Not too far off from society in general right now.

Two days ago, there was a woman in a local grocery store wearing nothing but a thong for pants with a shirt that didn’t cover it.

If I was in a beach town, or if we’re being super tolerant maybe even wal-mart, this might make sense, but no. The lady just wore clear, full-butt-exposing underwear to the grocery to walk around two elementary age boys.

Your point is still valid. We have a lot of work to do in general.

My personal opinion, whatever that’s worth…

Men, try to persuade your wives and daughters back into wearing lovely dresses. Public yoga pants aren’t much different than spraypainted bare legs which, Sports Illustrated has proven, functions perfectly well as pornography.

(Leggings under the dress, or maybe around the house may be fine. Just pointing at leggings and below as a top layer in public. Men, civilized ones, anyway, don’t wear their froot of the loom as a top layer. Women maybe shouldn’t wear their undergarments as a top layer, either.

Sorry for the off-topic rant. By the same note, men shouldn’t dress down in public so much, either. We can all work on holding ourselves to higher standards. Those old 1870s and 1920s photos of everyone walking around downtowns like suited genteel kings and elegant dainty queens never happen again if we don’t hold ourselves to that standard individually, and we are all in this together - WWG1…)

Not too far off from society in general right now.

Two days ago, there was a woman in a local grocery store wearing nothing but a thong for pants with a shirt that didn’t cover it.

If I was in a beach town, or if we’re being super tolerant maybe even wal-mart, this might make sense, but no. The lady just wore clear, full-butt-exposing underwear to the grocery to walk around two elementary age boys.

Your point is still valid. We have a lot of work to do in general.

My personal opinion, whatever that’s worth…

Men, try to persuade your wives and daughters back into wearing lovely dresses. Public yoga pants aren’t much different than spraypainted bare legs which, Sports Illustrated has proven, functions perfectly well as pornography.

(No issue with leggings under the dress, or maybe around the house. Just pointing at leggings as a top layer in public. Men, civilized ones, anyway, don’t wear their froot of the loom as a top layer. Women maybe shouldn’t wear their undergarments as a top layer, either.

Sorry for the off-topic rant. By the same note, men shouldn’t dress down in public so much, either. We can all work on holding ourselves to higher standards. Those old 1870s and 1920s photos of everyone walking around downtowns like suited genteel kings and elegant dainty queens never happen again if we don’t hold ourselves to that standard individually)

Not too far off from society in general right now.

Two days ago, there was a woman in a local grocery store wearing nothing but a thong for pants with a shirt that didn’t cover it.

If I was in a beach town, or if we’re being super tolerant maybe even wal-mart, this might make sense, but no. The lady just wore clear, full-butt-exposing underwear to the grocery to walk around two elementary age boys.

Your point is still valid. We have a lot of work to do in general.

My personal opinion, whatever that’s worth…

Men, try to persuade your wives and daughters back into wearing lovely dresses. Public yoga pants aren’t much different than spraypainted bare legs, which Sports Illustrated has proven functions perfectly well as pornography.

(No issue with leggings under the dress, or maybe around the house. Just pointing at leggings as a top layer in public. Men, civilized ones, anyway, don’t wear their froot of the loom as a top layer. Women maybe shouldn’t wear their undergarments as a top layer, either.

Sorry for the off-topic rant. By the same note, men shouldn’t dress down in public so much, either. We can all work on holding ourselves to higher standards. Those old 1870s and 1920s photos of everyone walking around downtowns like suited genteel kings and elegant dainty queens never happen again if we don’t hold ourselves to that standard individually)

Not too far off from society in general right now.

Two days ago, there was a woman in a local grocery store wearing nothing but a thong for pants with a shirt that didn’t cover it.

If I was in a beach town, or if we’re being super tolerant maybe even wal-mart, this might make sense, but no. The lady just wore clear, full-butt-exposing underwear to the grocery to walk around two elementary age boys.

Your point is still valid. We have a lot of work to do in general.

My personal opinion, whatever that’s worth…

Men, try to persuade your wives and daughters back into wearing lovely dresses. Public yoga pants aren’t much different than spraypainted bare legs, which sports illustrated has proven functions perfectly well as pornography.

(No issue with leggings under the dress, or maybe around the house. Just pointing at leggings as a top layer in public. Men, civilized ones, anyway, don’t wear their froot of the loom as a top layer. Women maybe shouldn’t wear their undergarments as a top layer, either.

Sorry for the off-topic rant. By the same note, men shouldn’t dress down in public so much, either. We can all work on holding ourselves to higher standards. Those old 1870s and 1920s photos of everyone walking around downtowns like suited genteel kings and elegant dainty queens never happen again if we don’t hold ourselves to that standard individually)

Not too far off from society in general right now.

Two days ago, there was a woman in a local grocery store wearing nothing but a thong for pants with a shirt that didn’t cover it.

