"On The Jews And Their Lies" is a suspected forgery and nobody can find a 1st edition copy of it. It was written in an attempt to discredit Luther and the Protestant Reformation, imo.
"They're all in agreement that we need a one world government, the only thing they disagree on is who will rule it."
Freemasonic gnostic vs. the RCC...
🍿 is being consumed here. Please continue, I'm learning a lot!
Btw, here is a two-part documentary on the Freemasonic (&other secret societies) parallel infiltration of the USA during its founding. It's quite long but worth the watch if you guys ever have the time. TL:DR the secret societies infiltrated the USA from the start, begun underground networks and made advances in their plots to take it over slowly thoughout the following centuries, and are now so embedded that even these historical facts are almost inseparable from the true history about its founding.
America's Beginnings: https://youtu.be/tzKqVtu6C5s
Riddles In Stone: https://youtu.be/oaEKBBsncng
If the RCC was infiltrated it wasn't "cabal faction subverts Christ's church",
it was "cabal faction subverts cabal top dog faction in attempt to be top dog faction".
This is a topic that needs more attention and is quite complex if approached from the wrong starting points, of which there are myriads.
"On The Jews And Their Lies" is a suspected Jesuit forgery and nobody can find a 1st edition copy of it. It was written in an attempt to discredit Luther and the Protestant Reformation, imo.
It's inconsistent with Luther's writing style in its length, tone, and lack of theological depth. The book is much longer than most of Luther's other works, and it lacks the theological rigor and intellectual nuance that is characteristic of his writing.
Additionally, the language used in the book is much more caustic than is typical for Luther, who generally expressed his criticisms in a more restrained and measured manner.
While Luther's views on Judaism evolved over time and he continued to express criticism of the Jewish faith in later writings, the harsh and vitriolic language used in that book is not representative of his writing style. The writings he penned after featured the same ol' Luther--more restrained and measured in tone, with criticisms of Judaism being generally less abusive and more focused on theological issues. This stands in contrast to the extreme language and tone of "On the Jews and Their Lies", which leaves it as an anomaly rather than a permanent shift in his writing style.
/end speculation
"They're all in agreement that we need a one world government, the only thing they disagree on is who will rule it."
Freemasonic gnostic vs. the RCC...
🍿 is being consumed here. Please continue, I'm learning a lot!
Btw, here is a two-part documentary on the Freemasonic (&other secret societies) parallel infiltration of the USA during its founding. It's quite long but worth the watch if you guys ever have the time. TL:DR the secret societies infiltrated the USA from the start, begun underground networks and made advances in their plots to take it over slowly thoughout the following centuries, and are now so embedded that even these historical facts are almost inseparable from the true history about its founding.
America's Beginnings: https://youtu.be/tzKqVtu6C5s
Riddles In Stone: https://youtu.be/oaEKBBsncng
If the RCC was infiltrated it wasn't "cabal faction subverts Christ's church",
it was "cabal faction subverts cabal top dog faction in attempt to be top dog faction".
This is a topic that needs more attention and is quite complex if approached from the wrong starting points, of which there are myriads.
"On The Jews And Their Lies" is a suspected Jesuit forgery and nobody can find a 1st edition copy of it. It was written in an attempt to discredit Luther and the Protestant Reformation, imo.
It's inconsistent with Luther's writing style in its length, tone, and lack of theological depth. The book is much longer than most of Luther's other works, and it lacks the theological rigor and intellectual nuance that is characteristic of his writing.
Additionally, the language used in the book is much more caustic than is typical for Luther, who generally expressed his criticisms in a more restrained and measured manner.
While Luther's views on Judaism evolved over time and he continued to express criticism of the Jewish faith in later writings, the harsh and vitriolic language used in that book is not representative of his writing style. The writings he penned after featured the same ol' Luther--more restrained and measured in tone, with criticisms of Judaism being generally less abusive and more focused on theological issues. This stands in contrast to the extreme language and tone of "On the Jews and Their Lies", which leaves it as an anomaly rather than a permanent shift in his writing style.
"They're all in agreement that we need a one world government, the only thing they disagree on is who will rule it."
Freemasonic gnostic vs. the RCC...
🍿 is being consumed here. Please continue, I'm learning a lot!
Btw, here is a two-part documentary on the Freemasonic (&other secret societies) parallel infiltration of the USA during its founding. It's quite long but worth the watch if you guys ever have the time. TL:DR the secret societies infiltrated the USA from the start, begun underground networks and made advances in their plots to take it over slowly thoughout the following centuries, and are now so embedded that even these historical facts are almost inseparable from the true history about its founding.
America's Beginnings: https://youtu.be/tzKqVtu6C5s
Riddles In Stone: https://youtu.be/oaEKBBsncng
If the RCC was infiltrated it wasn't "cabal faction subverts Christ's church",
it was "cabal faction subverts cabal top dog faction in attempt to be top dog faction".
This is a topic that needs more attention and is quite complex if approached from the wrong starting points, of which there are myriads.
"On The Jews And Their Lies" is a suspected Jesuit forgery and nobody can find a 1st edition copy of it. It was written in an attempt to discredit Luther and the Protestant Reformation, imo.
It's inconsistent with Luther's writing style in its length, tone, and lack of theological depth. The book is much longer than most of Luther's other works, and it lacks the theological rigor and intellectual nuance that is characteristic of his writing.
Additionally, the language used in the book is much more caustic than is typical for Luther, who generally expressed his criticisms in a more restrained and measured manner.
While Luther's views on Judaism did evolve over time, and he continued to express criticism of the Jewish faith in his later writings, the harsh and vitriolic language used in that book is not representative of his writing style. The writings he penned after it came out featured the same ol' Luther; more restrained and measured in tone, with criticisms of Judaism being generally less abusive and more focused on theological issues. This stands in contrast to the extreme language and tone of "On the Jews and Their Lies", which leaves it as an anomaly rather than a permanent shift in his writing style.
"They're all in agreement that we need a one world government, the only thing they disagree on is who will rule it."
Freemasonic gnostic vs. the RCC...
🍿 is being consumed here. Please continue, I'm learning a lot!
Btw, here is a two-part documentary on the Freemasonic (&other secret societies) parallel infiltration of the USA during its founding. It's quite long but worth the watch if you guys ever have the time. TL:DR the secret societies infiltrated the USA from the start, begun underground networks and made advances in their plots to take it over slowly thoughout the following centuries, and are now so embedded that even these historical facts are almost inseparable from the true history about its founding.
America's Beginnings: https://youtu.be/tzKqVtu6C5s
Riddles In Stone: https://youtu.be/oaEKBBsncng
If the RCC was infiltrated it wasn't "cabal faction subverts Christ's church",
it was "cabal faction subverts cabal top dog faction in attempt to be top dog faction".
This is a topic that needs more attention and is quite complex if approached from the wrong starting points, of which there are myriads.