What's the harm in legally preventing something they claim isn't happening? It's pretty simple, you either want them to be able to spray or you don't, no other position is relevant.

Also, this reminds me I read an article that stated the vast majority of people with an IQ less than 90 can't understand conditional hypotheticals, which seems relevant here. Me: But what IF someone wanted to spray, should that be legal?
Moron Democrat voter: Nobody is spraying, that's a conspiracy theory!
Me: I hate low IQ people.

What's the harm in legally preventing something they claim isn't happening? It's pretty simple, you either want them to be able to spray or you don't, no other position is relevant.