Is it blatant?

If you're on crack you're a liability (his history is proof of this.) Gun shops don't want that liability on them. If I owned a gun shop I would want that question and I would want it enforced under perjury. I wouldn't want to sell to drug addicts.

The only thing that was blatant was his crack use. Don't smoke crack if you want to purchase a gun from an FFL.

People want Rights but the don't want the responsibilities that come with them.

Is it blatant?

If you're on crack you're a liability (his history is proof of this.) Gun shops don't want that liability on them. If I owned a gun shop I would want that question and I would want it enforced under perjury. I wouldn't want to sell to drug addicts.

The only thing that was blatant was his crack use. Don't smoke crack if you want to purchase a gun from an FFL.