advantage.

People might be indoctrinated, but they STILL are responsible for their own actions.

In WWII the Americans went over to Europe and killed a lot of innocent people (victims of propaganda). Included in those innocent people were many of the Germans, including the Nazis. Most of the Nazis were led around by the same association fallacy that we are here today discussing and that you are promoting. The reason the Americans committed murder in other peoples homes was because they too were led around by propaganda. Are they "responsible for their own actions?" Sure, but how responsible are they? They truly believed they were fighting for "good." SO DID MOST OF THE NAZIS! Instead, they were all different pieces of the Controlled Opposition fighting for the Cabal, doing exactly what they were intended to do to fulfill the Cabal plan. Their actions were evil by all accounts. So how "responsible" are they? Is it intent or action that makes a person evil?

Propaganda, generalization fallacies, all these tools of the Cabal create action through the creation of false belief which creates false intent. Who is really responsible?

Call the enemy who they are, even if you don't know their names. Do not push their false narrative by calling out the groups they use as shields.

No. Let's talk about BOTH.

Fine, just make sure you understand what the impact of your words will do. I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example. If I start with "the Americans did a bunch of evil shit and should be held responsible" it won't paint a complete picture of what happened. It is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it, made them believe that their actions were "right and true," and how they made them believe those false things. Only then can we see how belief guides action, and who creates belief and how. Only then can we really solve the problems, by first seeing who the real enemy is.

Just as there is rhetoric to deceive people, there is also rhetoric to censor people.

I object to both.

I agree wholeheartedly.

The "Cabal" is an important topic. However, it is not the ONLY important topic.

Well.... I think it kinda is. My research suggests that all mainstream beliefs have a direct connection to the Cabal. The Cabal runs everything, all sides, through targeted propaganda. If you understand that, nothing else really matters all that much. Nothing would be more uniting for example, than understanding that "the liberals" and "the conservatives" (or pick any two groups in opposition) are both having their entire belief system being run by the Cabal. Nothing would help people focus on the real problems than understanding that the real play of the Cabal is not contained in where the "opposite" groups disagree, but in where they agree; in the areas that no one talks about at all.

If we learn to direct our focus on the real enemy, we win the real war, not the fake one they create to distract us.

why don't YOU name the SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS who are the "Cabal?"

I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out. That was my intent. I could have been more clear.

The real enemy is the Cabal. They use the larger groups as a shield. When you use the shield name, instead of the subgroup name, you give them the victory.

If we can show, for example, that 60%+ of all violent criminals just so happen to have black skin and male DNA, even though they are only 5%-6% of the total population, then that sets the stage for an important discussion.

Yes. But why is that the case? The answer is, that the Cabal is using targeted propaganda, laws, and the creation of a subculture designed specifically to create the environment where that happens. That is ALWAYS the answer (or close enough). Using any other name than "the Cabal" misleads away from the real enemy.

If we can show, for example, that the tiny hat club just so happen to follow a religious text that tells them they can do anything (literally) to anyone not in their group,

Only certain subgroups teach that as a religion, and only certain members of that subgroup believe it as presented, and even among those people, only certain people are aware of the fuckery behind those statements. Only certain people act towards that fuckery. The teachings are a form of propaganda. That propaganda is used as a recruitment tool. Those that are willing to take the next step move up the organizational ladder. It is the people at the top that are the real problem. Some of those on the lower rungs are also a problem. All the rest are simply the people who are victims of the propaganda.

THAT was my point. If other people cannot distinguish, so what?

Because it is an association fallacy. Look it up. That's what it is. Worse, it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions. Just because we can't necessarily say "everyone who is involved" doesn't mean we can't recognize the tricks that they use to hide, and stop using those tricks in our own statements which only aids in their advantage.

People might be indoctrinated, but they STILL are responsible for their own actions.

In WWII the Americans went over to Europe and killed a lot of innocent people (victims of propaganda). Included in those innocent people were many of the Germans, including the Nazis. Most of the Nazis were led around by the same association fallacy that we are here today discussing and that you are promoting. The reason the Americans committed murder in other peoples homes was because they too were led around by propaganda. Are they "responsible for their own actions?" Sure, but how responsible are they? They truly believed they were fighting for "good." SO DID MOST OF THE NAZIS! Instead, they were all different pieces of the Controlled Opposition fighting for the Cabal, doing exactly what they were intended to do to fulfill the Cabal plan. Their actions were evil by all accounts. So how "responsible" are they? Is it intent or action that makes a person evil?

Propaganda, generalization fallacies, all these tools of the Cabal create action through the creation of false belief which creates false intent. Who is really responsible?

