^ BTW, let me expand on this, because it was a SHOCKER to me when I learned it.

You simply SAYING this to a judge is ... HERESAY, and the judge can IGNORE it, as if you never said it.

You may have come across someone who said they told the judge, "The Constitution says this, or the law is that," and the judge just IGNORED what they said.

Ever hear of or read about that?

Of course.

WHY was the judge allowed to ignore it?

Because it was HERESAY.

ANY statement, whether oral or in writing, that is NOT testified to under oath, is HERESAY.

Usually, this is associated with something said outside of a courtroom. BUT it also applies to things said IN a courtroom.

ONLY testimony counts! EVERYTHING ELSE IS HERESAY.

The judge can listen to you, smile at you, and ... IGNORE you. Because what you said is heresay. It has ZERO RELEVANCE.

This ALSO applies to attorneys.

There is a famous court case, Trinsey v. Pagliaro, where it says that "statement of council (attorneys), oral or in writing (pleadings) are not sufficient for summary judgment."

This means that whatever the attorney says, whether they write it in their pleadings or say it in open court, are NOT testimony and, therefore, are NOT FACTS ON THE RECORD, NOR VALID LAW -- and the judge can ignore it, if he chooses to.

The difference is, it is a business. The judges and attorneys are both "in on it" and make their living from it. So, judges WILL pay attention to most attorneys, but they have NO REQUIREMENT to.

As for non-attorneys, they like to ignore us whenever they can.

BUT ... there is a solution!

(There is ALWAYS a remedy in the law!)

First, you can create an affidavit (but you have to learn how to do it right), stating whatever it is you want the judge to consider. The judge is not lawfully allowed to ignore an affidavit (though some will try).

But even that is not enough, because it still MUST be testified to IN COURT.

How do you do that if the judge will not let you be on the witness stand? Maybe what you are arguing is not yet at the point of a trial, so you are not legally entitled to just go on the witness stand whenever you want.

But you don't have to.

So second, after you have the affidavit in the record, you stand up where you are (you do not need the judge's permission to do this), and state:

"Your honor, I understand that I am required here today to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God, and that if I do not tell the truth, I am subject to the penalty of perjury. Have so qualified my testimony here today, I state on the record, for the record, that ... [whatever you want to say, such as: The affidavit I filed on such and such date is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.]"

Then, you sit down. NOW your have TESTIMONY ON THE RECORD, and if the other side does not try to refute it, then you will have the ONLY testimony on the record. If the other side starts to state their opinion, you say, "I object! Heresay!"

At that point, the ONLY "FACTS" that the judge can go on is what YOU stated in your TESTIMONY.

If the judge ignores that, and rules against you anyway, he has committed judicial error, which can be reversed. He has also violated your right if Due Process, which gives you a cause of action against him -- either a lawsuit or a compliant with the judicial review board, or both.

The REAL law ALWAYS provides a remedy.

This stuff goes back more than 1,000 years in England. They worked this all out. But our modern system has hidden it from us.

We don't need to worry about the Vatican or the ALL CAPS NAME.

We just need to learn the REAL LAW, as it is our RIGHT, which must be protected by the government, per the 9th Amendment to the Constitution (the ONLY amendment they NEVER want you to think about).

How were the American founding fathers able to declare independence from Britain, if they didn't ask for PERMISSION to break away?

Because they knew the LAW.

They knew their fundamental RIGHTS.

^ BTW, let me expand on this, because it was a SHOCKER to me when I learned it.

You simply SAYING this to a judge is ... HERESAY, and the judge can IGNORE it, as if you never said it.

You may have come across someone who said they told the judge, "The Constitution says this, or the law is that," and the judge just IGNORED what they said.

Ever hear of or read about that?

Of course.

WHY was the judge allowed to ignore it?

Because it was HERESAY.

ANY statement, whether oral or in writing, that is NOT testified to under oath, is HERESAY.

Usually, this is associated with something said outside of a courtroom. BUT it also applies to things said IN a courtroom.

ONLY testimony counts! EVERYTHING ELSE IS HERESAY.

The judge can listen to you, smile at you, and ... IGNORE you. Because what you said is heresay. It has ZERO RELEVANCE.

This ALSO applies to attorneys.

There is a famous court case, Trinsey v. Pagliaro, where it says that "statement of council (attorneys), oral or in writing (pleadings) are not sufficient for summary judgment."

