It does take familiarity with firearms
I've been hunting since I was 13. Not to brag, but just for context, I can hit a (slow) moving turkey at the base of the neck from 100 yards with an open sight.
I will rate my marksmanship more highly than your movie appreciation
I wasn't talking about hollywood movies, I was talking about my comprehensive investigation into the past.
It doesn't affect my recollection of successful attempts against Lincoln
Lincoln was quite possibly faked. All of the others have different organizations behind them than history records. Both FDR and Reagan were almost certainly intended to not succeed but were either intended to create a "political victim" (FDR) or intended as a warning (Reagan).
You have to actually dig in to history to see the fuckery. There is so much more on every single one of those events that isn't recorded in the standard version of history, but that you can find in congressional reports, biographies, financial records, etc. that paint a very different picture than the one given to the masses.
Regardless, in none of those cases were any of them hit in a way that will be completely obvious to the whole world, yet actually completely harmless to the "victim." Those "coincidences" are, I suggest, anything but coincidental.
It does take familiarity with firearms
I've been hunting since I was 13. Not to brag, but just for context, I can hit a (slow) moving turkey at the base of the neck from 100 yards with an open sight.
I will rate my marksmanship more highly than your movie appreciation
I wasn't talking about hollywood movies, I was talking about my comprehensive investigation into the past.
It doesn't affect my recollection of successful attempts against Lincoln
Lincoln was quite possibly faked. All of the others have different organizations behind them than history records. Both FDR and Reagan were almost certainly intended to not succeed.
You have to actually dig in to history to see the fuckery. There is so much more on every single one of those events that isn't recorded in the standard version of history, but that you can find in congressional reports, biographies, financial records, etc. that paint a very different picture than the one given to the masses.
Regardless, in none of those cases were any of them hit in a way that will be completely obvious to the whole world, yet actually completely harmless to the "victim." Those "coincidences" are, I suggest, anything but coincidental.