AN interesting twist in his opinion, is that the prosecution of course cannot continue, till Congress makes the office by law, and the SC is appointed by law.

However, asserting that the Smith lacks the capacity to be SC, would also mean all his actions are done in a private capacity and, purporting to be an official or officer, which he is not. Smith is an imposter.

Merrick Garland overstepped his bounds. And thus it can be construed to be a conspiracy to deprive rights.

It remains an amazing fact to me none of these justices have come up with the idea to check 241/242?

Further more, IF it is held that Smith is an imposter, then all his acts are null and void, meaning no legal power is emanating from it. Which also means that the remanding to the court for the remainder of the INDICTMENT is failing as well and should be considered null and void.

And this leaves the SCOTUS with no question to remand.

AN interesting twist in his opinion, is that the prosecution of course cannot continue, till Congress makes the office by law, and the SC is appointed by law.

However, asserting that the Smith lacks the capacity to be SC, would also mean all his actions are done in a private capacity and, guilty of being an officer, which he is not. Smith is an imposter.

Merrick Garland overstepped his bounds. And thus it can be construed to be a conspiracy to deprive rights.

It remains an amazing fact to me none of these justices have come up with the idea to check 241/242?

Further more, IF it is held that Smith is an imposter, then all his acts are null and void, meaning no legal power is emanating from it. Which also means that the remanding to the court for the remainder of the INDICTMENT is failing as well and should be considered null and void.

And this leaves the SCOTUS with no question to remand.