We have to break their word spells.

“Stop taking the high road with these intolerant people” = “become more intolerant of these intolerant people” = “accept that intolerance is a negative trait” = “hypocrisy increases”

Intolerance is good if it is of bad actions. Bigotry is good if it is of bad ideas. Hate is good if it is toward evil, per the Bible:

Amos 5:15 Hate evil, love good, And establish justice in the courts. It may be that the LORD, the God Tzva'ot, will be gracious to the remnant of Yosef."

Words become gibberish words in terms of connotation when you can’t be against them without being them. It’s a linguistic Chinese finger cuff trap to increase hypocrisy and confusion, which sow division.

How they keep their blinders on is THE question. I had a post a while back about how apparently some large portion of humanity doesn’t have an inner monologue, but I don’t think that’s THE root, just a branch of the corrupted tree. Is our job to lead them somehow to act in righteousness, though they haven’t evaluated it of their own accord? Is the inner monologue really a ongoing discussion of our souls with the Holy Spirit? Does that mean they simply haven’t been saved by the Lord of Hosts? (why that Name? What is a “host”?)

To be determined…

We have to break their word spells.

“Stop taking the high road with these intolerant people” = “become more intolerant of these intolerant people” = “accept that intolerance is a negative trait” = “hypocrisy increases”

Intolerance is good if it is of bad actions. Bigotry is good if it is of bad ideas. Hate is good if it is toward evil, per the Bible:

Amos 5:15 Hate evil, love good, And establish justice in the courts. It may be that the LORD, the God Tzva'ot, will be gracious to the remnant of Yosef."

Words become gibberish words in terms of connotation when you can’t be against them without being them. It’s a linguistic Chinese finger cuff trap to increase hypocrisy and confusion, which sow division.

How they keep their blinders on is THE question. I had a post a while back about how apparently some large portion of humanity doesn’t have an inner monologue, but I don’t think that’s THE root, just a branch of the corrupted tree. Is our job to lead them somehow to act in righteousness, though they haven’t evaluated it of their own accord? Is the inner monologue really a ongoing discussion of our souls with the Holy Spirit? Does that mean they simply haven’t been saved by the Lord of Hosts? (why that Name?)

To be determined…

We have to break their word spells.

“Stop taking the high road with these intolerant people” = “become more intolerant of these intolerant people” = “accept that intolerance is a negative trait” = “hypocrisy increases”

Intolerance is good if it is of bad actions. Bigotry is good if it is of bad ideas. Hate is good if it is toward evil, per the Bible:

Amos 5:15 Hate evil, love good, And establish justice in the courts. It may be that the LORD, the God Tzva'ot, will be gracious to the remnant of Yosef."

Words become gibberish words in terms of connotation when you can’t be against them without being them. It’s a linguistic Chinese finger cuff trap to increase hypocrisy and confusion, which sow division.

How they keep their blinders on is THE question. I had a post a while back about how apparently some large portion of humanity doesn’t have an inner monologue, but I don’t think that’s THE root, just a branch of the corrupted tree. Is our job to lead them somehow to act in righteousness, though they haven’t evaluated it of their own accord? Is the inner monologue really a ongoing discussion of our souls with the Holy Spirit? Does that mean they simply haven’t been saved by the Lord of Hosts? (why that name?)

To be determined…

We have to break their word spells.

“Stop taking the high road with these intolerant people” = “become more intolerant of these intolerant people” = “accept that intolerance is a negative trait” = “hypocrisy increases”

Intolerance is good if it is of bad actions. Bigotry is good if it is of bad ideas. Hate is good if it is toward evil, per the Bible:

Amos 5:15 Hate evil, love good, And establish justice in the courts. It may be that the LORD, the God Tzva'ot, will be gracious to the remnant of Yosef."

Words become gibberish words in terms of connotation when you can’t be against them without being them. It’s a linguistic Chinese finger cuff trap to increase hypocrisy and confusion, which sow division.

How they keep their blinders on is THE question. I had a post a while back about how apparently some large portion of humanity doesn’t have an inner monologue, but I don’t think that’s THE root, just a branch of the corrupted tree. Is our job to lead them somehow to act in righteousness, though they haven’t evaluated it of their own accord? Is the inner monologue really a ongoing discussion of our souls with the Holy Spirit? Does that mean they simply haven’t been saved?

To be determined…

We have to break their word spells.

“Stop taking the high road with these intolerant people” = “become more intolerant of these intolerant people” = “accept that intolerance is a negative trait” = “hypocrisy increases”

Intolerance is good if it is of bad actions. Bigotry is good if it is of bad ideas. Hate is good if it is toward evil, per the Bible:

Amos 5:15 Hate evil, love good, And establish justice in the courts. It may be that the LORD, the God Tzva'ot, will be gracious to the remnant of Yosef."

Words become gibberish words in terms of connotation when you can’t be against them without being them. It’s a linguistic Chinese finger cuff trap to increase hypocrisy and confusion, which sow division.

How they keep their blinders on is THE question. I had a post a while back about how apparently some large portion of humanity doesn’t have an inner monologue, but I don’t think that’s THE root, just a branch of the corrupted tree. Is our job to lead them somehow to act in righteousness, though they haven’t evaluated it of their own accord? Is the inner monologue really a ongoing discussion of our souls with the Holy Spirit?

To be determined…

We have to break their word spells.

“Stop taking the high road with these intolerant people” = “become more intolerant of these intolerant people” = “accept that intolerance is a negative trait” = “hypocrisy increases”

Intolerance is good if it is of bad actions. Bigotry is good if it is of bad ideas. Hate is good if it is toward evil, per the Bible:

Amos 5:15 Hate evil, love good, And establish justice in the courts. It may be that the LORD, the God Tzva'ot, will be gracious to the remnant of Yosef."

Words become gibberish words in terms of connotation when you can’t be against them without being them. It’s a linguistic Chinese finger cuff trap to increase hypocrisy and confusion, which sow division.

How they keep their blinders on is THE question. I had a post a while back about how apparently some large portion of humanity doesn’t have an inner monologue, but I don’t think that’s THE root, just a branch of the corrupted tree. Is our job to lead them somehow to act in righteousness, though they haven’t evaluated it of their own accord?