It's very interesting to me to see how the FBI describes this so casually compared to how folks on the Internet portray it. I'm not sure exactly where this really falls.

On the one hand it was a total propaganda move of the FBI to have those "Classified documents" folders in the photos they released, basically prejudicing every possible person that saw it

But on the other hand, you know how when you see crime scene photos with shell casings how they have little numbered placards next to them? If I were a juror would I conclude they tampered with the crime scene by adding those? No, not unless the coroner concluded the victim died as a result of injuries from placards.

It's very interesting to me to see how the FBI describes this so casually compared to how folks on the Internet portray it. I'm not sure exactly where this really falls.

On the one hand it was a total propaganda move of the FBI to have those "Classified documents" folders in the photos they released, basically prejudicing every possible person that saw it

But on the other hand, you know how when you see crime scene photos with shell casings how they have little numbered placards next to them? If I were a juror would I conclude they tampered with the crime scene by adding those?

It's very interesting to me to see how the FBI describes this so casually compared to how folks on the Internet portray it. I'm not sure exactly where this really falls. On the one hand it was a total propaganda move of the FBI to have those "Classified documents" folders in the photos they released, basically prejudicing every possible person that saw it. But on the other hand, you know how when you see crime scene photos with shell casings how they have little numbered placards next to them? If I were a juror would I conclude they tampered with the crime scene by adding those?

It's very interesting to me to see how the FBI describes this so casually compared to how folks on the Internet portray it.