This means that whatever the attorney says, whether they write it in their pleadings or say it in open court, are NOT testimony and, therefore, are NOT FACTS ON THE RECORD, NOR VALID LAW -- and the judge can ignore it, if he chooses to.

The difference is, it is a business. The judges and attorneys are both "in on it" and make their living from it. So, judges WILL pay attention to most attorneys, but they have NO REQUIREMENT to.

As for non-attorneys, they like to ignore us whenever they can.

BUT ... there is a solution!

(There is ALWAYS a remedy in the law!)

First, you can create an affidavit (but you have to learn how to do it right), stating whatever it is you want the judge to consider. The judge is not lawfully allowed to ignore an affidavit (though some will try).

But even that is not enough, because it still MUST be testified to IN COURT.

How do you do that if the judge will not let you be on the witness stand? Maybe what you are arguing is not yet at the point of a trial, so you are not legally entitled to just go on the witness stand whenever you want.

But you don't have to.

So second, after you have the affidavit in the record, you stand up where you are (you do not need the judge's permission to do this), and state:

"Your honor, I understand that I am required here today to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God, and that if I do not tell the truth, I am subject to the penalty of perjury. Have so qualified my testimony here today, I state on the record, for the record, that ... [whatever you want to say, such as: The affidavit I filed on such and such date is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.]"

Then, you sit down. NOW your have TESTIMONY ON THE RECORD, and if the other side does not try to refute it, then you will have the ONLY testimony on the record. If the other side starts to state their opinion, you say, "I object! Heresay!"

At that point, the ONLY "FACTS" that the judge can go on is what YOU stated in your TESTIMONY.

If the judge ignores that, and rules against you anyway, he has committed judicial error, which can be reversed. He has also violated your right if Due Process, which gives you a cause of action against him -- either a lawsuit or a compliant with the judicial review board, or both.

The REAL law ALWAYS provides a remedy.

This stuff goes back more than 1,000 years in England. They worked this all out. But our modern system has hidden it from us.

We don't need to worry about the Vatican or the ALL CAPS NAME.

We just need to learn the REAL LAW, as it is our RIGHT, which must be protected by the government, per the 9th Amendment to the Constitution (the ONLY amendment they NEVER want you to think about).

How were the American founding fathers able to declare independence from Britain, if they didn't ask for PERMISSION to break away?

Because they knew the LAW.

^ BTW, let me expand on this, because it was a SHOCKER to me when I learned it.

You simply SAYING this to a judge is ... HERESAY, and the judge can IGNORE it, as if you never said it.

You may have come across someone who said they told the judge, "The Constitution says this, or the law is that," and the judge just IGNORED what they said.

Ever hear of or read about that?

Of course.

WHY was the judge allowed to ignore it?

Because it was HERESAY.

ANY statement, whether oral or in writing, that is NOT testified to under oath, is HERESAY.

Usually, this is associated with something said outside of a courtroom. BUT it also applies to things said IN a courtroom.

ONLY testimony counts! EVERYTHING ELSE IS HERESAY.

The judge can listen to you, smile at you, and ... IGNORE you. Because what you said is heresay. It has ZERO RELEVANCE.

This ALSO applies to attorneys.

There is a famous court case, Trinsey v. Pagliaro, where it says that "statement of council (attorneys), oral or in writing (pleadings) are not sufficient for summary judgment."

This means that whatever the attorney says, whether they write it in their pleadings or say it in open court, are NOT testimony and, therefore, are NOT FACTS ON THE RECORD, NOR VALID LAW -- and the judge can ignore it, if he chooses to.

The difference is, it is a business. The judges and attorneys are both "in on it" and make their living from it. So, judges WILL pay attention to most attorneys, but they have NO REQUIREMENT to.

As for non-attorneys, they like to ignore us whenever they can.

BUT ... there is a solution!

(There is ALWAYS a remedy in the law!)

First, you can create an affidavit (but you have to learn how to do it right), stating whatever it is you want the judge to consider. The judge is not lawfully allowed to ignore an affidavit (though some will try).

But even that is not enough, because it still MUST be testified to IN COURT.

How do you do that if the judge will not let you be on the witness stand? Maybe what you are arguing is not yet at the point of a trial, so you are not legally entitled to just go on the witness stand whenever you want.

But you don't have to.

So second, after you have the affidavit in the record, you stand up where you are (you do not need the judge's permission to do this), and state:

"Your honor, I understand that I am required here today to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God, and that if I do not tell the truth, I am subject to the penalty of perjury. Have so qualified my testimony here today, I state on the record, for the record, that ... [whatever you want to say, such as: The affidavit I filed on such and such date is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.]"

