So......

• Zero identifiable sauce (oooh, "French journalists")

• Dodgy looking invoice (does not indicate the currency, no address for client, supposedly French business document all presented in English)

• Perfectly tailored information to trigger people and confirm biases, eliciting massive sharing

• Ideal material (if groundless, as is likely) for MSM Propaganda machine to 'debunk' more and more REAL information surrounding Ukraine, corruption and the Swamp.

What's not to love? /s

I guess the only question is: why would this be stickied with such an obvious lack of verifiable foundation?

hmmmm....

IMO, the ONLY way such posts can be considered valid (and therefore worthy of stickying) is if the post itself raises the question: Is This Real? and directly inspires investigation and verification / debunking, INSTEAD of presenting something as fact with ZERO corroborating data and information.

Ring ring: Oxford Dictionary phoned and suggested we may wish to relabel GAW by redacting the "we are researchers" portion of our mission statement...

Note: want more data to sustain a 'fake' conclusion?

Run a google search and see how already, within 10 hours, the image and narrative have been shared across dozens of 'alt-media' websites and x accounts, but with NONE of them with ANY actual corroborating evidence, facts, or source.

So......

• Zero identifiable sauce (oooh, "French journalists")

• Dodgy looking invoice (does not indicate the currency, no address for client, supposedly French business document all presented in English)

• Perfectly tailored information to trigger people and confirm biases, eliciting massive sharing

• Ideal material (if groundless, as is likely) for MSM Propaganda machine to 'debunk' more and more REAL information surrounding Ukraine, corruption and the Swamp.

What's not to love?

I guess the only question is: why would this be stickied with such an obvious lack of verifiable foundation?

hmmmm....

IMO, the ONLY way such posts can be considered valid is if the post itself raises the question: is this real? and inspired investigation and verification or debunking, INSTEAD of presenting something as fact with ZERO corroborating data and information.

Ring ring: Oxford Dictionary phoned and suggested we may wish to relabel GAW by redacting the "we are researchers" portion of our mission statement...

So......

• Zero identifiable sauce (oooh, "French journalists")

• Dodgy looking invoice (does not indicate the currency, no address for client, supposedly French business document all presented in English)

• Perfectly tailored information to trigger people and confirm biases, eliciting massive sharing

• Ideal material if groundless for MSM Propaganda machine to 'debunk' more and more real information surrounding Ukraine, corruption and the Swamp.

What's not to love?

I guess the only question is: why would this be stickied with such an obvious lack of verifiable foundation?

hmmmm....

IMO, the ONLY way such posts can be considered valid is if the post itself raises the question: is this real? and inspired investigation and verification or debunking, INSTEAD of presenting something as fact with ZERO corroborating data and information.

Ring ring: Oxford Dictionary phoned and suggested we may wish to relabel GAW by redacting the "we are researchers" portion of our mission statement...

So......

• Zero identifiable sauce (oooh, "French journalists")

• Dodgy looking invoice (does not indicate the currency, no address for client, supposedly French business document all presented in English)

• Perfectly tailored information to trigger people and confirm biases, eliciting massive sharing

• Ideal material if groundless for MSM Propaganda machine to 'debunk' more and more real information surrounding Ukraine, corruption and the Swamp.

What's not to love?

I guess the only question is: why would this be stickied with such an obvious lack of verifiable foundation?

hmmmm....