I think it's even ridiculous that we have to rely on "good" billionaires to somehow beat the "bad" billionaires. How is this any better than wars of succession between rival claims to the monarchy? How is this a "stable" situation? Theoretically it's supposed to be voters deciding on the best candidate.

Bukele had a really powerful insight in that in the end, power will rest in either a monarch or merchants. In our case, we're at the mercy of billionaires and bankers.

IMO, elected monarchy is the best and most stable political system as far as history is concerned. Republics are simply too vulnerable to outside forces because they can easily be coopted by secret societies and the rich. That's why freemasons were busy overthrowing the old monarchies and installing Democratic Republics so that they could rule via money. The rewards for being in control of the Republic are far too great for even the most virtuous to resist being corrupted by.

I think it's even ridiculous that we have to rely on "good" billionaires to somehow beat the "bad" billionaires. How is this any better than wars of succession between rival claims to the monarchy? How is this a "stable" situation? Theoretically it's supposed to be voters deciding on the best candidate.

Bukele had a really powerful insight in that in the end, power will rest in either a monarch or merchants. In our case, we're at the mercy of billionaires and bankers.

IMO, elected monarchy is the best and most stable political system as far as history is concerned. Republics are simply too vulnerable to outside forces because they can easily be coopted by secret societies and the rich. That's why freemasons were busy overthrowing the old monarchies and installing Democratic Republics so that they could rule via money.