Call the enemy who they are, even if you don't know their names. Do not push their false narrative by calling out the groups they use as shields.

No. Let's talk about BOTH.

Fine, just make sure you understand what the impact of your words will do. I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example. If I start with "the Americans did a bunch of evil shit and should be held responsible" it won't paint a complete picture of what happened. It is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it, made them believe that their actions were "right and true," and how they made them believe those false things. Only then can we see how belief guides action, and who creates belief and how.

Just as there is rhetoric to deceive people, there is also rhetoric to censor people.

I object to both.

I agree wholeheartedly.

The "Cabal" is an important topic. However, it is not the ONLY important topic.

Well.... I think it kinda is. My research suggests that all mainstream beliefs have a direct connection to the Cabal. The Cabal runs everything, all sides, through targeted propaganda. If you understand that, nothing else really matters all that much. Nothing would be more uniting for example, than understanding that "the liberals" and "the conservatives" (or pick any two groups in opposition) are both having their entire belief system being run by the Cabal. Nothing would help people focus on the real problems than understanding that the real play of the Cabal is not contained in where the "opposite" groups disagree, but in where they agree; in the areas that no one talks about at all.

If we learn to direct our focus on the real enemy, we win the real war, not the fake one they create to distract us.

why don't YOU name the SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS who are the "Cabal?"

I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out. That was my intent. I could have been more clear.

The real enemy is the Cabal. They use the larger groups as a shield. When you use the shield name, instead of the subgroup name, you give them the victory.

If we can show, for example, that 60%+ of all violent criminals just so happen to have black skin and male DNA, even though they are only 5%-6% of the total population, then that sets the stage for an important discussion.

Yes. But why is that the case? The answer is, that the Cabal is using targeted propaganda, laws, and the creation of a subculture designed specifically to create the environment where that happens. That is ALWAYS the answer (or close enough). Using any other name than "the Cabal" misleads away from the real enemy.

If we can show, for example, that the tiny hat club just so happen to follow a religious text that tells them they can do anything (literally) to anyone not in their group,

Only certain subgroups teach that as a religion, and only certain members of that subgroup believe it as presented, and even among those people, only certain people are aware of the fuckery behind those statements. Only certain people act towards that fuckery. The teachings are a form of propaganda. That propaganda is used as a recruitment tool. Those that are willing to take the next step move up the organizational ladder. It is the people at the top that are the real problem. Some of those on the lower rungs are also a problem. All the rest are simply the people who are victims of the propaganda.

THAT was my point. If other people cannot distinguish, so what?

Because it is an association fallacy. Look it up. That's what it is. Worse, it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions. Just because we can't necessarily say "everyone who is involved" doesn't mean we can't recognize the tricks that they use to hide, and stop using those tricks in our own statements which only aids in their advantage.

People might be indoctrinated, but they STILL are responsible for their own actions.

In WWII the Americans went over to Europe and killed a lot of innocent people (victims of propaganda). Included in those innocent people were many of the Germans, including the Nazis. Most of the Nazis were led around by the same association fallacy that we are here today discussing and that you are promoting. The reason the Americans committed murder in other peoples homes was because they too were led around by propaganda. Are they "responsible for their own actions?" Sure, but how responsible are they? They truly believed they were fighting for "good." SO DID MOST OF THE NAZIS! Instead, they were all different pieces of the Controlled Opposition fighting for the Cabal, doing exactly what they were intended to do to fulfill the Cabal plan. Their actions were evil by all accounts. So how "responsible" are they? Is it intent or action that makes a person evil?

Propaganda, generalization fallacies, all these tools of the Cabal create action through the creation of false belief which creates false intent. Who is really responsible?

Call the enemy who they are, even if you don't know their names. Do not push their false narrative by calling out the groups they use as shields.

No. Let's talk about BOTH.

Fine, just make sure you understand what the impact of your words will do. I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example, but it is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it, made them believe that their actions were "right and true," and how they made them believe those false things. Only then can we see how belief guides action, and who creates belief and how.

Just as there is rhetoric to deceive people, there is also rhetoric to censor people.

I object to both.

I agree wholeheartedly.

The "Cabal" is an important topic. However, it is not the ONLY important topic.

Well.... I think it kinda is. My research suggests that all mainstream beliefs have a direct connection to the Cabal. The Cabal runs everything, all sides, through targeted propaganda. If you understand that, nothing else really matters all that much. Nothing would be more uniting for example, than understanding that "the liberals" and "the conservatives" (or pick any two groups in opposition) are both having their entire belief system being run by the Cabal. Nothing would help people focus on the real problems than understanding that the real play of the Cabal is not contained in where the "opposite" groups disagree, but in where they agree; in the areas that no one talks about at all.