If I was in a beach town, or if we’re being super tolerant maybe even wal-mart, this might make sense, but no. The lady just wore clear, full-butt-exposing underwear to the grocery to walk around two elementary age boys.

Your point is still valid. We have a lot of work to do.

My personal opinion, whatever that’s worth…

Men, try to persuade your wives and daughters back into wearing lovely dresses. Public yoga pants aren’t much different than spraypainted bare legs, which sports illustrated has proven functions perfectly well as pornography.

(No issue with leggings under the dress, or maybe around the house. Just pointing at leggings as a top layer in public. Men, civilized ones, anyway, don’t wear their froot of the loom as a top layer. Women maybe shouldn’t wear their undergarments as a top layer, either.

Sorry for the off-topic rant. By the same note, men shouldn’t dress down in public so much, either. We can all work on holding ourselves to higher standards. Those old 1870s and 1920s photos of everyone walking around downtowns like suited genteel kings and elegant dainty queens never happen again if we don’t hold ourselves to that standard individually)

Not too far off from society in general right now.

Two days ago, there was a woman in a local grocery store wearing nothing but a thong for pants with a shirt that didn’t cover it.

If I was in a beach town, or if we’re being super tolerant maybe even wal-mart, this might make sense, but no. The lady just wore clear, full-butt-exposing underwear to the grocery to walk around two elementary age boys.

Your point is still valid. We have a lot of work to do.

My personal opinion, whatever that’s worth…

Men, try to persuade your wives and daughters back into wearing lovely dresses. Public yoga pants aren’t much different than spraypainted bare legs, which sports illustrated has proven functions perfectly well as pornography.

(No issue with leggings under the dress, or maybe around the house. Just pointing at leggings as a top layer in public. Men, civilized ones, anyway, don’t wear their froot of the loom as a top layer. Women maybe shouldn’t wear their undergarments as a top layer, either.

Sorry for the off-topic rant. By the same note, men shouldn’t dress down in public so much, either. We can all work on holding ourselves to higher standards. Those old 1870s and 1920s photos of everyone walking around downtowns like suited genteel kings and dainty queens never happen again if we don’t hold ourselves to that standard individually)

Not too far off from society in general right now.

Two days ago, there was a woman in a local grocery store wearing nothing but a thong for pants with a shirt that didn’t cover it.

If I was in a beach town, or if we’re being super tolerant maybe even wal-mart, this might make sense, but no. The lady just wore clear, full-butt-exposing underwear to the grocery to walk around two elementary age boys.

Your point is still valid. We have a lot of work to do.

My personal opinion, whatever that’s worth…

Men, try to persuade your wives and daughters back into wearing lovely dresses. Public yoga pants aren’t much different than spraypainted bare legs, which sports illustrated has proven functions perfectly well as pornography.

(No issue with leggings under the dress, or maybe around the house. Just pointing at leggings as a top layer in public. Men, civilized ones, anyway, don’t wear their froot of the loom as a top layer. Women maybe shouldn’t wear their undergarments as a top layer, either.

Sorry for the off-topic rant. By the same note, men shouldn’t dress down in public so much, either. We can all work on holding ourselves to higher standards. Those old 1870s and 1920s photos of everyone walking around downtowns like suited kings and dainty queens never happen again if we don’t hold ourselves to that standard individually)

Not too far off from society in general right now.

Two days ago, there was a woman in a local grocery store wearing nothing but a thong for pants with a shirt that didn’t cover it.

If I was in a beach town, or if we’re being super tolerant maybe even wal-mart, this might make sense, but no. The lady just wore clear, full-butt-exposing underwear to the grocery to walk around two elementary age boys.

Your point is still valid. We have a lot of work to do.

My personal opinion, whatever that’s worth…

Men, try to persuade your wives and daughters back into wearing lovely dresses. Public yoga pants aren’t much different than spraypainted bare legs, which sports illustrated has proven functions perfectly well as pornography.

(No issue with leggings under the dress, or maybe around the house. Just pointing at leggings as a top layer in public. Men, civilized ones, anyway, don’t wear their froot of the loom as a top layer. Women maybe shouldn’t wear their undergarments as a top layer, either.

Sorry for the off-topic rant. By the same note, men shouldn’t dress down in public so much, either. We can all work on holding ourselves to higher standards. Those old 1870s and 1920s photos of everyone walking around downtowns like suited kings and dainty queens never happen again if we don’t hold ourselves to that standard individually)

Not too far off from society in general right now.

Two days ago, there was a woman in a local grocery store wearing nothing but a thong for pants with a shirt that didn’t cover it.

If I was in a beach town, or if we’re being super tolerant maybe even wal-mart, this might make sense, but no. The lady just wore clear, full-butt-exposing underwear to the grocery to walk around two elementary age boys.

Your point is still valid. We have a lot of work to do.

My personal opinion, whatever that’s worth…

Men, try to persuade your wives and daughters back into wearing lovely dresses. Public yoga pants aren’t much different than spraypainted bare legs, which sports illustrated has proven functions perfectly well as pornography.

