Obviously you'd be stupid to irradiate yourself if some safe and simple anti-parasitic and other chemicals can cure you.
But,help me puzzle this out. Breast cancer has one of the highest survival rates of all cancers with 10 year survival rate of nearly 90%, yet the vast majority of people who get it are treated with radiation, chemo, or both. If those three treatments were designed to kill people, why does that cancer have higher survival rates than other cancers that are LESS likely to be treated with those designed to kill processes? That suggests the cancer is more likely to kill you than chemo or radiation, right?
75% of people with stage 1 and 2 are treated with radiation, chemo, or both. 88% of stage 3 get radiation, chemo, or both. Stage 4 has 67% getting radiation, chemo, or both (a full 28% appear to do none of the traditional medical interventions).
Uterine cancer has a lower survival rate, yet 69% of people with stage 1 or 2 are treated with surgery alone.
So help me out here. Breast cancer has one of the highest survival rates of all cancers with 10 year survival rate of nearly 90%, yet the vast majority of people who get it are treated with radiation, chemo, or both. If those three treatments were designed to kill people, why does that cancer have higher survival rates than other cancers that are LESS likely to be treated with those designed to kill processes?
75% of people with stage 1 and 2 are treated with radiation, chemo, or both. 88% of stage 3 get radiation, chemo, or both. Stage 4 has 67% getting radiation, chemo, or both (a full 28% appear to do none of the traditional medical interventions).
Uterine cancer has a lower survival rate, yet 69% of people with stage 1 or 2 are treated with surgery alone.