If we learn to direct our focus on the real enemy, we win the real war, not the fake one they create to distract us.

why don't YOU name the SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS who are the "Cabal?"

I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out. That was my intent. I could have been more clear.

The real enemy is the Cabal. They use the larger groups as a shield. When you use the shield name, instead of the subgroup name, you give them the victory.

If we can show, for example, that 60%+ of all violent criminals just so happen to have black skin and male DNA, even though they are only 5%-6% of the total population, then that sets the stage for an important discussion.

Yes. But why is that the case? The answer is, that the Cabal is using targeted propaganda, laws, and the creation of a subculture designed specifically to create the environment where that happens. That is ALWAYS the answer (or close enough). Using any other name than "the Cabal" misleads away from the real enemy.

If we can show, for example, that the tiny hat club just so happen to follow a religious text that tells them they can do anything (literally) to anyone not in their group,

Only certain subgroups teach that as a religion, and only certain members of that subgroup believe it as presented, and even among those people, only certain people are aware of the fuckery behind those statements. Only certain people act towards that fuckery. The teachings are a form of propaganda. That propaganda is used as a recruitment tool. Those that are willing to take the next step move up the organizational ladder. It is the people at the top that are the real problem. Some of those on the lower rungs are also a problem. All the rest are simply the people who are victims of the propaganda.

THAT was my point. If other people cannot distinguish, so what?

Because it is an association fallacy. Look it up. That's what it is. Worse, it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions. Just because we can't necessarily say "everyone who is involved" doesn't mean we can't recognize the tricks that they use to hide, and stop using those tricks in our own statements which only aids in their advantage.

People might be indoctrinated, but they STILL are responsible for their own actions.

In WWII the Americans went over to Europe and killed a lot of innocent people (victims of propaganda). Included in those innocent people were many of the Germans, including the Nazis. Most of the Nazis were led around by the same association fallacy that we are here today discussing and that you are promoting. The reason the Americans committed murder in other peoples homes was because they too were led around by propaganda. Are they "responsible for their own actions?" Sure, but how responsible are they? They truly believed they were fighting for "good." SO DID MOST OF THE NAZIS! Instead, they were all different pieces of the Controlled Opposition fighting for the Cabal, doing exactly what they were intended to do to fulfill the Cabal plan. Their actions were evil by all accounts. So how "responsible" are they? Is it intent or action that makes a person evil?

Propaganda, generalization fallacies, all these tools of the Cabal create action through the creation of false belief through false intent. Who is really responsible?

Call the enemy who they are, even if you don't know their names. Do not push their false narrative by calling out the groups they use as shields.

No. Let's talk about BOTH.

Fine, just make sure you understand what the impact of your words will do. I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example, but it is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it, made them believe that their actions were "right and true," and how they made them believe those false things. Only then can we see how belief guides action, and who creates belief and how.

Just as there is rhetoric to deceive people, there is also rhetoric to censor people.

I object to both.

I agree wholeheartedly.

The "Cabal" is an important topic. However, it is not the ONLY important topic.

Well.... I think it kinda is. My research suggests that all mainstream beliefs have a direct connection to the Cabal. The Cabal runs everything, all sides, through targeted propaganda. If you understand that, nothing else really matters all that much. Nothing would be more uniting for example, than understanding that "the liberals" and "the conservatives" (or pick any two groups in opposition) are both having their entire belief system being run by the Cabal. Nothing would help people focus on the real problems than understanding that the real play of the Cabal is not contained in where the "opposite" groups disagree, but in where they agree; in the areas that no one talks about at all.

If we learn to direct our focus on the real enemy, we win the real war, not the fake one they create to distract us.

why don't YOU name the SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS who are the "Cabal?"

I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out. That was my intent. The real enemy is the Cabal. They use the larger groups as a shield. When you use the shield name, instead of the subgroup name, you give them the victory.

If we can show, for example, that 60%+ of all violent criminals just so happen to have black skin and male DNA, even though they are only 5%-6% of the total population, then that sets the stage for an important discussion.

Yes. But why is that the case? The answer is, that the Cabal is using targeted propaganda, laws, and the creation of a subculture designed specifically to create the environment where that happens. That is ALWAYS the answer (or close enough). Using any other name than "the Cabal" misleads away from the real enemy.

