Then how is that different from the non-white people who were born in the UK or who naturalized legally?

How can "Make the UK White Again!" happen with non-white people living there?

And if "Nations belong to their people", how far back does that go? Australia and New Zealand weren't mostly white until a couple of hundred years ago. For thousands of years before that, there were no white people there.

The same for the US and the native people there.

You asking the question calls your intelligence into question.

No, me asking these questions calls into question the little thought given to such proclamations. Or it points out sheer hypocrisy. One or the other.

Edited to add: I'll point out that in the case of Australia, New Zealand, and the US, genocide of the original people there is what lead to those countries being predominantly white, while what people here are protesting are foreigners simply coming to live in those countries and not them committing genocide.

Yet people don't seen to have a problem with how white people have come to be the predominant race in a country.

It's an odd set of ethics that can validate one, and denigrate the other.

Then how is that different from the non-white people who were born in the UK or who naturalized legally?

How can "Make the UK White Again!" happen with non-white people living there?

And if "Nations belong to their people", how far back does that go? Australia and New Zealand weren't mostly white until a couple of hundred years ago. For thousands of years before that, there were no white people there.

The same for the US and the native people there.

You asking the question calls your intelligence into question.

No, me asking these questions calls into question the little thought given to such proclamations. Or it points out sheer hypocrisy. One or the other.