Nah I get all that. We’ve had this conversation before and your case is plausible.

I don’t have a firm conclusion on it, and certainly haven’t changed my language usage.

There are likely mixes of genuine and fake involved. It’s still weird, and will take a lot of working out a lot of details to come to any conclusions - the digging I was referring to.

All group study exercises are a little weird. “What makes this guy [job role]?” “Well, he [wear costume] and [know lingo] and [repeat some basic concepts], so [authoritative]”, but that same person will reject a hobbyist with heavy expertise but no costume as less authoritative. Stuff just gets weird in this area, as the practice itself is often essentially trying to define a shade of gray as black or white.

Nah I get all that. We’ve had this conversation before and your case is plausible.

I don’t have a firm conclusion on it, and certainly haven’t changed my language usage.

There are likely mixes of genuine and fake involved. It’s still weird, and will take a lot of working out a lot of details to come to any conclusions - the digging I was referring to.

All group study exercises are a little weird. “What makes this guy [job role]?” “Well, he [wear costume] and [know lingo] and [repeat some basic concepts], so [authoritative]”, but that same person will reject a hobbyist with heavy expertise but no costume as less authoritative. Stuff just gets weird in this area.

Nah I get all that. We’ve had this conversation before and your case is plausible.

I don’t have a firm conclusion on it, and certainly haven’t changed my language usage.

There are likely mixes of genuine and fake involved. It’s still weird, and will take a lot of working out a lot of details to come to any conclusions - the digging I was referring to.

All group study exercises are a little weird. “What makes this guy [job role]?” “Well, he [wear costume] and [know lingo] and [repeat some basic concepts], so [authoritative]”, but that same person will reject a hobbyist with no costume as less authoritative. Stuff just gets weird in this area.

Nah I get all that. We’ve had this conversation before and your case is plausible.

I don’t have a firm conclusion on it, and certainly haven’t changed my language usage.

There are likely mixes of genuine and fake involved. It’s still weird, and will take a lot of working out a lot of details to come to any conclusions - the digging I was referring to.

All group study exercises are a little weird.

Nah I get all that. We’ve had this conversation before and your case is plausible.

I don’t have a firm conclusion on it, and certainly haven’t changed my language usage.

There are likely mixes of genuine and fake involved. It’s still weird, and will take a lot of working out a lot of details to come to any conclusions - the digging I was referring to.