If we can show, for example, that the tiny hat club just so happen to follow a religious text that tells them they can do anything (literally) to anyone not in their group,

Only certain subgroups teach that as a religion, and only certain members of that subgroup believe it as presented, and even among those people, only certain people are aware of the fuckery behind those statements. Only certain people act towards that fuckery. The teachings are a form of propaganda. That propaganda is used as a recruitment tool. Those that are willing to take the next step move up the organizational ladder. It is the people at the top that are the real problem. Some of those on the lower rungs are also a problem. All the rest are simply the people who are victims of the propaganda.

THAT was my point. If other people cannot distinguish, so what?

Because it is an association fallacy. Look it up. That's what it is. Worse, it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions. Just because we can't necessarily say "everyone who is involved" doesn't mean we can't recognize the tricks that they use to hide, and stop using those tricks in our own statements which only aids in their advantage.

People might be indoctrinated, but they STILL are responsible for their own actions.

In WWII the Americans went over to Europe and killed a lot of innocent people (victims of propaganda). Included in those innocent people were many of the Germans, including the Nazis. Most of the Nazis were led around by the same association fallacy that we are here today discussing and that you are promoting. The reason the Americans committed murder in other peoples homes was because they too were led around by propaganda. Are they "responsible for their own actions?" Sure, but how responsible are they? They truly believed they were fighting for "good." SO DID MOST OF THE NAZIS! Instead, they were all different pieces of the Controlled Opposition fighting for the Cabal, doing exactly what they were intended to do to fulfill the Cabal plan. Their actions were evil by all accounts. So how "responsible" are they? Is it intent or action that makes a person evil?

Propaganda, generalization fallacies, all these tools of the Cabal create action through the creation of false belief through false intent. Who is really responsible?

Call the enemy who they are, even if you don't know their names. Do not push their false narrative by calling out the groups they use as shields.

No. Let's talk about BOTH.

Fine, just make sure you understand what the impact of your words will do. I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example, but it is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it, made them believe that their actions were "right and true," and how they made them believe those false things. Only then can we see how belief guides action, and who creates belief and how.

Just as there is rhetoric to deceive people, there is also rhetoric to censor people.

I object to both.

I agree wholeheartedly.

The "Cabal" is an important topic. However, it is not the ONLY important topic.

Well.... I think it kinda is. My research suggests that all mainstream beliefs have a direct connection to the Cabal. The Cabal runs everything, all sides, through targeted propaganda. If you understand that, nothing else really matters all that much. Nothing would be more uniting for example, than understanding that "the liberals" and "the conservatives" (or pick any two groups in opposition) are both having their entire belief system being run by the Cabal. Nothing would help people focus on the real problems than understanding that the real play of the Cabal is not contained in where the "opposite" groups disagree, but in where they agree; in the areas that no one talks about at all.

If we learn to direct our focus on the real enemy, we win the real war, not the fake one they create to distract us.

why don't YOU name the SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS who are the "Cabal?"

I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out. That was my intent. The real enemy is the Cabal. They use the larger groups as a shield. When you use the shield name, instead of the subgroup name, you give them the victory.

If we can show, for example, that 60%+ of all violent criminals just so happen to have black skin and male DNA, even though they are only 5%-6% of the total population, then that sets the stage for an important discussion.

Yes. But why is that the case? The answer is, that the Cabal is using targeted propaganda, laws, and the creation of a subculture designed specifically to create the environment where that happens. That is ALWAYS the answer (or close enough). Using any other name than "the Cabal" misleads away from the real enemy.

If we can show, for example, that the tiny hat club just so happen to follow a religious text that tells them they can do anything (literally) to anyone not in their group,

Only certain subgroups teach that as a religion, and only certain members of that subgroup believe it as presented, and even among those people, only certain people are aware of the fuckery behind those statements. Only certain people act towards that fuckery. The teachings are a form of propaganda. That propaganda is used as a recruitment tool. Those that are willing to take the next step move up the organizational ladder. It is the people at the top that are the real problem. Some of those on the lower rungs are also a problem. All the rest are simply the people who are victims of the propaganda.

THAT was my point. If other people cannot distinguish, so what?

Because it is an association fallacy. Look it up. That's what it is. Worse, it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions. Just because we can't necessarily say "everyone who is involved" doesn't mean we can't recognize the tricks that they use to hide, and stop using those tricks in our own statements which only aids in their advantage.

People might be indoctrinated, but they STILL are responsible for their own actions.

