I second that. Even talk of “execution for treason” is not helpful right now, especially in light of recent fabricated verdicts and crimes. Stick to “tried for actual crimes”, imo. We get to a legit public trial of Deep State actors, regardless of sentence, that is a win.

“Execution for treason” is a high standard and maximum sentence for a reason. Asset confiscation and deportation of “foreign agents” is the more likely “bulk remedy” that will get implemented (public in 2025?). Mass executions is what Deep State wants to do to us. Best not to give them THAT public precedent, even if warranted.

I second that. Even talk of “execution for treason” is not helpful right now, especially in light of recent fabricated verdicts and crimes. Stick to “tried for actual crimes”, imo. We get to a legit public trial of Deep State actors, regardless of sentence, that is a win.

“Execution for treason” is a high standard and maximum sentence for a reason. Asset confiscation and deportation of “foreign agents” is the more likely “bulk remedy” that will get implemented. Mass executions is what Deep State wants to do to us. Best not to give them THAT public precedent, even if warranted.

I second that. Even talk of “execution for treason” is not helpful right now, especially in light of recent fabricated verdicts and crimes. Stick to “tried for actual crimes”, imo. We get to a legit trial of Deep State actors, regardless of sentence, that is a win.

“Execution for treason” is a high standard and maximum sentence for a reason. Asset confiscation and deportation of “foreign agents” is the more likely “bulk remedy” that will get implemented. Mass executions is what Deep State wants to do to us. Best not to give them THAT public precedent, even if warranted.

I second that. Even talk of “execution for treason” is not helpful right now, especially in light of recent fabricated verdicts and crimes. Stick to “tried for actual crimes”, imo. We get to a legit trial of Deep State actors, regardless of sentence, that is a win.