Perhaps you forget that we're in a den of absolute retards 😂

a bit of over-generalized sarcasm, but there's truth in it. The chans have the same problem but the difference there is that every post is in a single pipeline for every other anon to see in real-time, and so they can pile on the stupid and correct it before it gets out of hand. (doesn't always work but it's better than here)

The format of this site makes it a lot harder to correct a post before it takes off. I bet most people use the Community Style, which means they cannot downvote a post. Many may also feel hesitant to write a rebuke due to the frenly atmosphere and strict rules against "be respectful" etc.

Then there's the gray area of reporting clickbait, because some people feel strongly about a topic, account or website being legit. I personally want to start banning people for posting about "fake Joe Biden" because it does nothing to redpill people on anything of substance to the Q plan.

We also have our shills, and newfags too, or people who just come here and nowhere else so their perspective may be limited. (I strongly urge all anons here to lurk /qresearch/. It will boost your anon skills tremendously!)

The only way I find is to make a comment in the post rebuking it clearly, and keep doing that in every instance you see, hoping that it reaches a few frens each time and word will spread.

If there's a repeat offense of it you could make your own post countering the topic and just drop the link to it each time it's posted again.

I guess my point is that due to the format of this site you really have to be vigilant with this, and as you correct it, other anons will begin to see the truth and some will even join you in correcting it themselves so you don't have to do it all.

Out of curiosity I'm gonna go look for the post and see what people are saying. I know Pompeo is a hot topic of debate, just like Flynn. I also know there is much shilling in the anti-Flynn camp so perhaps it's the same with Pompeo. Either way though, the Plan is working fine no matter what people think of the players. It may even be somehow beneficial to the plan for us to be in disagreement over them.... dunno

Perhaps you forget that we're in a den of absolute retards 😂

a bit of over-generalized sarcasm, but there's truth in it. The chans have the same problem but the difference there is that every post is in a single pipeline for every other anon to see in real-time, and so they can pile on the stupid and correct it before it gets out of hand. (doesn't always work but it's better than here)

The format of this site makes it a lot harder to correct a post before it takes off. I bet most people use the Community Style, which means they cannot downvote a post. Many may also feel hesitant to write a rebuke due to the frenly atmosphere and strict rules against "be respectful" etc.

Then there's the gray area of reporting clickbait, because some people feel strongly about a topic, account or website being legit. I personally want to start banning people for posting about "fake Joe Biden" because it does nothing to redpill people on anything of substance to the Q plan.

We also have our shills, and newfags too, or people who just come here and nowhere else so their perspective may be limited. (I strongly urge all anons here to lurk /qresearch/)

The only way I find is to make a comment in the post rebuking it clearly, and keep doing that in every instance you see, hoping that it reaches a few frens each time and word will spread.

If there's a repeat offense of it you could make your own post countering the topic and just drop the link to it each time it's posted again.

I guess my point is that due to the format of this site you really have to be vigilant with this, and as you correct it, other anons will begin to see the truth and some will even join you in correcting it themselves so you don't have to do it all.

Out of curiosity I'm gonna go look for the post and see what people are saying. I know Pompeo is a hot topic of debate, just like Flynn. I also know there is much shilling in the anti-Flynn camp so perhaps it's the same with Pompeo. Either way though, the Plan is working fine no matter what people think of the players. It may even be somehow beneficial to the plan for us to be in disagreement over them.... dunno

Perhaps you forget that we're in a den of absolute retards 😂

a bit of over-generalized sarcasm, but there's truth in it. The chans have the same problem but the difference there is that every post is in a single pipeline for every other anon to see in real-time, and so they can pile on the stupid and correct it before it gets out of hand. (doesn't always work but it's better than here)

The format of this site makes it a lot harder to correct a post before it takes off. I bet most people use the Community Style, which means they cannot downvote a post. Many may also feel hesitant to write a rebuke due to the frenly atmosphere and strict rules against "be respectful" etc.

Then there's the gray area of reporting clickbait, because some people feel strongly about a topic, account or website being legit. I personally want to start banning people for posting about "fake Joe Biden" because it does nothing to redpill people on anything of substance to the Q plan.

We also have our shills, and newfags too, or people who just come here and nowhere else so their perspective may be limited.

The only way I find is to make a comment in the post rebuking it clearly, and keep doing that in every instance you see, hoping that it reaches a few frens each time and word will spread.

If there's a repeat offense of it you could make your own post countering the topic and just drop the link to it each time it's posted again.

I guess my point is that due to the format of this site you really have to be vigilant with this, and as you correct it, other anons will begin to see the truth and some will even join you in correcting it themselves so you don't have to do it all.

Out of curiosity I'm gonna go look for the post and see what people are saying. I know Pompeo is a hot topic of debate, just like Flynn. I also know there is much shilling in the anti-Flynn camp so perhaps it's the same with Pompeo. Either way though, the Plan is working fine no matter what people think of the players. It may even be somehow beneficial to the plan for us to be in disagreement over them.... dunno