In WWII the Americans went over to Europe and killed a lot of innocent people (victims of propaganda). Included in those innocent people were many of the Germans, including the Nazis. Most of the Nazis were led around by the same association fallacy that we are here today discussing and that you are promoting. The reason the Americans committed murder in other peoples homes was because they too were led around by propaganda. Are they "responsible for their own actions?" Sure, but how responsible are they? They truly believed they were fighting for "good." SO DID MOST OF THE NAZIS! Instead, they were all different pieces of the Controlled Opposition fighting for the Cabal, doing exactly what they were intended to do to fulfill the Cabal plan. Their actions were evil by all accounts. So how "responsible" are they? Is it intent or action that makes a person evil?

Propaganda, generalization fallacies, all these tools of the Cabal create action through the creation of false belief through false intent. Who is really responsible?

Call the enemy who they are, even if you don't know their names. Do not push their false narrative by calling out the groups they use as shields.

No. Let's talk about BOTH.

Fine, just make sure you understand what the impact of your words will do. I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example, but it is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it, made them believe that their actions were "right and true," and how they made them believe those false things. Only then can we see how belief guides action, and who creates belief and how.

Just as there is rhetoric to deceive people, there is also rhetoric to censor people.

I object to both.

I agree wholeheartedly.

The "Cabal" is an important topic. However, it is not the ONLY important topic.

Well.... I think it kinda is. My research suggests that all mainstream beliefs have a direct connection to the Cabal. The Cabal runs everything, all sides, through targeted propaganda. If you understand that, nothing else really matters all that much. Nothing would be more uniting for example, than understanding that "the liberals" and "the conservatives" (or pick any two groups in opposition) are both having their entire belief system being run by the Cabal. Nothing would help people focus on the real problems than understanding that the real play of the Cabal is not contained in where the "opposite" groups disagree, but in where they agree; in the areas that no one talks about at all.

why don't YOU name the SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS who are the "Cabal?"

I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out. That was my intent. The real enemy is the Cabal. They use the larger groups as a shield. When you use the shield name, instead of the subgroup name, you give them the victory.

If we can show, for example, that 60%+ of all violent criminals just so happen to have black skin and male DNA, even though they are only 5%-6% of the total population, then that sets the stage for an important discussion.

Yes. But why is that the case? The answer is, that the Cabal is using targeted propaganda, laws, and the creation of a subculture designed specifically to create the environment where that happens. That is ALWAYS the answer (or close enough). Using any other name than "the Cabal" misleads away from the real enemy.

If we can show, for example, that the tiny hat club just so happen to follow a religious text that tells them they can do anything (literally) to anyone not in their group,

Only certain subgroups teach that as a religion, and only certain members of that subgroup believe it as presented, and even among those people, only certain people are aware of the fuckery behind those statements. Only certain people act towards that fuckery. The teachings are a form of propaganda. That propaganda is used as a recruitment tool. Those that are willing to take the next step move up the organizational ladder. It is the people at the top that are the real problem. Some of those on the lower rungs are also a problem. All the rest are simply the people who are victims of the propaganda.

THAT was my point. If other people cannot distinguish, so what?

Because it is an association fallacy. Look it up. That's what it is. Worse, it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions. Just because we can't necessarily say "everyone who is involved" doesn't mean we can't recognize the tricks that they use to hide, and stop using those tricks in our own statements which only aids in their advantage.

People might be indoctrinated, but they STILL are responsible for their own actions.

In WWII the Americans went over to Europe and killed a lot of innocent people (victims of propaganda). Included in those innocent people were many of the Germans, including the Nazis. Most of the Nazis were led around by the same association fallacy that we are here today discussing and that you are promoting. The reason the Americans committed murder in other peoples homes was because they too were led around by propaganda. Are they "responsible for their own actions?" Sure, but how responsible are they? They truly believed they were fighting for "good." SO DID MOST OF THE NAZIS! Instead, they were all different pieces of the Controlled Opposition fighting for the Cabal, doing exactly what they were intended to do to fulfill the Cabal plan. Their actions were evil by all accounts. So how "responsible" are they? Is it intent or action that makes a person evil?

Propaganda, generalization fallacies, all these tools of the Cabal create action through the creation of false belief through false intent. Who is really responsible?

Call the enemy who they are, even if you don't know their names. Do not push their false narrative by calling out the groups they use as shields.

No. Let's talk about BOTH.

Fine, just make sure you understand what the impact of your words will do. I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example, but it is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it, made them believe that their actions were "right and true," and how they made them believe those false things. Only then can we see how belief guides action, and who creates belief.

Just as there is rhetoric to deceive people, there is also rhetoric to censor people.

I object to both.

I agree wholeheartedly.

The "Cabal" is an important topic. However, it is not the ONLY important topic.

