Here’s a super duper stupid question.
In several of the photos of the WTC there’s a clear line all the way around the exterior of the building on one of the impact sides.
Has anyone looked at what floor that is, specifically?
The building was 110 stories tall, we know the art students were on floors 90 and 91, and it looks like the floor where the line is could be floor 90, or right near it.
Then, we could take the width of the jet, and the width of that line that was supposedly sliced by the wing, and compare it against the tilt of the jet, which wasn’t horizontal, and ask, maybe, why there’s a horizontal line on the 91st floor, if that is indeed the floor where the line is, and how it was so wide when the building is X feet and the plane was only Y feet and why the line wasn’t tilted to match the impact of the plane and also jet fuel can’t melt steel beams and such.
You know, stupid questions. Just to add some more oddball noticings to the stupid fire.
https://files.catbox.moe/4mz82s.jpeg
More links
http://www.911research.wtc7.net/essays/salter/767orwhatzit.html
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread447972/pg10&mem=
https://files.catbox.moe/zbtykm.jpeg
https://files.catbox.moe/0yv8kx.jpeg
https://files.catbox.moe/ih5pcm.jpeg
https://files.catbox.moe/583awm.gif
https://files.catbox.moe/xlq289.jpeg
Here’s a super duper stupid question.
In several of the photos of the WTC there’s a clear line all the way around the exterior of the building on one of the impact sides.
Has anyone looked at what floor that is, specifically?
The building was 110 stories tall, we know the art students were on floors 90 and 91, and it looks like the floor where the line is could be floor 90, or right near it.
Then, we could take the width of the jet, and the width of that line that was supposedly sliced by the wing, and compare it against the tilt of the jet, which wasn’t horizontal, and ask, maybe, why there’s a horizontal line on the 91st floor, if that is indeed the floor where the line is, and how it was so wide when the building is X feet and the plane was only Y feet and why the line wasn’t tilted to match the impact of the plane and also jet fuel can’t melt steel beams and such.
You know, stupid questions. Just to add some more oddball noticings to the stupid fire.
https://files.catbox.moe/4mz82s.jpeg
More links
http://www.911research.wtc7.net/essays/salter/767orwhatzit.html
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread447972/pg10&mem=
Here’s a super duper stupid question.
In several of the photos of the WTC there’s a clear line all the way around the exterior of the building on one of the impact sides.
Has anyone looked at what floor that is, specifically?
The building was 110 stories tall, we know the art students were on floors 90 and 91, and it looks like the floor where the line is could be floor 90, or right near it.
Then, we could take the width of the jet, and the width of that line that was supposedly sliced by the wing, and compare it against the tilt of the jet, which wasn’t horizontal, and ask, maybe, why there’s a horizontal line on the 91st floor, if that is indeed the floor where the line is, and how it was so wide when the building is X feet and the plane was only Y feet and why the line wasn’t tilted to match the impact of the plane and also jet fuel can’t melt steel beams and such.
You know, stupid questions. Just to add some more oddball noticings to the stupid fire.
Here’s a super duper stupid question.
In several of the photos of the WTC there’s a clear line all the way around the exterior of the building on one of the impact sides.
Has anyone looked at what floor that is, specifically?
The building was 110 stories tall, we know the art students were on floors 90 and 91, and it looks like the floor where the line is could be floor 90, or right near it.
Then, we could take the width of the jet, and the width of that line that was supposedly sliced by the wing, and compare it against the tilt of the jet, which wasn’t horizontal, and ask, maybe, why there’s a horizontal line on the 91st floor, if that is indeed the floor where the line is, and how it was so wide when the building is X feet and the plane was only Y feet and why the line wasn’t tilted to match the impact of the plane and also jet fuel can’t melt steel beams and such.
Just sayin. You know, stupid questions.
Here’s a super duper stupid question.
In several of the photos of the WTC there’s a clear line all the way around the exterior of the building on one of the impact sides.
Has anyone looked at what floor that is, specifically?
The building was 110 stories tall, we know the art students were on floors 90 and 91, and it looks like the floor where the line is could be floor 90, or right near it.
Then, we could take the width of the jet, and the width of that line that was supposedly sliced by the wing, and compare it against the tilt of the jet, which wasn’t horizontal, and ask, maybe, why there’s a horizontal line on the 91st floor, if that is indeed the floor where the line is, and how it was so wide when the building is X feet and the plane was only Y feet and why the line wasn’t tilted to match the impact of the plane and also jet fuel can’t melt steel beams and such.
Just sayin.
Here’s a super duper stupid question.
In several of the photos of the WTC there’s a clear line all the way around the exterior of the building on one of the impact sides.
Has anyone looked at what floor that is, specifically?
The building was 110 stories tall, we know the art students were on floors 90 and 91, and it looks like the floor where the line is could be floor 90, or right near it.
Then, we could take the width of the jet, and the width of that line that was supposedly sliced by the wing, and compare it against the tilt of the jet, which wasn’t horizontal, and ask, maybe, why there’s a horizontal line on the 91st floor, if that is indeed the floor where the line is, and how it was so wide when the building is X feet and the plane was only Y feet and also jet fuel can’t melt steel beams and such.
Just sayin.