It's not moving goalposts. There was never a time where how much above asking price was a determination of whether or not it's fraud to accept a higher amount than asking price. So no goalposts to move.

So you change the argument to weather it is true or not?

This is probably the most asinine thing I've read this year. The argument is always about whether (not weather) or not claims being made are true. That's pretty important, unless you live off in LaLa land somewhere.

I was never arguing that the price was a factor on if it was a fraud or not. You were. I was simply suggesting that before you invested too much in that argument that you actually check to see if the numbers you're basing your opinion on were accurate. That was simply me offering you some advice on general debating skills (though this could not in the most fanciful of thoughts be considered a debate).

And again, I didn't claim that Stewart's house sale involved a bidding war. As I already explained, in very simple language, it was an example of how paying above listing price is common, and not fraud.

I'm trying to determine if you're being willfully obtuse, or if you're just not capable of understanding simple concepts.

It's not moving goalposts. There was never a time where how much above asking price was a determination of whether or not it's fraud to accept a higher amount than asking price. So no goalposts to move.

So you change the argument to weather it is true or not?

This is probably the most asinine thing I've read this year. Yes, the argument is always about whether (not weather) or not claims being made are true. That's pretty important, unless you live off in LaLa land somewhere.

I was never arguing that the price was a factor on if it was a fraud or not. You were. I was simply suggesting that before you invested too much in that argument that you actually check to see if the numbers you're basing your opinion on were accurate. That was simply me offering you some advice on general debating skills (though this could not in the most fanciful of thoughts be considered a debate).

And again, I didn't claim that Stewart's house sale involved a bidding war. As I already explained, in very simple language, it was an example of how paying above listing price is common, and not fraud.

I'm trying to determine if you're being willfully obtuse, or if you're just not capable of understanding simple concepts.

It's not moving goalposts. There was never a time where how much above asking price was a determination of whether or not it's fraud to accept a higher amount than asking price. So no goalposts to move.

So you change the argument to weather it is true or not?

This is probably the most asinine thing I've read this year. Yes, the argument is always about whether (not weather) or not claims being made are true. That's pretty important, unless you live off in LaLa land somewhere.

I was never arguing that the price was a factor on I'd it was a fraud or not. You were. I was simply suggesting that before you invested too much in that argument that you actually check to see if the numbers you're basing your opinion pn were accurate. That was simply me offering you some advice on general debating skills (though this could not in the most fanciful of thoughts be considered a debate).

And again, I didn't claim that Stewart's house sale involved a bidding war. As I already explained, in very simple language, it was an example of how paying above listing price is common, and not fraud.

I'm trying to determine if you're being willfully obtuse, or if you're just not capable of understanding simple concepts.

It's not moving goalposts. There was never a time where how much above asking price was a determination of whether or not it's fraud to accept a higher amount than asking price. So no goalposts to move.

So you change the argument to weather it is true or not?

This is probably the most asinine thing I've read this year. Yes, the argument is always about whether (not weather) or not claims being made are true. That's pretty important, unless you live off in LaLa land somewhere.

And again, I didn't claim that Stewart's house sale involved a bidding war. As I already explained, in very simple language, it was an example of how paying above listing price is common, and not fraud.

I'm trying to determine if you're being willfully obtuse, or if you're just not capable of understanding simple concepts.