Well.... I think it kinda is. My research suggests that all mainstream beliefs have a direct connection to the Cabal. The Cabal runs everything, all sides, through targeted propaganda. If you understand that, nothing else really matters all that much. Nothing would be more uniting for example, than understanding that "the liberals" and "the conservatives" (or pick any two groups in opposition) are both having their entire belief system being run by the Cabal. Nothing would help people focus on the real problems than understanding that the real play of the Cabal is not contained in where the "opposite" groups disagree, but in where they agree; in the areas that no one talks about at all.

why don't YOU name the SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS who are the "Cabal?"

I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out. That was my intent. The real enemy is the Cabal. They use the larger groups as a shield. When you use the shield name, instead of the subgroup name, you give them the victory.

If we can show, for example, that 60%+ of all violent criminals just so happen to have black skin and male DNA, even though they are only 5%-6% of the total population, then that sets the stage for an important discussion.

Yes. But why is that the case? The answer is, that the Cabal is using targeted propaganda, laws, and the creation of a subculture designed specifically to create the environment where that happens. That is ALWAYS the answer (or close enough). Using any other name than "the Cabal" misleads away from the real enemy.

If we can show, for example, that the tiny hat club just so happen to follow a religious text that tells them they can do anything (literally) to anyone not in their group,

Only certain subgroups teach that as a religion, and only certain members of that subgroup believe it as presented, and even among those people, only certain people are aware of the fuckery behind those statements. Only certain people act towards that fuckery. The teachings are a form of propaganda. That propaganda is used as a recruitment tool. Those that are willing to take the next step move up the organizational ladder. It is the people at the top that are the real problem. Some of those on the lower rungs are also a problem. All the rest are simply the people who are victims of the propaganda.

THAT was my point. If other people cannot distinguish, so what?

Because it is an association fallacy. Look it up. That's what it is. Worse, it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions. Just because we can't necessarily say "everyone who is involved" doesn't mean we can't recognize the tricks that they use to hide, and stop using those tricks in our own statements which only aids in their advantage.

People might be indoctrinated, but they STILL are responsible for their own actions.

In WWII the Americans went over to Europe and killed a lot of innocent people (victims of propaganda). Included in those innocent people were many of the Germans, including the Nazis. Most of the Nazis were led around by the same association fallacy that we are here today discussing and that you are promoting. The reason the Americans committed murder in other peoples homes was because they too were led around by propaganda. Are they "responsible for their own actions?" Sure, but how responsible are they? They truly believed they were fighting for "good." SO DID MOST OF THE NAZIS! Instead, they were all different pieces of the Controlled Opposition fighting for the Cabal, doing exactly what they were intended to do to fulfill the Cabal plan. Their actions were evil by all accounts. So how "responsible" are they? Is it intent or action that makes a person evil?

Propaganda, generalization fallacies, all these tools of the Cabal create action through the creation of false belief through false intent. Who is really responsible?

Call the enemy who they are, even if you don't know their names. Do not push their false narrative by calling out the groups they use as shields.

No. Let's talk about BOTH.

Fine, just make sure you understand what the impact of your words will do. I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example, but it is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it. Only then can we see how belief guides action, and who creates belief.

Just as there is rhetoric to deceive people, there is also rhetoric to censor people.

I object to both.

I agree wholeheartedly.

The "Cabal" is an important topic. However, it is not the ONLY important topic.

Well.... I think it kinda is. My research suggests that all mainstream beliefs have a direct connection to the Cabal. The Cabal runs everything, all sides, through targeted propaganda. If you understand that, nothing else really matters all that much. Nothing would be more uniting for example, than understanding that "the liberals" and "the conservatives" (or pick any two groups in opposition) are both having their entire belief system being run by the Cabal. Nothing would help people focus on the real problems than understanding that the real play of the Cabal is not contained in where the "opposite" groups disagree, but in where they agree; in the areas that no one talks about at all.

why don't YOU name the SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS who are the "Cabal?"

I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out. That was my intent. The real enemy is the Cabal. They use the larger groups as a shield. When you use the shield name, instead of the subgroup name, you give them the victory.

If we can show, for example, that 60%+ of all violent criminals just so happen to have black skin and male DNA, even though they are only 5%-6% of the total population, then that sets the stage for an important discussion.

Yes. But why is that the case? The answer is, that the Cabal is using targeted propaganda, laws, and the creation of a subculture designed specifically to create the environment where that happens. That is ALWAYS the answer (or close enough). Using any other name than "the Cabal" misleads away from the real enemy.