(No issue with leggings under the dress, or maybe around the house. Just pointing at leggings as a top layer in public. Men, civilized ones, anyway, don’t wear their froot of the loom as a top layer. Women maybe shouldn’t wear their undergarments as a top layer, either.

Sorry for the off-topic rant. By the same note, men shouldn’t dress down in public so much, either. We can all work on holding ourselves to higher standards. Those old 1870s and 1920s photos of everyone walking around downtowns like suited kings and women as dainty queens never happen again if we don’t hold ourselves to that standard individually)

Not too far off from society in general right now.

Two days ago, there was a woman in a local grocery store wearing nothing but a thong for pants with a shirt that didn’t cover it.

If I was in a beach town, or if we’re being super tolerant maybe even wal-mart, this might make sense, but no. The lady just wore clear, full-butt-exposing underwear to the grocery to walk around two elementary age boys.

Your point is still valid. We have a lot of work to do.

My personal opinion, whatever that’s worth…

Men, try to persuade your wives and daughters back into wearing lovely dresses. Public yoga pants aren’t much different than spraypainted bare legs, which sports illustrated has proven functions perfectly well as pornography.

(No issue with leggings under the dress, or maybe around the house. Just pointing at leggings as a top layer in public. Men, civilized ones, anyway, don’t wear their froot of the loom as a top layer. Women maybe shouldn’t wear their undergarments as a top layer, either.

Sorry for the off-topic rant. By the same note, men shouldn’t dress down in public so much, either. We can all work on holding ourselves to higher standards.)

Not too far off from society in general right now.

Two days ago, there was a woman in a local grocery store wearing nothing but a thong for pants with a shirt that didn’t cover it.

If I was in a beach town, or if we’re being super tolerant maybe even wal-mart, this might make sense, but no. The lady just wore clear, full-butt-exposing underwear to the grocery to walk around two elementary age boys.

Your point is still valid. We have a lot of work to do.

My personal opinion, whatever that’s worth…

Men, try to persuade your wives and daughters back into wearing lovely dresses. Public yoga pants aren’t much different than spraypainted bare legs, which sports illustrated has proven functions perfectly well as pornography.

(No issue with leggings under the dress, or maybe around the house. Just pointing at leggings as a top layer in public. Men, civilized ones, anyway, don’t wear their froot of the loom as a top layer. Women maybe shouldn’t wear their undergarments as a top layer, either.)

Sorry for the off-topic rant. By the same note, men shouldn’t dress down in public so much, either. We can all work on holding ourselves to higher standards.

Not too far off from society in general right now.

Two days ago, there was a woman in a local grocery store wearing nothing but a thong for pants with a shirt that didn’t cover it.

If I was in a beach town, or if we’re being super tolerant maybe even wal-mart, this might make sense, but no. The lady just wore clear, full-butt-exposing underwear to the grocery to walk around two elementary age boys.

Your point is still valid. We have a lot of work to do.

My personal opinion, whatever that’s worth…

Men, try to persuade your wives and daughters back into wearing lovely dresses. Public yoga pants aren’t much different than spraypainted bare legs, which sports illustrated has proven functions perfectly well as pornography.

(No issue with leggings under the dress, or maybe around the house. Just pointing at leggings as a top layer. Men, civilized ones, anyway, don’t wear their froot of the loom as a top layer in public. Women maybe shouldn’t wear their undergarments as a top layer, either.)

Sorry for the off-topic rant. By the same note, men shouldn’t dress down in public so much, either. We can all work on holding ourselves to higher standards.

Not too far off from society in general right now.

Two days ago, there was a woman in a local grocery store wearing nothing but a thong for pants with a shirt that didn’t cover it.

If I was in a beach town, or if we’re being super tolerant maybe even wal-mart, this might make sense, but no. The lady just wore clear, full-butt-exposing underwear to the grocery to walk around two elementary age boys.

Your point is still valid. We have a lot of work to do.

My personal opinion, whatever that’s worth…

Men, try to persuade your wives and daughters back into wearing lovely dresses. Public yoga pants aren’t much different than spraypainted bare legs, which sports illustrated has proven functions perfectly well as pornography.

(No issue with leggings under the dress, or maybe around the house. Just pointing at leggings as a top layer. Men, civilized ones, anyway, don’t wear their froot of the loom as a top layer in public. Women maybe shouldn’t wear their undergarments as a top layer, either.)

Not too far off from society in general right now.

Two days ago, there was a woman in a local grocery store wearing nothing but a thong for pants with a shirt that didn’t cover it.

If I was in a beach town, or if we’re being super tolerant maybe even wal-mart, this might make sense, but no. The lady just wore clear, full-butt-exposing underwear to the grocery to walk around two elementary age boys.

Your point is still valid. We have a lot of work to do.

Men, try to get your wives and daughters back into wearing lovely dresses.