Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Galatians 2:16 (KJV)

16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

The term "works of the law" meant rituals, sacrifices and ceremonies.

Galatians is a letter written by Paul to the Galatea. Diodorus Siculus, a Greek historian of the time, said these people were tall, blond, and of very white skin. These people would become the Germans.

Paul had once been a Pharisee, but he repented and turned to Christ.

The Pharisees followed the Tradition of the Elders, which would become the Talmud.

Paul wrote Galatians to tell them to stop their paganism (their "works of the law" -- as in Talmudic law), and return to God by way of Christ. They were Israelites, and he was explaining to them who they were, and how they should worship their God.

Later, the Roman Catholic Church would make "works of the law" their doctrine, which was also wrong.

Paul was basically saying the same thing that Martin Luther would say almost 1,500 years later.

Besides that, you are doing nothing but cut-and-paste, and you offer no analysis or discussion in your own words.

I think it is very disrespectful of you, if I offer my analysis (whether you agree or not), and all you respond with is cut-and-paste. Very disrespectful.

So, I won't bother continuing.

7 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Galatians 2:16 (KJV)

16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

The term "works of the law" meant rituals, sacrifices and ceremonies.

Galatians is a letter written by Paul to the Galatea. Diodorus Siculus, a Greek historian of the time, said these people were tall, blond, and of very white skin. These people would become the Germans.

Paul had once been a Pharisee, but he repented and turned to Christ.

The Pharisees followed the Tradition of the Elders, which would become the Talmud.

Paul wrote Galatians to tell them to stop their paganism (their "works of the law" -- as in Talmudic law), and return to God by way of Christ. They were Israelites, and he was explaining to them who they were, and how they should worship their God.

Later, the Roman Catholic Church would make "works of the law" their doctrine, which was also wrong.

Paul was basically saying the same thing that Martin Luther would say almost 1,500 years later.

Besides that, you are doing nothing but cut-and-paste, and you offer no analysis or discussion in your own words.

So, I won't bother continuing.

7 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Galatians 2:16 (KJV)

16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

The term "works of the law" meant rituals, sacrifices and ceremonies.

Galatians is a letter written by Paul to the Galatea. Diodorus Siculus, a Greek historian of the time, said these people were tall, blond, and of very white skin. These people would become the Germans.

Paul had once been a Pharisee, but he repented and turned to Christ.

The Pharisees followed the Tradition of the Elders, which would become the Talmud.

Paul wrote Galatians to tell them to stop their paganism (their "works of the law" -- as in Talmudic law), and return to God by way of Christ. They were Israelites, and he was explaining to them who they were, and how they should worship their God.

Later, the Roman Catholic Church would make "works of the law" their doctrine, which was also wrong.

Besides that, you are doing nothing but cut-and-paste, and you offer no analysis or debate of your own.

So, I won't bother continuing.

7 days ago
1 score