I read a article few months ago claiming Tucker is controlled opposition. I will try to locate it. The premise is, Tucker covers every story superficially. He may cover the hard hitting stories but never digs deeper than needed, never goes up the ladder to expose where the evil stems from.
Fox fired Tucker, what impression does that paint with the general public? One would think, the Fox and Tucker split must mean they were sitting on opposite sides of the fence. You would think that Tucker leaving Fox would give him the freedom to expand on many of the Q topics like globalism, or crimes against humanity.. He has not.
When Tucker interviewed Putin, did he question Putin about the biolabs in Ukraine or the hundreds of billions laundered through Ukraine? Did Tucker ask about Putin's struggle with the international banking industry, Putin's effort to eliminate them from Russia?
If Putin is joining forces to create BRICS to compete with the petro dollar, he is in direct conflict with Rothchild control of the planet monetary system. I'm sure Putin knows about the Israeli / Rothchild connection, bribing our politicians with Mossad honeypot Epstein Island scenario and control of our media. Was this discussed? What did we get? Lesson on Russian history?
The Fox /Tucker split made the MAGA supporters think Tucker was fired for covering topics that benefit the Trump administration, but in reality we are still getting a 40,000 foot view. Tucker is not digging deep enough to show the evil complex behind the curtain.
Edit: Here is the article I referred to. It was posted Feb 11th. Why did it seem like I read it a few months ago? I think there is so much information coming in, it distorts the perception of time.
I read a article few months ago claiming Tucker is controlled opposition. I will try to locate it. The premise is, Tucker covers every story superficially. He may cover the hard hitting stories but never digs deeper than needed, never goes up the ladder to expose where the evil stems from.
Fox fired Tucker, what impression does that paint with the general public? One would think, the Fox and Tucker split must mean they were sitting on opposite sides of the fence. You would think that Tucker leaving Fox would give him the freedom to expand on many of the Q topics like globalism, or crimes against humanity.. He has not.
When Tucker interviewed Putin, did he question Putin about the biolabs in Ukraine or the hundreds of billions laundered through Ukraine? Did Tucker ask about Putin's struggle with the international banking industry, Putin's effort to eliminate them from Russia?
If Putin is joining forces to create BRICS to compete with the petro dollar, he is in direct conflict with Rothchild control of the planet monetary system. I'm sure Putin knows about the Israeli / Rothchild connection, bribing our politicians with Mossad honeypot Epstein Island scenario and control of our media. Was this discussed? What did we get? Lesson on Russian history?
The Fox /Tucker split made the MAGA supporters think Tucker was fired for covering topics that benefit the Trump administration, but in reality we are still getting a 40,000 foot veiw. Tucker is not digging deep enough to show the evil complex behind the curtain.
I read a article few months ago claiming Tucker is controlled opposition. I will try to locate it. The premise is, Tucker covers every story superficially. He may cover the hard hitting stories but never digs deeper than needed, never goes up the ladder to expose where the evil stems from.
Fox fired Tucker, what impression does that paint with the general public? One would think, the Fox and Tucker split must mean they were sitting on opposite sides of the fence. You would think that Tucker leaving Fox would give him the freedom to expand on many of the Q topics like globalism, or crimes against humanity.. He has not.
When Tucker interviewed Putin, did he question Putin about the biolabs in Ukraine or the hundreds of billions laundered through Ukraine? Did Tucker ask about Putin's struggle with the international banking industry, Putin's effort to eliminate them from Russia?
If Putin is joining forces to create BRICS to compete with the petro dollar, he is in direct conflict with Rothchild control of the planet monetary system. I'm sure Putin knows about the Israeli / Rothchild connection, bribing or politicians with Mossad honeypot Epstein Island scenario and control of our media. Was this discussed? What did we get? Lesson on Russian history?
The Fox /Tucker split made the MAGA supporters think Tucker was fired for covering topics that benefit the Trump administration, but in reality we are still getting a 40,000 foot veiw. Tucker is not digging deep enough to show the evil complex behind the curtain.
I read a article few months ago claiming Tucker is controlled opposition. I will try to locate it. The premise is, Tucker covers every story superficially. He may cover the hard hitting stories but never digs deeper than needed, never goes up the ladder to expose where the evil stems from.
Fox fired Tucker, what impression does that paint with the general public? One would think, the Fox and Tucker split must mean they were sitting on opposite sides of the fence. You would think that Tucker leaving Fox would give him the freedom to expand on many of the Q topics like globalism, or crimes against humanity.. He has not.
When Tucker interviewed Putin, did he question Putin about the biolabs in Ukraine or the hundreds of billions laundered through Ukraine? Did Tucker ask about Putin's struggle with the international banking industry, Putin's effort to eliminate them from Russia?
If Putin is joining forces to create BRICS to compete with the petro dollar, he is in direct conflict with Rothchild control of the planet monetary system. I'm sure Putin knows about the Israeli / Rothchild connection, bribing or politicians with Mossad honeypot Epstein Island scenario and control of our media. Was this discussed? What did we get? Lesson on Russian history?