Folks, time to put up or shut up. This is a quick video which provides specific EOs, documents etc. Time to do some digging and verify whether what he says about each document and the timing is correct or not.
Once Anons have confirmed that the objective content in this clip is correct, we can debate whether that implies Trump is the CIC or not, according to this.
Documents:
Law of war - June 2015
Military Justice Act 2016, and indeed put into effect in 2017 as NDAA
Federal Continuity Directive 1 Jan 17 2017
FCD 2 June 2017
Latest FCD Dec 2023
EO 13961 issues continuity directives
Does it show how all 3 branches of government are under the CIC in a Continuity of Government setting?
Did Trump effectively declare War conditions under this? This claim seems to be very shaky
To provide additional authority to the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security to respond to the national emergency declared by Proclamation 9994, the authorities under section 12302 of title 10, United States Code, and sections 2127, 2308, 2314, and 3735 of title 14, United States Code, are invoked and made available, according to their terms, to the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security
...
The Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, at the direction of the Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, are authorized to order to active duty not to exceed 24 consecutive months
10 U.S. Code § 2127: Training
2308: Renamed - Acquisition of military equipment
2314: Repealed in 2022
14 U.S. Code § 3735 - Authorized number of officers
Folks, time to put up or shut up. This is a quick video which provides specific EOs, documents etc. Time to do some digging and verify whether what he says about each document and the timing is correct or not.
Once Anons have confirmed that the objective content in this clip is correct, we can debate whether that implies Trump is the CIC or not, according to this.
Documents:
Law of war - June 2015
Military Justice Act 2016, and indeed put into effect in 2017 as NDAA
Federal Continuity Directive 1 Jan 17 2017
FCD 2 June 2017
Latest FCD Dec 2023
EO 13961 issues continuity directives
Does it show how all 3 branches of government are under the CIC in a Continuity of Government setting?
Did Trump effectively declare War conditions under this? This claim seems to be very shaky
To provide additional authority to the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security to respond to the national emergency declared by Proclamation 9994, the authorities under section 12302 of title 10, United States Code, and sections 2127, 2308, 2314, and 3735 of title 14, United States Code, are invoked and made available, according to their terms, to the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security
...
The Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, at the direction of the Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, are authorized to order to active duty not to exceed 24 consecutive months
[10 U.S. Code § 2127]](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/2127): Training
2308: Renamed - Acquisition of military equipment
2314: Repealed in 2022
14 U.S. Code § 3735 - Authorized number of officers
Folks, time to put up or shut up. This is a quick video which provides specific EOs, documents etc. Time to do some digging and verify whether what he says about each document and the timing is correct or not.
Once Anons have confirmed that the objective content in this clip is correct, we can debate whether that implies Trump is the CIC or not, according to this.
Documents:
Law of war - June 2015
Military Justice Act 2016, and indeed put into effect in 2017 as NDAA
Federal Continuity Directive 1 Jan 17 2017
FCD 2 June 2017
Latest FCD Dec 2023
EO 13961 issues continuity directives
Does it show how all 3 branches of government are under the CIC in a Continuity of Government setting?
Did Trump effectively declare War conditions under this? This claim seems to be very shaky
To provide additional authority to the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security to respond to the national emergency declared by Proclamation 9994, the authorities under section 12302 of title 10, United States Code, and sections 2127, 2308, 2314, and 3735 of title 14, United States Code, are invoked and made available, according to their terms, to the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security
[10 U.S. Code § 2127]](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/2127): Training
2308: Renamed - Acquisition of military equipment
2314: Repealed in 2022
14 U.S. Code § 3735 - Authorized number of officers
Folks, time to put up or shut up. This is a quick video which provides specific EOs, documents etc. Time to do some digging and verify whether what he says about each document and the timing is correct or not.
Once Anons have confirmed that the objective content in this clip is correct, we can debate whether that implies Trump is the CIC or not, according to this.
Documents:
Law of war - June 2015
Military Justice Act 2016, and indeed put into effect in 2017 as NDAA
Federal Continuity Directive 1 Jan 17 2017
FCD 2 June 2017
Latest FCD Dec 2023
EO 13961 issues continuity directives
Does it show how all 3 branches of government are under the CIC in a Continuity of Government setting?
Did Trump effectively declare War conditions under this?
To provide additional authority to the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security to respond to the national emergency declared by Proclamation 9994, the authorities under section 12302 of title 10, United States Code, and sections 2127, 2308, 2314, and 3735 of title 14, United States Code, are invoked and made available, according to their terms, to the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security
[10 U.S. Code § 2127]](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/2127): Training
2308: Renamed - Acquisition of military equipment
2314: Repealed in 2022
14 U.S. Code § 3735 - Authorized number of officers
Folks, time to put up or shut up. This is a quick video which provides specific EOs, documents etc. Time to do some digging and verify whether what he says about each document and the timing is correct or not.
Once Anons have confirmed that the objective content in this clip is correct, we can debate whether that implies Trump is the CIC or not, according to this.