Wait just one minute here.

Are you saying that whether you call Soros a Nazi or a Jew, you’re right, but also whether you call him a Nazi or a Jew, you’re wrong, and also if you call him a Nazi, you can be called an anti-Semite, but if you don’t call him a Nazi you can’t call out his crimes, and that you’re an anti-Semite for calling out his crimes even though his crimes were against Jews, and that it’s ridiculous to call him a Nazi because he’s Jewish and works with a ton of Jews, and that pointing out his banking connections might also make one anti-Semitic because those banking connections are heavily Jewish in some way?

That doesn’t sound like any kind of five-way bind that enemies of God and Man would try to create to gain power over anyone while intentionally hiding their own crimes so they can commit more of them.

You must be one of them anti-Semites.

Maybe we should also work on cleaning up this language to where things can be stated that are logically coherent.

Wait just one minute here.

Are you saying that whether you call Soros a Nazi or a Jew, you’re right, but also whether you call him a Nazi or a Jew, you’re wrong, and also if you call him a Nazi, you can be called an anti-Semite, but if you don’t call him a Nazi you can’t call out his crimes, and that you’re an anti-Semite for calling out his crimes even though his crimes were against Jews, and that it’s ridiculous to call him a Nazi because he’s Jewish and works with a ton of Jews, and that pointing out his banking connections might also make one anti-Semitic because those banking connections are heavily Jewish in some way?

That doesn’t sound like any kind of five-way bind that enemies of God and Man would try to create to gain power over anyone while intentionally hiding their own crimes so they can commit more of them.

You must be one of them anti-Semites.