Thanks for that. What I saw was a stereotypical liberal politician being confronted for his documented-by-video stance, just as u/BurnNewHistoryBooks stated (jail climate change deniers), and trying to talk circles around the direct questions of the host by spewing mealy-mouthed, virtue-signalling blather to attempt to make himself seem like he has some moral upper ground. When the third guy there (sorry, I don't know who these other two guys are, host and co-host?) made the analogy of how those with opposing viewpoints about the C19 hoax were shut down, censored, fired, etc, I think RFK realized he wasn't going to weasel out of of taking responsibility for his own words and went for option #2 - pretending that he wouldn't have said those words if he understood what he does now (this as it relates to 1A, censorship and, presumably, jailing those who disagree). Sorry, but - I'll say it again - he's a stereotypical leftist establishment politician. He seems like a nice guy, but his perspectives are warped.

Thanks for that. What I saw was a stereotypical liberal politician being confronted for his documented-by-video stance, just as u/BurnNewHistoryBooks stated (jail climate change deniers), and trying to talk circles around the direct questions of the host by spewing mealy-mouthed, virtue-signalling blather to make him seem like he has some moral upper ground. When the third guy there (sorry, I don't know who these other two guys are, host and co-host?) made the analogy of how those with opposing viewpoints about the C19 hoax were shut down, censored, fired, etc, I think RFK realized he wasn't going to weasel out of of taking responsibility for his own words and went for option #2 - pretending that he wouldn't have said those words if he understood what he does now (this as it relates to 1A, censorship and, presumably, jailing those who disagree). Sorry, but - I'll say it again - he's a stereotypical leftist establishment politician. He seems like a nice guy, but his perspectives are warped.