It’s an interesting point. The problem is the Amendment does not contemplate a scenario where someone is denied the Office through election rigging.

If this was up to you and me we would say common sense says we must consider this as a case where President Trump is completing someone else’s term even though that term was held by fraudulent means. It’s doubtful SCOTUS could make that kind of call.

It’s an interesting point. The problem is the Amendment does not contemplate a scenario where someone is denied the Office through election rigging.

If this was up to you and I we would say common sense says we must consider this as a case where President Trump is completing someone else’s term even though that term was held by fraudulent means. It’s doubtful SCOTUS could make that kind of call.