Downdoots should have to make their case.

Truth is Truth. Statue of Liberty is one of the high places the Bible refers to.

The questions would be in how we approach anything. The Muslims, understandably, took a lot of global criticism for their actions on the Buddhas. I myself was unsupportive of it at the time. Yet many of those same people are currently celebrating men and women mutilating their genitals and dancing nude in public in front of children, … so there’s that, but … were those things allowed to happen because we’ve accepted idolatry to be in our midsts?

We should very seriously consider this and how these issues could be approached, and what the lines should be.

A lot of people would say “but I don’t worship the statue of liberty!”

Yes, nobody goes there and prostrates themselves and kisses its feet, BUT, if some country were to attack and destroy it, and only it, would many people not consider the destruction of a statute to be worthy of spilling blood? Is that not a declaration of reverence and worth-ship?

Would that not be spilling blood because a statue demanded it? Shouldn’t that be wrong? Which is greater, the stone or the life?

These are important questions. I don’t claim to have firm answers.

Downdoots should have to make their case.

Truth is Truth. Statue of Liberty is one of the high places the Bible refers to.

The questions would be in how we approach anything. The Muslims, understandably, took a lot of global criticism for their actions on the Buddhas. I myself was unsupportive of it at the time. Yet many of those same people are currently celebrating men and women mutilating their genitals and dancing nude in public in front of children, … so there’s that, but … were those things allowed to happen because we’ve accepted idolatry to be in our midsts?

We should very seriously consider this and how these issues could be approached, and what the lines should be.

A lot of people would say “but I don’t worship the statue of liberty!”

Yes, nobody goes there and prostrates themselves and kisses its feet, BUT, if some country were to attack and destroy it, and only it, would many people not consider the destruction of a statute to be worthy of spilling blood? Is that not a declaration of reverence and worth-ship?

Would that not be spilling blood because a statue demanded it? Shouldn’t that be wrong? Which is greater, the stone or the life?

These are important questions.

Downdoots should have to make their case.

Truth is truth.