If we can show, for example, that the tiny hat club just so happen to follow a religious text that tells them they can do anything (literally) to anyone not in their group,

Only certain subgroups teach that as a religion, and only certain members of that subgroup believe it as presented, and even among those people, only certain people are aware of the fuckery behind those statements. Only certain people act towards that fuckery. The teachings are a form of propaganda. That propaganda is used as a recruitment tool. Those that are willing to take the next step move up the organizational ladder. It is the people at the top that are the real problem. Some of those on the lower rungs are also a problem. All the rest are simply the people who are victims of the propaganda.

THAT was my point. If other people cannot distinguish, so what?

Because it is an association fallacy. Look it up. That's what it is. Worse, it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions. Just because we can't necessarily say "everyone who is involved" doesn't mean we can't recognize the tricks that they use to hide, and stop using those tricks in our own statements which only aids in their advantage.

People might be indoctrinated, but they STILL are responsible for their own actions.

In WWII the Americans went over to Europe and killed a lot of innocent people (victims of propaganda). Included in those innocent people were many of the Germans, including the Nazis. Most of the Nazis were led around by the same association fallacy that we are here today discussing and that you are promoting. The reason the Americans committed murder in other peoples homes was because they too were led around by propaganda. Are they "responsible for their own actions?" Sure, but how responsible are they? They truly believed they were fighting for "good." SO DID MOST OF THE NAZIS! Instead, they were all different pieces of the Controlled Opposition fighting for the Cabal, doing exactly what they were intended to do to fulfill the Cabal plan. Their actions were evil by all accounts. So how "responsible" are they? Is it intent or action that makes a person evil?

Propaganda, generalization fallacies, all these tools of the Cabal create action through the creation of false intent. Who is really responsible?

Call the enemy who they are, even if you don't know their names. Do not push their false narrative by calling out the groups they use as shields.

No. Let's talk about BOTH.

Fine, just make sure you understand what the impact of your words will do. I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example, but it is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it. Only then can we see how belief guides action, and who creates belief.

Just as there is rhetoric to deceive people, there is also rhetoric to censor people.

I object to both.

I agree wholeheartedly.

The "Cabal" is an important topic. However, it is not the ONLY important topic.

Well.... I think it kinda is. My research suggests that all mainstream beliefs have a direct connection to the Cabal. The Cabal runs everything, all sides, through targeted propaganda. If you understand that, nothing else really matters all that much. Nothing would be more uniting for example, than understanding that "the liberals" and "the conservatives" (or pick any two groups in opposition) are both having their entire belief system being run by the Cabal. Nothing would help people focus on the real problems than understanding that the real play of the Cabal is not contained in where the "opposite" groups disagree, but in where they agree; in the areas that no one talks about at all.

why don't YOU name the SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS who are the "Cabal?"

I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out. That was my intent. The real enemy is the Cabal. They use the larger groups as a shield. When you use the shield name, instead of the subgroup name, you give them the victory.

If we can show, for example, that 60%+ of all violent criminals just so happen to have black skin and male DNA, even though they are only 5%-6% of the total population, then that sets the stage for an important discussion.

Yes. But why is that the case? The answer is, that the Cabal is using targeted propaganda, laws, and the creation of a subculture designed specifically to create the environment where that happens. That is ALWAYS the answer (or close enough). Using any other name than "the Cabal" misleads away from the real enemy.

If we can show, for example, that the tiny hat club just so happen to follow a religious text that tells them they can do anything (literally) to anyone not in their group,

Only certain subgroups teach that as a religion, and only certain members of that subgroup believe it as presented, and even among those people, only certain people are aware of the fuckery behind those statements. Only certain people act towards that fuckery. The teachings are a form of propaganda. That propaganda is used as a recruitment tool. Those that are willing to take the next step move up the organizational ladder. It is the people at the top that are the real problem. Some of those on the lower rungs are also a problem. All the rest are simply the people who are victims of the propaganda.

THAT was my point. If other people cannot distinguish, so what?

Because it is an association fallacy. Look it up. That's what it is. Worse, it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions. Just because we can't necessarily say "everyone who is involved" doesn't mean we can't recognize the tricks that they use to hide, and stop using those tricks in our own statements which only aids in their advantage.

People might be indoctrinated, but they STILL are responsible for their own actions.

In WWII the Americans went over to Europe and killed a lot of innocent people (victims of propaganda). Included in those innocent people were many of the Germans, including the Nazis. Most of the Nazis were led around by the same association fallacy that we are here today discussing and that you are promoting. The reason the Americans committed murder in other peoples homes was because they too were led around by propaganda. Are they "responsible for their own actions?" Sure, but how responsible are they? They truly believed they were fighting for "good." Instead, they were the Controlled Opposition fighting for the Cabal, doing exactly what they were intended to do to fulfill the Cabal plan. Their actions were evil by all accounts. So how "responsible" are they? Is it intent or action that makes a person evil?

