Fren, I respect your posts. Three notes:

1. The sky man in most paintings is typically Zeus, not God. A few may be more accurate, but it seems more likely that everything is within God manifested of and from God

2. This is why I’ve become fond of pointing out the practical aspects rather than the existence. The practical proves the unprovable - much like Q proofs prove Q, who can’t be directly proven. You won’t get much insight into the practical aspects from the vast majority of Christians, because we’ve been taught not to study them

3. For whatever it’s worth, I promise you that I have experienced practical proofs that something more than the physical exists - supernatural grace is indeed the only reason I am alive to type this (on more than one occasion) - and would also likely agree that many aspects of God are unfortunately misrepresented by most Christians, often including myself. (And one example immediately below). You have my apologies for that.

Anyhow, my focus these days is on trying to evangelize Christians. If we can get our act fixed, you won’t need to have trust in men, because you’ll witness the Truth.

Just wanted to drop a few seeds your way for later.

Fren, I respect your posts. Three notes:

1. The sky man in most paintings is typically Zeus, not God. A few may be more accurate, but it seems more likely that everything is within God manifested of and from God

2. This is why I’ve become fond of pointing out the practical aspects rather than the existence. The practical proves the unprovable - much like Q proofs prove Q, who can’t be directly proven. You won’t get much insight into the practical aspects from the vast majority of Christians, because we’ve been taught not to study them

3. For whatever it’s worth, I promise you that I have experienced practical proofs that something more than the physical exists - supernatural grace is indeed the only reason I am alive to type this (on more than one occasion) - and would also likely agree that many aspects of God are unfortunately misrepresented by most Christians, often including myself. (And one example immediately below). You have my apologies for that.

Anyhow, my focus these days is on trying to evangelize Christians. If we can get our act fixed, you won’t need to have trust in men, because you’ll witness the Truth.

Fren, I respect your posts. Three notes:

1. The sky man in most paintings is typically Zeus, not God. A few may be more accurate, but it seems more likely that everything is within God manifested of and from God

2. This is why I’ve become fond of pointing out the practical aspects rather than the existence. The practical proves the unprovable - much like Q proofs prove Q, who can’t be directly proven. You won’t get much insight into the practical aspects from the vast majority of Christians, because we’ve been taught not to study them

3. I promise you that have experienced practical proofs that something more than the physical exists - supernatural grace is indeed the only reason I am alive to type this (on more than one occasion) - and would also likely agree that many aspects of God are unfortunately misrepresented by most Christians, often including myself. (And one example immediately below). You have my apologies for that.

Fren, I respect your posts. Three notes:

1. The sky man in most paintings is typically Zeus, not God. A few may be more accurate, but it seems more likely that everything is within God manifested of and from God

2. This is why I’ve become fond of pointing out the practical aspects rather than the existence. The practical proves the unprovable - much like Q proofs prove Q, who can’t be directly proven. You won’t get much insight into the practical aspects from the vast majority of Christians, because we’ve been taught not to study them

3. I promise you that have experienced practical proofs that something more than the physical exists - supernatural grace is indeed the only reason I am alive to type this (on more than one occasion) - and would also likely agree that many aspects of God are unfortunately misrepresented by most Christians, often including myself. (And one example immediately below)

Fren, I respect your posts. Three notes:

1. The sky man in most paintings is typically Zeus, not God. A few may be more accurate, but it seems more likely that everything is within God manifested of and from God

2. This is why I’ve become fond of pointing out the practical aspects rather than the existence. The practical proves the unprovable - much like Q proofs prove Q, who can’t be directly proven. You won’t get much insight into the practical aspects from the vast majority of Christians, because we’ve been taught not to study them

3. I promise you that have experienced practical proofs that something more than the physical exists - supernatural grace is indeed the only reason I am alive to type this (on more than one occasion) - and would also likely agree that many aspects of God are unfortunately misrepresented by most Christians, often including myself.

Fren, I respect your posts. Two notes:

1. The sky man in most paintings is typically Zeus, not God. A few may be more accurate, but it seems more likely that everything is within God manifested of and from God

2. This is why I’ve become fond of pointing out the practical aspects rather than the existence. The practical proves the unprovable - much like Q proofs prove Q, who can’t be directly proven. You won’t get much insight into the practical aspects from the vast majority of Christians, because we’ve been taught not to study them

I promise you that have experienced practical proofs that something more than the physical exists - supernatural grace is indeed the only reason I am alive to type this (on more than one occasion) - and would also likely agree that many aspects of God are unfortunately misrepresented by most Christians, often including myself.

Fren, I respect your posts. Two notes:

1. The sky man in most paintings is typically Zeus, not God. A few may be more accurate, but it seems more likely that everything is within God manifested of and from God

2. This is why I’ve become fond of pointing out the practical aspects rather than the existence. The practical proves the unprovable - much like Q proofs prove Q, who can’t be directly proven. You won’t get much insight into the practical aspects from the vast majority of Christians, because we’ve been taught not to study them

I promise you that have experienced practical proofs that something more than the physical exists - supernatural grace is indeed the only reason I am alive to type this - and would also likely agree that many aspects of God are unfortunately misrepresented by most Christians, often including myself.