Then, you sit down. NOW your have TESTIMONY ON THE RECORD, and if the other side does not try to refute it, then you will have the ONLY testimony on the record. If the other side starts to state their opinion, you say, "I object! Heresay!"

At that point, the ONLY "FACTS" that the judge can go on is what YOU stated in your TESTIMONY.

If the judge ignores that, and rules against you anyway, he has committed judicial error, which can be reversed. He has also violated your right if Due Process, which gives you a cause of action against him -- either a lawsuit or a compliant with the judicial review board, or both.

The REAL law ALWAYS provides a remedy.

This stuff goes back more than 1,000 years in England. They worked this all out. But our modern system has hidden it from us.

We don't need to worry about the Vatican or the ALL CAPS NAME.

We just need to learn the REAL LAW, as it is our RIGHT, which must be protected by the government, per the 9th Amendment to the Constitution (the ONLY amendment they NEVER want you to think about).

^ BTW, let me expand on this, because it was a SHOCKER to me when I learned it.

You simply SAYING this to a judge is ... HERESAY, and the judge can IGNORE it, as if you never said it.

You may have come across someone who said they told the judge, "The Constitution says this, or the law is that," and the judge just IGNORED what they said.

Ever hear of or read about that?

Of course.

WHY was the judge allowed to ignore it?

Because it was HERESAY.

ANY statement, whether oral or in writing, that is NOT testified to under oath, is HERESAY.

Usually, this is associated with something said outside of a courtroom. BUT it also applies to things said IN a courtroom.

ONLY testimony counts! EVERYTHING ELSE IS HERESAY.

The judge can listen to you, smile at you, and ... IGNORE you. Because what you said is heresay. It has ZERO RELEVANCE.

This ALSO applies to attorneys.

There is a famous court case, Trinsey v. Pagliaro, where it says that "statement of council (attorneys), oral or in writing (pleadings) are not sufficient for summary judgment."

This means that whatever the attorney says, whether they write it in their pleadings or say it in open court, are NOT testimony and, therefore, are NOT FACTS ON THE RECORD, NOR VALID LAW -- and the judge can ignore it, if he chooses to.

The difference is, it is a business. The judges and attorneys are both "in on it" and make their living from it. So, judges WILL pay attention to most attorneys, but they have NO REQUIREMENT to.

As for non-attorneys, they like to ignore us whenever they can.

BUT ... there is a solution!

(There is ALWAYS a remedy in the law!)

First, you can create an affidavit (but you have to learn how to do it right), stating whatever it is you want the judge to consider. The judge is not lawfully allowed to ignore an affidavit (though some will try).

But even that is not enough, because it still MUST be testified to IN COURT.

How do you do that if the judge will not let you be on the witness stand? Maybe what you are arguing is not yet at the point of a trial, so you are not legally entitled to just go on the witness stand whenever you want.

But you don't have to.

So second, after you have the affidavit in the record, you stand up where you are (you do not need the judge's permission to do this), and state:

"Your honor, I understand that I am required here today to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God, and that if I do not tell the truth, I am subject to the penalty of perjury. Have so qualified my testimony here today, I state on the record, for the record, that ... [whatever you want to say, such as: The affidavit I filed on such and such date is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.]"

Then, you sit down. NOW your have TESTIMONY ON THE RECORD, and if the other side does not try to refute it, then you will have the ONLY testimony on the record. If the other side starts to state their opinion, you say, "I object! Heresay!"

At that point, the ONLY "FACTS" that the judge can go on is what YOU stated in your TESTIMONY.

If the judge ignores that, and rules against you anyway, he has committed judicial error, which can be reversed. He has also violated your rights, which gives you a cause of action against him -- either a lawsuit or a compliant with the judicial review board, or both.

The REAL law ALWAYS provides a remedy.

This stuff goes back more than 1,000 years in England. They worked this all out. But our modern system has hidden it from us.

We don't need to worry about the Vatican or the ALL CAPS NAME.

We just need to learn the REAL LAW, as it is our RIGHT, which must be protected by the government, per the 9th Amendment to the Constitution (the ONLY amendment they NEVER want you to think about).

^ BTW, let me expand on this, because it was a SHOCKER to me when I learned it.

You simply SAYING this to a judge is ... HERESAY, and the judge can IGNORE it, as if you never said it.

