Begin 2/2

Regardless of what you would choose, I suggest there must be at least some granting that such a decision is not easy to apply with a Universal Morality. It is also important to realize that we are not the people making the moral decisions. We are the ones sitting in judgment. The answers of “what is moral” can change depending on your position. It's a lot easier to say “that's immoral” when you are not the only one with the opportunity to flip the switch.

Personally, I'd rather die, or lose loved ones (I've lost quite a few in the past three years), than continue to live in the world I've discovered by my investigation. I said “500 years” in my hypothetical, but I was underplaying what I've found in my investigation. It has at least been 2000 years, and before that humanity lived under a completely different subjugation, but that subjugation too was done by the same group of people, the same aristocracy, ruling the world from in front of the scenes, instead of behind it, for at least 5000 years before the latest Grand Illusion began about 2000 years ago.

Of course what I've laid out is crazy. And of course it doesn't apply to our world...

If you would like to see the beginnings of my report, you are welcome to read it here. It is only the beginning of the exposure of how closely our world aligns with the hypothetical I've proposed. With what is there now, it doesn't even come close to the exposure that is coming (or that I intend, if I can ever get back to finishing it up in earnest). What it is however, is a comprehensive and very detailed case that suggests (very strongly, albeit currently incompletely) that there exists a single corporation in the world, and a single body of people that run it, and that that has been the case for almost two centuries. If you are interested, it takes a few hours to read. I have been told by quite a few people it is the best exposure of it's kind ever produced. I toot my own horn, not because I want that type of feedback, but because I want to encourage people to read it. It is essential, I think, to make cases that can't be refuted, and I think that I have done so.

End 2/2

Begin 2/2

Regardless of what you would choose, I suggest there must be at least some granting that such a decision is not easy to apply with a Universal Morality. It is also important to realize that we are not the people making the moral decisions. We are the ones sitting in judgment. The answers of “what is moral” can change depending on your position. It's a lot easier to say “that's immoral” when you are not the only one with the opportunity to flip the switch.

Personally, I'd rather die, or lose loved ones (I've lost quite a few in the past three years), than continue to live in the world I've discovered by my investigation. I said “500 years” in my hypothetical, but I was underplaying what I've found in my investigation. It has *at least * been 2000 years, and before that humanity lived under a completely different subjugation, but that subjugation too was done by the same group of people, the same aristocracy, ruling the world from in front of the scenes, instead of behind it, for at least 5000 years before the latest Grand Illusion began about 2000 years ago.

Of course I've laid out is crazy. And of course it doesn't apply to our world...

If you would like to see the beginnings of my report, you are welcome to read it here. It is only the beginning of the exposure of how closely our world aligns with the hypothetical I've proposed. With what is there now, it doesn't even come close to the exposure that is coming (or that I intend, if I can ever get back to finishing it up in earnest). What it is however, is a comprehensive and very detailed case that suggests (very strongly, albeit currently incompletely) that there exists a single corporation in the world, and a single body of people that run it, and that that has been the case for almost two centuries. If you are interested, it takes a few hours to read. I have been told by quite a few people it is the best exposure of it's kind ever produced. I toot my own horn, not because I want that type of feedback, but because I want to encourage people to read it. It is essential, I think, to make cases that can't be refuted, and I think that I have done so.

End 2/2