the devices are not supposed to be on internet during voting hours BUT OFTEN ARE, but they do not merely use WiFi !!!!!! Really! most of them deviously use THESE methods to connect to a relay device hidden in the room or building, or a laptop in a parking lot, by Democrats that then use their own Cell data card from that nearby device, but use these PROVEN methods to communicate out/in:
-
WiFi
-
Zigbee wireless mesh transmission (leaks across a AC power cord) :
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323798657_Development_of_Wireless_Electronic_Voting_Machine_as_an_Effective_Enhancement_of_Voting_System_Security -
Cellular telephony ( a cell phone chip)
-
Hardwire ethernet , rarely used except main tabulators
-
FirstNet ( a huge rarely discussed government paid for segment of the cellular network, able to be falsely called "not a cell phone" ) :
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-cyber-watchdog-has-no-confidence-security-us-emergency-cell-network-senator-2023-04-12/ -
Bluetooth transmitting at normal CLASS 1 level 100 meters
Most tablets (that people touch to vote) in most voting machines do contain Bluetooth chips , but are configured at CLASS 2 normally, 30 feet range up into ceiling, not 100 meters. They could transmit 30 feet to a device sitting on a nearby shelf or table that then relays at CLASS 2 outside the building :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth
Even WiFi stations can have false or missing infomation that the Democrats employ, to look innocuous. A Wifi survey 2 weeks before election compared to Wifi on election night might help, but some people carry WiFi in their phones as HOTSPOTS.
ALL OF THE ABOVE ARE BUILT IN
FirstNet "cell chip" ENRAGES ME THE MOST
good luck
the devices are not supposed to be on internet during voting hours BUT OFTEN ARE, but they do not merely use WiFi !!!!!! Really! most of them deviously use THESE methods to connect to a relay device hidden in the room or building, or a laptop in a parking lot, by Democrats that then use their own Cell data card from that nearby device, but use these PROVEN methods to communicate out/in:
-
WiFi
-
Zigbee wireless mesh transmission (leaks across a AC power cord) :
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323798657_Development_of_Wireless_Electronic_Voting_Machine_as_an_Effective_Enhancement_of_Voting_System_Security -
Cellular telephony ( a cell phone chip)
-
Hardwire ethernet , rarely used
-
FirstNet ( a huge rarely discussed government paid for segment of the cellular network, able to be falsely called "not a cell phone" ) :
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-cyber-watchdog-has-no-confidence-security-us-emergency-cell-network-senator-2023-04-12/ -
Bluetooth transmitting at normal CLASS 1 level 100 meters
Most tablets (that people touch to vote) in most voting machines do contain Bluetooth chips , but are configured at CLASS 2 normally, 30 feet range up into ceiling, not 100 meters. They could transmit 30 feet to a device sitting on a nearby shelf or table that then relays at CLASS 2 outside the building :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth
Even WiFi stations can have false or missing infomation that the Democrats employ, to look innocuous. A Wifi survey 2 weeks before election compared to Wifi on election night might help, but some people carry WiFi in their phones as HOTSPOTS.
ALL OF THE ABOVE ARE BUILT IN
FirstNet "cell chip" ENRAGES ME THE MOST
good luck