It looks like we are saying the same thing to me. Interest and transaction fees are the profit taking of those additional loans.

Unless you’re looking past the sale and saying that the more loans that get written, the more loans that can’t be repaid, which means the more asset seizures.

England seems to have gone through similar events to the one we are in at least 2-3 times since William the Conqueror, which may have been one of them in itself - 1066, 1190, 1688, surely another one in the 1750-2000 range.

What if 1190 was an early step in gathering an opposition to force John to sign the Magna Carta in 1215 following all the attempted debt seizures? We don’t really cover it here much, but the Magna Carta was likely a huge step toward our own Constitution and more valid aspects of our legal framework.

It may also be good for us to map the feudal system overtop of the current corporate structures, as “holding companies” seem like a modern abstract form of a physical feudal castle. “Held in Fee”. Wal-Mart is similar to the Lincolnshire district. Who is the king and/or princes of that structure? Not the corporate board of the company, but who the board reports to.

It looks like we are saying the same thing to me. Interest and transaction fees are the profit taking of those additional loans.

Unless you’re looking past the sale and saying that the more loans that get written, the more loans that can’t be repaid, which means the more asset seizures.

England seems to have gone through similar events to the one we are in at least 2-3 times since William the Conqueror, which may have been one of them in itself - 1066, 1190, 1688, surely another one in the 1750-2000 range.

What if 1190 was an early step in gathering an opposition to force John to sign the Magna Carta in 1215 following all the attempted debt seizures? We don’t really cover it here much, but the Magna Carta was likely a huge step toward our own Constitution and more valid aspects of our legal framework.

It may also be good for us to map the feudal system overtop of the current corporate structures, as “holding companies” seem like a modern abstract form of a physical feudal castle. “Held in Fee”.

It looks like we are saying the same thing to me. Interest and transaction fees are the profit taking of those additional loans.

Unless you’re looking past the sale and saying that the more loans that get written, the more loans that can’t be repaid, which means the more asset seizures.

England seems to have gone through similar events to the one we are in at least 2-3 times since William the Conqueror, which may have been one of them in itself - 1066, 1190, 1688, surely another one in the 1750-2000 range.

What if 1190 was an early step in gathering an opposition to force John to sign the Magna Carta in 1215 following all the attempted debt seizures? We don’t really cover it here much, but the Magna Carta was likely a huge step toward our own Constitution and more valid aspects of our legal framework.

It looks like we are saying the same thing to me. Interest and transaction fees are the profit taking of those additional loans.

Unless you’re looking past the sale and saying that the more loans that get written, the more loans that can’t be repaid, which means the more asset seizures.

England seems to have gone through similar events to the one we are in at least 2-3 times since William the Conqueror, which may have been one of them in itself - 1066, 1190, 1688, surely another one in the 1750-2000 range.

What if 1190 was an early step in gathering an opposition to force John to sign the Magna Carta following all the attempted debt seizures? We don’t really cover it here much, but the Magna Carta was likely a huge step toward our own Constitution and more valid aspects of our legal framework.

It looks like we are saying the same thing to me. Interest and transaction fees are the profit taking of those additional loans.

Unless you’re looking past the sale and saying that the more loans that get written, the more loans that can’t be repaid, which means the more asset seizures.

England seems to have gone through similar events to the one we are in at least 2-3 times since William the Conqueror, which may have been one of them in itself - 1066, 1190, 1688, surely another one in the 1750-2000 range.

What if 1190 was an early step in gathering an opposition to force John to sign the Magna Carta following all the attempted debt seizures?

It looks like we are saying the same thing to me. Interest and transaction fees are the profit taking of those additional loans.

Unless you’re looking past the sale and saying that the more loans that get written, the more loans that can’t be repaid, which means the more asset seizures.

England seems to have gone through similar events to the one we are in at least 2-3 times since William the Conqueror, which may have been one of them in itself - 1066, 1190, 1688, surely another one in the 1750-2000 range.