Kind of a condescending reply, here SS. I mean, thank you for informing me of the bleedingly obvious. In fact, I have done this in the past. What I am saying is, anons need to review the whole speech in its full textual and historical context. Do you disagree?

Is it a debate your want or an argument about how you don't like the way I said something? If you just want to get into that discussion then we should take it to pm.

I find arguing with someone's tone just derails a thread.

Kind of a condescending reply, here SS. I mean, thank you for informing me of the bleedingly obvious. In fact, I have done this in the past. What I am saying is, anons need to review the whole speech in its full textual and historical context. Do you disagree?

Is it a debate your want or an argument about how you don't like the way I said something? If you just want to get into that discussion then we should take it to pm. It's just going to derail the thread.