It's strange to me that anon here don't see that we have been lied to about a lot of our history. Why would you not be open to this and think it worth digging into when you understand the Q operation?

I believe Jesus did reign and it was an extraordinary Millennium. Just because we can only see pale remnants of it doesn't mean it didn't happen does it? And we can see some incredible stuff left, but the masons have lied, set up a whole new history that doesn't hang together (once you start to analyze it from this point of view). I understand how upsetting this could be for devout Christians, but once you get over the initial meh, it becomes very exciting.

In regard to who actually bound Satan for 1000 years, I don't see anything saying it had to be the hand of the Lord himself. It wasn't Satan's final defeat. Check out Rev 20:7.

It's strange to me that anon here don't see that we have been lied to about a lot of our history. Why would you not be open to this and think it worth digging into when you understand the Q operation?

I believe Jesus did reign and it was an extraordinary Millennium. Just because we can only see pale remnants of it doesn't mean it didn't happen does it? And we can see some incredible stuff left, but the masons have lied, set up a whole new history that doesn't hang together once you start to analyze it from this point of view). I understand how upsetting this could be for devout Christians, but once you get over the initial meh, it becomes very exciting.

In regard to who actually bound Satan for 1000 years, I don't see anything saying it had to be the hand of the Lord himself. It wasn't Satan's final defeat. Check out Rev 20:7.