Propaganda, generalization fallacies, all these tools of the Cabal create action through the creation of false intent. Who is really responsible?

Call the enemy who they are, even if you don't know their names. Do not push their false narrative by calling out the groups they use as shields.

No. Let's talk about BOTH.

Fine, just make sure you understand what the impact of your words will do. I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example, but it is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it. Only then can we see how belief guides action, and who creates belief.

Just as there is rhetoric to deceive people, there is also rhetoric to censor people.

I object to both.

I agree wholeheartedly.

The "Cabal" is an important topic. However, it is not the ONLY important topic.

Well.... I think it kinda is. My research suggests that all mainstream beliefs have a direct connection to the Cabal. The Cabal runs everything, all sides, through targeted propaganda. If you understand that, nothing else really matters all that much. Nothing would be more uniting for example, than understanding that "the liberals" and "the conservatives" (or pick any two groups in opposition) are both having their entire belief system being run by the Cabal. Nothing would help people focus on the real problems than understanding that the real play of the Cabal is not contained in where the "opposite" groups disagree, but in where they agree; in the areas that no one talks about at all.

why don't YOU name the SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS who are the "Cabal?"

I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out. That was my intent. The real enemy is the Cabal. They use the larger groups as a shield. When you use the shield name, instead of the subgroup name, you give them the victory.

If we can show, for example, that 60%+ of all violent criminals just so happen to have black skin and male DNA, even though they are only 5%-6% of the total population, then that sets the stage for an important discussion.

Yes. But why is that the case? The answer is, that the Cabal is using targeted propaganda, laws, and the creation of a subculture designed specifically to create the environment where that happens. That is ALWAYS the answer (or close enough). Using any other name than "the Cabal" misleads away from the real enemy.

If we can show, for example, that the tiny hat club just so happen to follow a religious text that tells them they can do anything (literally) to anyone not in their group,

Only certain subgroups teach that as a religion, and only certain members of that subgroup believe it as presented, and even among those people, only certain people are aware of the fuckery behind those statements. Only certain people act towards that fuckery. The teachings are a form of propaganda. That propaganda is used as a recruitment tool. Those that are willing to take the next step move up the organizational ladder. It is the people at the top that are the real problem. Some of those on the lower rungs are also a problem. All the rest are simply the people who are victims of the propaganda.

THAT was my point. If other people cannot distinguish, so what?

Because it is an association fallacy. Look it up. That's what it is. Worse, it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions. Just because we can't necessarily say "everyone who is involved" doesn't mean we can't recognize the tricks that they use to hide, and stop using those tricks in our own statements which only aids in their advantage.

People might be indoctrinated, but they STILL are responsible for their own actions.

The American's went over to Europe and killed a lot of innocent people. Included in those innocent people were many of the Germans, including the Nazis. Most of the Nazis were led around by the same association fallacy that we are here today discussing and that you are promoting. The reason the Americans committed murder in other peoples homes was because they too were led around by propaganda. Are they "responsible for their own actions?" Sure, but how responsible are they? They truly believed they were fighting for "good." Instead, they were the Controlled Opposition fighting for the Cabal, doing exactly what they were intended to do to fulfill the Cabal plan. Their actions were evil by all accounts. So how "responsible" are they? Is it intent or action that makes a person evil?

Propaganda, generalization fallacies, all these tools of the Cabal create action through the creation of false intent. Who is really responsible?

Call the enemy who they are, even if you don't know their names. Do not push their false narrative by calling out the groups they use as shields.

No. Let's talk about BOTH.

Fine, just make sure you understand what the impact of your words will do. I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example, but it is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it. Only then can we see how belief guides action, and who creates belief.

Just as there is rhetoric to deceive people, there is also rhetoric to censor people.

I object to both.

I agree wholeheartedly.

The "Cabal" is an important topic. However, it is not the ONLY important topic.

Well.... I think it kinda is. My research suggests that all mainstream beliefs have a direct connection to the Cabal. The Cabal runs everything, all sides, through targeted propaganda. If you understand that, nothing else really matters all that much. Nothing would be more uniting for example, than understanding that "the liberals" and "the conservatives" (or pick any two groups in opposition) are both having their entire belief system being run by the Cabal. Nothing would help people focus on the real problems than understanding that the real play of the Cabal is not contained in where the "opposite" groups disagree, but in where they agree; in the areas that no one talks about at all.