So?

Does that invalidate all the information given in articles published by them?

I'm not saying to just automatically trust them, by any means.

But neither should people simply ignore or disbelieve information found there simply because they don't personally like them.

The information given in that article I linked got Trump’s tax assessments and loan information from the FOIA, and have provided them there for people to see for themselves.

Everything in that article can be verified by doing some digging yourself.

It's the lazy mind that ignores facts because they don't like the source they find it in.

It's especially hypocritical when people who do this turn around and share articles from the exact same sources whenever it suits their arguments. Something I see done here frequently, which is very disappointing.

So?

Does that invalidate all the information given in articles published by them?

I'm not saying to just automatically trust them, by any means.

But neither should people simply ignore or disbelieve information found there simply because they don't personally like them.

The information given in that article I linked got Trump’s tax assessments and loan information from the FOIA, and have provided them there for people to see for themselves.

Everything in that article can be verified by doing some digging yourself.

It's the lazy mind that ignores facts because they don't like to source they find it in.

It's especially hypocritical when people who do this turn around and share articles from the exact same sources whenever it suits their arguments. Something I see done here frequently, which is very disappointing.