You may have come across someone who said they told the judge, "The Constitution says this, or the law is that," and the judge just IGNORED what they said.

Ever hear of or read about that?

Of course.

WHY was the judge allowed to ignore it?

Because it was HERESAY.

ANY statement, whether oral or in writing, that is NOT testified to under oath, is HERESAY.

Usually, this is associated with something said outside of a courtroom. BUT it also applies to things said IN a courtroom.

ONLY testimony counts! EVERYTHING ELSE IS HERESAY.

The judge can listen to you, smile at you, and ... IGNORE you. Because what you said is heresay. It has ZERO RELEVANCE.

This ALSO applies to attorneys.

There is a famous court case, Trinsey v. Pagliaro, where it says that "statement of council (attorneys), oral or in writing (pleadings) are not sufficient for summary judgment."

This means that whatever the attorney says, whether they write it in their pleadings or say it in open court, are NOT testimony and, therefore, are NOT FACTS ON THE RECORD, NOR VALID LAW -- and the judge can ignore it, if he chooses to.

The difference is, it is a business. The judges and attorneys are both "in on it" and make their living from it. So, judges WILL pay attention to most attorneys, but they have NO REQUIREMENT to.

As for non-attorneys, they like to ignore us whenever they can.

BUT ... there is a solution!

(There is ALWAYS a remedy in the law!)

First, you can create an affidavit (but you have to learn how to do it right), stating whatever it is you want the judge to consider. The judge is not lawfully allowed to ignore an affidavit (though some will try).

But even that is not enough, because it still MUST be testified to IN COURT.

How do you do that if the judge will not let you be on the witness stand? Maybe what you are arguing is not yet at the point of a trial, so you are not legally entitled to just go on the witness stand whenever you want.

But you don't have to.

So second, after you have the affidavit in the record, you stand up where you are (you do not need the judge's permission to do this), and state:

"Your honor, I understand that I am required here today to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God, and that if I do not tell the truth, I am subject to the penalty of perjury. Have so qualified my testimony here today, I state on the record, for the record, that ... [whatever you want to say, such as: The affidavit I filed on such and such date is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.]"

Then, you sit down. NOW your have TESTIMONY ON THE RECORD, and if the other side does not try to refute it, then you will have the ONLY testimony on the record. If the other side starts to state their opinion, you say, "I object! Heresay!"

At that point, the ONLY "FACTS" that the judge can go on is what YOU stated in your TESTIMONY.

If the judge ignores that, and rules against you anyway, he has committed judicial error, which can be reversed. He has also you a cause of action against him -- either a lawsuit or a compliant with the judicial review board, or both.

The REAL law ALWAYS provides a remedy.

This stuff goes back more than 1,000 years in England. They worked this all out. But our modern system has hidden it from us.

We don't need to worry about the Vatican or the ALL CAPS NAME.

We just need to learn the REAL LAW, as it is our RIGHT, which must be protected by the government, per the 9th Amendment to the Constitution (the ONLY amendment they NEVER want you to think about).

^ BTW, let me expand on this, because it was a SHOCKER to me when I learned it.

You simply SAYING this to a judge is ... HERESAY, and the judge can IGNORE it, as if you never said it.

You may have come across someone who said they told the judge, "The Constitution says this, or the law is that," and the judge just IGNORED what they said.

Ever hear of or read about that?

Of course.

WHY was the judge allowed to ignore it?

Because it was HERESAY.

ANY statement, whether oral or in writing, that is NOT testified to under oath, is HERESAY.

Usually, this is associated with something said outside of a courtroom. BUT it also applies to things said IN a courtroom.

ONLY testimony counts! EVERYTHING ELSE IS HERESAY.

The judge can listen to you, smile at you, and ... IGNORE you. Because what you said is heresay. It has ZERO RELEVANCE.

This ALSO applies to attorneys.

There is a famous court case, Trinsey v. Pagliaro, where it says that "statement of council (attorneys), oral or in writing (pleadings) are not sufficient for summary judgment."

This means that whatever the attorney says, whether they write it in their pleadings or say it in open court, are NOT testimony and, therefore, are NOT FACTS ON THE RECORD, NOR VALID LAW -- and the judge can ignore it, if he chooses to.

The difference is, it is a business. The judges and attorneys are both "in on it" and make their living from it. So, judges WILL pay attention to most attorneys, but they have NO REQUIREMENT to.

As for non-attorneys, they like to ignore us whenever they can.

