It seems that this Judge is merely speaking the truth
There is a BIG difference between inalienable rights vs Privileges and Immunities which are granted to you by a higher authority!!!
. .
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
===========
.
The first clause of the fourteenth amendment of the federal Constitution created two classes of citizens, one of the United States and the other of the state.
[Cory v. Carter, 48 Ind. 427, 17 Am. Rep. 738]
.
There are, then, two classes of citizens; one of the United States, and one of the state. One class of citizenship may exist in a person without the other, as in the case of a resident of the District of Columbia.
[Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County, 48 So. 788, 790, 791, 160 Ala. 155]
.
In the second sentence of the 14th Article of Amendment of the Constitution of the United States it says:
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States " (Emphasis added.)Seven years later, the Supreme Court made the distinction crystal clear: "We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own who owe it allegiance, and whose rights, within its jurisdiction, it must protect."
Slaughter House Cases United States vs. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875).
...................
“Courts enforcing mere statutes do not act judicially merely ministerial, having thus no judicial immunity, and unlike courts of law do not obtain jurisdiction by service of process nor even arrest and compelled appearance”.
Boswell v. Otis, 9 Howard 336, 348.
It seems that this Judge is merely speaking the truth
There is a BIG difference between inalienable rights vs Privileges and Immunities which are granted to you by a higher authority!!!
. .
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
===========
.
The first clause of the fourteenth amendment of the federal Constitution created two classes of citizens, one of the United States and the other of the state.
[Cory v. Carter, 48 Ind. 427, 17 Am. Rep. 738]
.
There are, then, two classes of citizens; one of the United States, and one of the state. One class of citizenship may exist in a person without the other, as in the case of a resident of the District of Columbia.
[Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County, 48 So. 788, 790, 791, 160 Ala. 155]
.
In the second sentence of the 14th Article of Amendment of the Constitution of the United States it says:
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States " (Emphasis added.)Seven years later, the Supreme Court made the distinction crystal clear: "We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own who owe it allegiance, and whose rights, within its jurisdiction, it must protect."
Slaughter House Cases United States vs. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875).
...................
“Courts enforcing mere statutes do not act judicially merely ministerial, having thus no judicial immunity, and unlike courts of law do not obtain jurisdiction by service of process nor even arrest and compelled appearance”.
Boswell v. Otis, 9 Howard 336, 348.