I didn't say they did it all the time. Just that it's not fraud to pay more than asking price. And, again, I'd double check the numbers before choosing this argument as your hill to die on.

Now, if you had some evidence that Stewart was involved in real estate or tax fraud, then that would be different. But saying that it's stupid to pay so much, or that your values don't match the buyers isn't evidence. It's just speculation and unfounded accusations.

Trying to minimize or deflect from someone else's actions (Trump's fraud conviction) by falsely accusing someone else of the equivalent (saying Jon Stewart was involved in fraud because someone paid more than he was asking for his real estate) is wrong on a couple of levels.

1. It doesn't wash away the wrong doings of the first person. (Again, just a reminder that I don't personally believe Trump to have committed any wrong doing. I'm pointing out the flaws in the arguments logic.)

2. What Stewart is accused of doing isn't even a fraud. What's worse, even after it's pointed out, several times, that it's not a fraud, you're still gnawing on that bone.

It just reeks of desperation to have to do so many mental gymnastics to try to make Stewart look like a hypocrite on this. It's no different than when liberals look for anything they can twist about Trump to make him look bad.

What do you think those people you're trying to redpill with these fallacy ridden arguments are going to do when you present them? From what I've seen, they're going to point out everything wrong with what you're saying, note that you're either unwilling or incapable of understanding basic facts (like how accepting a real estate offer that's over your asking price isn't fraud), and then question your judgement in everything you're telling them.

I'm trying to get people to realize that they're destroying any sort of credibility they might have when they make arguments like this.

I honestly believe that one of the main reasons we haven't won over anywhere near them number of normies that we should have by now is because we have people running amok out there making the entire Q community look ignorant because of things like this.

I didn't say they did it all the time. Just that it's not fraud to pay more than asking price. And, again, I'd double check the numbers before choosing this argument as your hill to die on.

Now, if you had some evidence that Stewart was involved in real estate or tax fraud, then that would be different. But saying that it's stupid to pay so much, or that your values don't match the buyers isn't evidence. It's just speculation and unfounded accusations.

Trying to minimize or deflect from someone else's actions (Trump's fraud conviction) by falsely accusing someone else of the equivalent (saying Jon Stewart was involved in fraud because someone paid more than he was asking for his real estate) is wrong on a couple of levels.

1. It doesn't wash away the wrong doings of the first person. (Again, just a reminder that I don't personally believe Trump to have committed any wrong doing. I'm pointing out the flaws in the arguments logic.)

2. What Stewart is accused of doing isn't even a fraud. What's worse, even after it's pointed out, several times, that it's not a fraud, you're still gnawing on that bone.

It just reeks of desperation to have to do so many mental gymnastics to try to make Stewart look like a hypocrite on this. It's no different than when liberals look for anything they can twist about Trump to make him look bad.

What do you think those you're trying to redpill with these fallacy ridden arguments are going to do when you present them? From what I've seen, they're going to point out everything wrong with what you're saying, note that you're either unwilling or incapable of understanding basic facts (like how accepting a real estate offer that's over your asking price isn't fraud), and then question your judgement in everything you're telling them.

I'm trying to get people to realize that they're destroying any sort of credibility they might have when they make arguments like this.

I honestly believe that one of the main reasons we haven't won over anywhere near them number of normies that we should have by now is because we have people running amok out there making the entire Q community look ignorant because of things like this.