BUT ... there is a solution!

(There is ALWAYS a remedy in the law!)

First, you can create an affidavit (but you have to learn how to do it right), stating whatever it is you want the judge to consider. The judge is not lawfully allowed to ignore an affidavit (though some will try).

But even that is not enough, because it still MUST be testified to IN COURT.

How do you do that if the judge will not let you be on the witness stand? Maybe what you are arguing is not yet at the point of a trial, so you are not legally entitled to just go on the witness stand whenever you want.

But you don't have to.

So second, after you have the affidavit in the record, you stand up where you are (you do not need the judge's permission to do this), and state:

"Your honor, I understand that I am required here today to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God, and that if I do not tell the truth, I am subject to the penalty of perjury. Have so qualified my testimony here today, I state on the record, for the record, that ... [whatever you want to say, such as: The affidavit I filed on such and such date is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.]"

Then, you sit down. NOW your have TESTIMONY ON THE RECORD, and if they other side does not try to refute it, then you will have the ONLY testimony on the record. If the other side starts to state their opinion, you say, "I object! Heresay!"

At that point, the ONLY "FACTS" that the judge can go on is what YOU stated in your TESTIMONY.

If the judge ignores that, and rules against you anyway, he has committed judicial error, which can be reversed. He has also you a cause of action against him -- either a lawsuit or a compliant with the judicial review board, or both.

The REAL law ALWAYS provides a remedy.

This stuff goes back more than 1,000 years in England. They worked this all out. But our modern system has hidden it from us.

We don't need to worry about the Vatican or the ALL CAPS NAME.

We just need to learn the REAL LAW, as it is our RIGHT, which must be protected by the government, per the 9th Amendment to the Constitution (the ONLY amendment they NEVER want you to think about).

^ BTW, let me expand on this, because it was a SHOCKER to me when I learned it.

You simply SAYING this to a judge is ... HERESAY, and the judge can IGNORE it, as if you never said it.

You may have come across someone who said they told the judge, "The Constitution says this, or the law is that," and the judge just IGNORED what they said.

Ever hear of or read about that?

Of course.

WHY was the judge allowed to ignore it?

Because it was HERESAY.

ANY statement, whether oral or in writing, that is NOT testified to under oath, is HERESAY.

Usually, this is associated with something said outside of a courtroom. BUT it also applies to things said IN a courtroom.

ONLY testimony counts! EVERYTHING ELSE IS HERESAY.

The judge can listen to you, smile at you, and ... IGNORE you. Because what you said is heresay. It has ZERO RELEVANCE.

This ALSO applies to attorneys.

There is a famous court case, Trinsey v. Pagliaro, where it says that "statement of council (attorneys), oral or in writing (pleadings) are not sufficient for summary judgment."

This means that whatever the attorney says, whether they write it in their pleadings or say it in open court, are NOT testimony and, therefore, are NOT FACTS ON THE RECORD, NOR VALID LAW -- and the judge can ignore it, if he chooses to.

The difference is, it is a business. The judges and attorneys are both "in on it" and make their living from it. So, judges WILL pay attention to most attorneys, but they have NO REQUIREMENT to.

As for non-attorneys, they like to ignore us whenever they can.

BUT ... there is a solution!

(There is ALWAYS a remedy in the law!)

First, you can create an affidavit (but you have to learn how to do it right), stating whatever it is you want the judge to consider. The judge is not lawfully allowed to ignore an affidavit (though some will try).

But even that is not enough, because it still MUST be testified to IN COURT.

How do you do that if the judge will not let you be on the witness stand? Maybe what you are arguing is not yet at the point of a trial, so you are not legally entitled to just go on the witness stand whenever you want.

But you don't have to.

So second, after you have the affidavit in the record, you stand up where you are, raise your right hand (you do not need the judge's permission to do this), and state:

"Your honor, I understand that I am required here today to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God, and that if I do not tell the truth, I am subject to the penalty of perjury. Have so qualified my testimony here today, I state on the record, for the record, that ... [whatever you want to say, such as: The affidavit I filed on such and such date is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.]"

Then, you sit down. NOW your have TESTIMONY ON THE RECORD, and if they other side does not try to refute it, then you will have the ONLY testimony on the record. If the other side starts to state their opinion, you say, "I object! Heresay!"

At that point, the ONLY "FACTS" that the judge can go on is what YOU stated in your TESTIMONY.

