This line of reasoning makes no sense to me. Basically what your argument comes down to is guilt by association and wanting to completely reject evidence in this case because of the reputation of the PTB at the FBI.

Your assessment of the argument is close, but not quite accurate. Part of that problem is my fault for the choice of wording I used to try to abbreviate the issues as I see it.

When I claim that the FIB's politicized "get Trump" targeting, and abuses of power relating to Trump, and many of his associates, I do not mean that the entirety of the FIB shares that "get Trump" agenda. So, guilt by association does not apply to the entire FBI.

However, we do have concrete proof, in addition to vast amounts of circumstantial evidence that show many agents within the FIB do indeed have a malicious anti-Trump bias. That bias has also been responsible for numerous ethical (and un prosecuted criminal) violations in the recent past. Strozk, Page, Clapper, Comey, Ohr, etc. etc.

Therefore, when we see yet again mishandled evidence, and breeches of protocol coming from the FIB, resulting in political harm to Trump, we can (and we had better) challenge the motives of the specific FBI, and DoJ persons involved in mis-handling the Trump case. This violation of protocol, and ethics against Trump, by the FIB fits an established pattern of behavior.

That is why we can claim the fabricated coversheets represent maliciously tainted evidence, and in no way indicates that those photos are of classified documents. We can show that the coversheets were in fact used to taint the alleged evidence. That is called tampering with evidence.

This line of reasoning makes no sense to me. Basically what your argument comes down to is guilt by association and wanting to completely reject evidence in this case because of the reputation of the PTB at the FBI.

Your assessment of the argument is close, but not quite accurate. Part of that problem is my fault for the choice of wording I used to try to abbreviate the issues as I see it.

When I claim that the FIB's politicized "get Trump" targeting, and abuses of power relating to Trump, and many of his associates, I do not mean that the entirety of the FIB shares that "get Trump" agenda. So, guilt by association does not apply to the entire FBI.

However, we do have concrete proof, in addition to vast amounts of circumstantial evidence that show many agents within the FIB do indeed have a malicious anti-Trump bias. That bias has also been responsible for numerous ethical (and un prosecuted criminal) violations in the recent past. Strozk, Page, Clapper, Comey, Ohr, etc. etc.

Therefore, when we see yet again mishandled evidence, and breeches of protocol coming from the FIB, resulting in political harm to Trump, we can (and we had better) challenge the motives of the specific FBI, and DoJ persons involved in mis-handling the Trump case.

That is why we can claim the fabricated coversheets represent maliciously tainted evidence, and in no way indicates that those photos are of classified documents. We can show that the coversheets were in fact used to taint the alleged evidence. That is called tampering with evidence.