Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I think that was Eisner v. Macomber, but it is not what that website says.

SCOTUS said that dividends that were NOT paid in cash (they were paid with more shares of stock) were not subject to the income tax. This is different from cash dividends.

You gotta be careful and look it up yourself.

224 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I think that was Eisner v. Macomber, but it is not what that website says.

SCOTUS said that dividends that were NOT paid in cash (they were paid with more shares of stock) were not subjec to the income tax. This is different from cash dividends.

You gotta be careful and look it up yourself.

224 days ago
1 score