Commenting to post later. There was an interesting write up on 4 Chan about how this will blow back on anti gun agendas. Just can't find it atm
Edit: found it
"In her haste to make sure illegals had guns in order to terrorize white people, she was forced to make the legal reasoning that
permitting requirements are illegal carry restrictions in "public" are illegal bans on non-violent felons owning guns are illegal
This is going to be a good one when people get past the headline
Coleman, an Obama appointee, cited the 2022 Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, which found that New York State could not constitutionally prevent people from carrying a pistol in public
"The Court finds that Carbajal-Flores' criminal record, containing no improper use of a weapon as well as the non-violent circumstances of his arrest do not support a finding that he poses a risk to public safety such that he cannot be trusted to use a weapon responsibly and should be deprived of his Second Amendment right to bear arms in self-defense," Judge Coleman wrote. "Thus, this Court finds that, as applied to Carbajal-Flores, Section 922(g)(5) is unconstitutional
Commenting to post later. There was a great write up on 4 Chan about how this will blow back on anti gun agendas. Just can't find it atm
Edit: found it
"In her haste to make sure illegals had guns in order to terrorize white people, she was forced to make the legal reasoning that
permitting requirements are illegal carry restrictions in "public" are illegal bans on non-violent felons owning guns are illegal
This is going to be a good one when people get past the headline
Coleman, an Obama appointee, cited the 2022 Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, which found that New York State could not constitutionally prevent people from carrying a pistol in public
"The Court finds that Carbajal-Flores' criminal record, containing no improper use of a weapon as well as the non-violent circumstances of his arrest do not support a finding that he poses a risk to public safety such that he cannot be trusted to use a weapon responsibly and should be deprived of his Second Amendment right to bear arms in self-defense," Judge Coleman wrote. "Thus, this Court finds that, as applied to Carbajal-Flores, Section 922(g)(5) is unconstitutional
Commenting to post later. There was a great write up on 4 Chan about how this will blow back on anti gun agendas. Just can't find it atm
Edit: found it
In her haste to make sure illegals had guns in order to terrorize white people, she was forced to make the legal reasoning that
permitting requirements are illegal carry restrictions in "public" are illegal bans on non-violent felons owning guns are illegal This is going to be a good one when people get past the headline Coleman, an Obama appointee, cited the 2022 Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, which found that New York State could not constitutionally prevent people from carrying a pistol in public "The Court finds that Carbajal-Flores' criminal record, containing no improper use of a weapon as well as the non-violent circumstances of his arrest do not support a finding that he poses a risk to public safety such that he cannot be trusted to use a weapon responsibly and should be deprived of his Second Amendment right to bear arms in self-defense," Judge Coleman wrote. "Thus, this Court finds that, as applied to Carbajal-Flores, Section 922(g)(5) is unconstitutional
Commenting to post later. There was a great write up on 4 Chan about how this will blow back on anti gun agendas. Just can't find it atm