Hmmmm. I don't feel like this really answers the question.
It seems to me that you are so convinced of your conclusions that you cannot imagine any other. Do you think that is or might be true?
Or is it because you think the majority consensus here agrees with you and therefore, if the people here are leading edge, this agreement reinforces your conclusions?
I'm not sure that this is a good thing.
Aristotle: "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it"
Fwiw, I don't think GAW is quite as leading edge as we here tend to think. It is a unique community, with many virtues indeed. But as one mod recently estimated, [the mod thinks] we have some 5k active contributors and maybe 10 or a hundred times more lurkers with or without accounts.
But already in 2018, the global Q community present on reddit was in the hundreds of thousands. It has grown and multiplied and permeated many areas of the global net, with Q aware people actively numbering in the millions.
GAW is great, certainly, but we are but small frogs in a gigantic pond, making our contributions and efforts as best we can. The quality is decent, but I'm not sure I think the majority here are leading edge. We're very small, and our analysis and research dimension are far less robust than our information sharing aspect, imo.
But that's just me, I guess. Maybe I'm a bit wary of our GAW frogs over-estimating our significance in the greater scheme of things. Hmmmm...
EDIT:
Case in point: Look at how so many of our frogs completely gobble up and react to this disinformation clickbait post. Checking? No. Researching? No. falling for fake news? So many.....
https://greatawakening.win/p/17te56OoOO/-lgbtq-leaders-sign-wef-treaty-t/c/
Sadly, such instances are not infrequent. Far too many and too low grade for my liking.
Hmmmm. I don't feel like this really answers the question.
It seems to me that you are so convinced of your conclusions that you cannot imagine any other. Do you think that is or might be true?
Or is it because you think the majority consensus here agrees with you and therefore, if the people here are leading edge, this agreement reinforces your conclusions?
I'm not sure that this is a good thing.
Aristotle: "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it"
Fwiw, I don't think GAW is quite as leading edge as we here tend to think. It is a unique community, with many virtues indeed. But as one mod recently estimated, [the mod thinks] we have some 5k active contributors and maybe 10 or a hundred times more lurkers with or without accounts.
But already in 2018, the global Q community present on reddit was in the hundreds of thousands. It has grown and multiplied and permeated many areas of the global net, with Q aware people actively numbering in the millions.
GAW is great, certainly, but we are but small frogs in a gigantic pond, making our contributions and efforts as best we can. The quality is decent, but I'm not sure I think the majority here are leading edge. We're very small, and our analysis and research dimension are far less robust than our information sharing aspect, imo.
But that's just me, I guess. Maybe I'm a bit wary of our GAW frogs over-estimating our significance in the greater scheme of things. Hmmmm...