If the judge ignores that, and rules against you anyway, he has committed judicial error, which can be reversed. He has also you a cause of action against him -- either a lawsuit or a compliant with the judicial review board, or both.

The REAL law ALWAYS provides a remedy.

This stuff goes back more than 1,000 years in England. They worked this all out. But our modern system has hidden it from us.

We don't need to worry about the Vatican or the ALL CAPS NAME.

We just need to learn the REAL LAW, as it is our RIGHT, which must be protected by the government, per the 9th Amendment to the Constitution (the ONLY amendment they NEVER want you to think about).

^ BTW, let me expand on this, because it was a SHOCKER to me when I learned it.

You simply SAYING this to a judge is ... HERESAY, and the judge can IGNORE it, as if you never said it.

You may have come across someone who said they told the judge, "The Constitution says this, or the law is that," and the judge just IGNORED what they said.

Ever hear of or read about that?

Of course.

WHY was the judge allowed to ignore it?

Because it was HERESAY.

ANY statement, whether oral or in writing, that is NOT testified to under oath, is HERESAY.

Usually, this is associated with something said outside of a courtroom. BUT it also applies to things said IN a courtroom.

ONLY testimony counts! EVERYTHING ELSE IS HERESAY.

The judge can listen to you, smile at you, and ... IGNORE you. Because what you said is heresay. It has ZERO RELEVANCE.

This ALSO applies to attorneys.

There is a famous court case, Trinsey v. Pagliaro, where it says that "statement of council (attorneys), oral or in writing (pleadings) are not sufficient for summary judgment."

This means that whatever the attorney says, whether they write it in their pleadings or say it in open court, are NOT testimony and, therefore, are NOT FACTS ON THE RECORD, NOR VALID LAW -- and the judge can ignore it, if he chooses to.

The difference is, it is a business. The judges and attorneys are both "in on it" and make their living from it. So, judges WILL pay attention to most attorneys, but they have NO REQUIREMENT to.

As for non-attorneys, they like to ignore us whenever they can.

BUT ... there is a solution!

(There is ALWAYS a remedy in the law!)

First, you can create an affidavit (but you have to learn how to do it right), stating whatever it is you want the judge to consider. The judge is not lawfully allowed to ignore an affidavit (though some will try).

But even that is not enough, because it still MUST be testified to IN COURT.

How do you do that if the judge will not let you be on the witness stand? Maybe what you are arguing is not yet at the point of a trial, so you are not legally entitled to just go on the witness stand whenever you want.

But you don't have to.

So second, after you have the affidavit in the record, you stand up where you are, raise your right hand (you do not need the judge's permission to do this), and state:

"Your honor, I understand that I am required here today to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God, and that if I do not tell the truth, I am subject to the penalty of perjury. Have so qualified my testimony here today, I state on the record, for the record, that ... [whatever you want to say, such as: The affidavit I filed on such and such date is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.]"

Then, you sit down. NOW your have TESTIMONY ON THE RECORD, and if they other side does not try to refute it, then you will have the ONLY testimony on the record. If the other side starts to state their opinion, you say, "I object! Heresay!"

At that point, the ONLY "FACTS" that the judge can go on is what YOU stated in your TESTIMONY.

If the judge ignores that, and rules against you anyway, he has committed judicial error, which can be reversed. He has also you a cause of action against him -- either a lawsuit or a compliant with the judicial review board, or both.

The REAL law ALWAYS provides a remedy.

This stuff goes back more than 1,000 years in England. They worked this all out. But our modern system has hidden it from us.

We don't need to worry about the Vatican or the ALL CAPS NAME.

We just need to learn the REAL LAW, as it is our RIGHT, which must be protectd by the government, per the 9th Amendment to the Constitution (the ONLY amendment they NEVER want you to think about).

^ BTW, let me expand on this, because it was a SHOCKER to me when I learned it.

You simply SAYING this to a judge is ... HERESAY, and the judge can IGNORE it, as if you never said it.

You may have come across someone who said they told the judge, "The Constitution says this, or the law is that," and the judge just IGNORED what they said.

Ever hear of or read about that?

Of course.

WHY was the judge allowed to ignore it?

Because it was HERESAY.

ANY statement, whether oral or in writing, that is NOT testified to under oath, is HERESAY.

Usually, this is associated with something said outside of a courtroom. BUT it also applies to things said IN a courtroom.

ONLY testimony counts! EVERYTHING ELSE IS HERESAY.

The judge can listen to you, smile at you, and ... IGNORE you. Because what you said is heresay. It has ZERO RELEVANCE.

This ALSO applies to attorneys.

There is a famous court case, Trinsey v. Pagliaro, where it says that "statement of council (attorneys), oral or in writing (pleadings) are not sufficient for summary judgment."

This means that whatever the attorney says, whether they write it in their pleadings or say it in open court, are NOT testimony and, therefore, are NOT FACTS ON THE RECORD, NOR VALID LAW -- and the judge can ignore it, if he chooses to.

The difference is, it is a business. The judges and attorneys are both "in on it" and make their living from it. So, judges WILL pay attention to most attorneys, but they have NO REQUIREMENT to.

As for non-attorneys, they like to ignore us whenever they can.

BUT ... there is a solution!

(There is ALWAYS a remedy in the law!)

First, you can create an affidavit (but you have to learn how to do it right), stating whatever it is you want the judge to consider. The judge is not lawfully allowed to ignore an affidavit (though some will try).

But even that is not enough, because it still MUST be testified to IN COURT.

How do you do that if the judge will not let you be on the witness stand? Maybe what you are arguing is not yet at the point of a trial, so you are not legally entitled to just go on the witness stand whenever you want.

But you don't have to.

So second, after you have the affidavit in the record, you stand up where you are, raise your right hand (you do not need the judge's permission to do this), and state:

"Your honor, I understand that I am required here today to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God, and that if I do not tell the truth, I am subject to the penalty of perjury. Have so qualified my testimony here today, I state on the record, for the record, that ... [whatever you want to say, such as: The affidavit I filed on such and such date is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.]"

Then, you sit down. NOW your have TESTIMONY ON THE RECORD, and if they other side does not try to refute it, then you will have the ONLY testimony on the record. If the other side starts to state their opinion, you say, "I object! Heresay!"

At that point, the ONLY "FACTS" that the judge can go on is what YOU stated in your TESTIMONY.

If the judge ignores that, and rules against you anyway, he has committed judicial error that can be reversed, and has given you cause for a cause of action against him -- either a lawsuit or a compliant with the judical review board, or both.

The REAL law ALWAYS provides a remedy.

This stuff goes back more than 1,000 years in England. They worked this all out. But our modern system has hidden it from us.

We don't need to worry about the Vatican or the ALL CAPS NAME.

We just need to learn the REAL LAW, as it is our RIGHT, which must be protectd by the government, per the 9th Amendment to the Constitution (the ONLY amendment they NEVER want you to think about).

^ BTW, let me expand on this, because it was a SHOCKER to me when I learned it.

You simply SAYING this to a judge is ... HERESAY, and the judge can IGNORE it, as if you never said it.

You may have come across someone who said they told the judge, "The Constitution says this, or the law is that," and the judge just IGNORED what they said.

Ever hear of or read about that?

Of course.

WHY was the judge allowed to ignore it?

Because it was HERESAY.

ANY statement, whether oral or in writing, that is NOT testified to under oath, is HERESAY.

Usually, this is associated with something said outside of a courtroom. BUT it also applies to things said IN a courtroom, IF it is not testimony.

ONLY testimony counts! EVERYTHING ELSE IS HERESAY.

The judge can listen to you, smile at you, and ... IGNORE you. Because what you said is heresay. It has ZERO RELEVANCE.

This ALSO applies to attorneys.

There is a famous court case, Trinsey v. Pagliaro, where it says that "statement of council (attorneys), oral or in writing (pleadings) are not sufficient for summary judgment."

This means that whatever the attorney says, whether they write it in their pleadings or say it in open court, are NOT testimony and, therefore, are NOT FACTS ON THE RECORD, NOR VALID LAW -- and the judge can ignore it, if he chooses to.

The difference is, it is a business. The judges and attorneys are both "in on it" and make their living from it. So, judges WILL pay attention to most attorneys, but they have NO REQUIREMENT to.

As for non-attorneys, they like to ignore us whenever they can.

BUT ... there is a solution!

(There is ALWAYS a remedy in the law!)

First, you can create an affidavit (but you have to learn how to do it right), stating whatever it is you want the judge to consider. The judge is not lawfully allowed to ignore an affidavit (though some will try).

But even that is not enough, because it still MUST be testified to IN COURT.

How do you do that if you that if the judge will not let you be on the witness stand? Maybe what you are arguing is not yet at the point of a trial, so you are not legally entitled to just go on the witness stand whenever you want.

But you don't have to.

So second, after you have the affidavit in the record, you stand up where you are, raise your right hand (you do not need the judge's permission to do this), and state:

"Your honor, I understand that I am required here today to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God, and that if I do not tell the truth, I am subject to the penalty of perjury. Have so qualified my testimony here today, I state on the record, for the record, that ... [whatever you want to say, such as: The affidavit I filed on such and such date is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.]"

Then, you sit down. NOW your have TESTIMONY ON THE RECORD, and if they other side does not try to refute it, then you will have the ONLY testimony on the record. If the other side starts to state their opinion, you say, "I object! Heresay!"

At that point, the ONLY "FACTS" that the judge can go on is what YOU stated in your TESTIMONY.

If the judge ignores that, and rules against you anyway, he has committed judicial error that can be reversed, and has given you cause for a cause of action against him -- either a lawsuit or a compliant with the judical review board, or both.

The REAL law ALWAYS provides a remedy.

This stuff goes back more than 1,000 years in England. They worked this all out. But our modern system has hidden it from us.

We don't need to worry about the Vatican or the ALL CAPS NAME.

We just need to learn the REAL LAW, as it is our RIGHT, which must be protectd by the government, per the 9th Amendment to the Constitution (the ONLY amendment they NEVER want you to think about).

^ BTW, let me expand on this, because it was a SHOCKER to me when I learned it.

You simply SAYING this to a judge is ... HERESAY, and the judge can IGNORE it, as if you never said it.

You may have come across someone who said they told the judge, "The Constitution says this, or the law is that," and the judge just IGNORED what they said.

Ever hear of or read about that?

Of course.

WHY was the judge allowed to ignore it?

Because it was HERESAY.

ANY statement, whether oral or in writing, that is NOT testified to under oath, is HERESAY.

Usually, this is associated with something said outside of a courtroom. BUT it also applies to things said IN a courtroom, IF it is not testimony.

ONLY testimony counts! EVERYTHING ELSE IS HERESAY.

The judge can listen to you, smile at you, and ... IGNORE you. Because what you said is heresay. It has ZERO RELEVANCE.

This ALSO applies to attorneys.

There is a famous court case, Trinsey v. Pagliaro, where it says that "statement of council (attorneys), oral or in writing (pleadings) are not sufficient for summary judgment."

This means that whatever the attorney says, whether they write it in their pleadings or say it in open court, are NOT testimony and, therefore, are NOT something the judge MUST consider.

The difference is, it is a business. The judges and attorneys are both "in on it" and make their living from it. So, judges WILL pay attention to most attorneys, but they have NO REQUIREMENT to.

As for non-attorneys, they like to ignore us whenever they can.

BUT ... there is a solution!

(There is ALWAYS a remedy in the law!)

First, you can create an affidavit (but you have to learn how to do it right), stating whatever it is you want the judge to consider. The judge is not lawfully allowed to ignore an affidavit (though some will try).

But even that is not enough, because it still MUST be testified to IN COURT.

How do you do that if you that if the judge will not let you be on the witness stand? Maybe what you are arguing is not yet at the point of a trial, so you are not legally entitled to just go on the witness stand whenever you want.

But you don't have to.

So second, after you have the affidavit in the record, you stand up where you are, raise your right hand (you do not need the judge's permission to do this), and state:

"Your honor, I understand that I am required here today to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God, and that if I do not tell the truth, I am subject to the penalty of perjury. Have so qualified my testimony here today, I state on the record, for the record, that ... [whatever you want to say, such as: The affidavit I filed on such and such date is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.]"

Then, you sit down. NOW your have TESTIMONY ON THE RECORD, and if they other side does not try to refute it, then you will have the ONLY testimony on the record. If the other side starts to state their opinion, you say, "I object! Heresay!"

At that point, the ONLY "FACTS" that the judge can go on is what YOU stated in your TESTIMONY.

If the judge ignores that, and rules against you anyway, he has committed judicial error that can be reversed, and has given you cause for a cause of action against him -- either a lawsuit or a compliant with the judical review board, or both.

The REAL law ALWAYS provides a remedy.

This stuff goes back more than 1,000 years in England. They worked this all out. But our modern system has hidden it from us.

We don't need to worry about the Vatican or the ALL CAPS NAME.

We just need to learn the REAL LAW, as it is our RIGHT, which must be protectd by the government, per the 9th Amendment to the Constitution (the ONLY amendment they NEVER want you to think about).