Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

"In reply to @Datasinc I clearly explained how the cops failed at their duties. Please read it and be better informed."

"mindlessly posting, we have higher standards, be better informed, do better" -

Why is it that responses to posts MUST CONTAIN VITRIOL? In your case, "polite" vitriol.


You know what? I did not read your post. I committed a great SIN.

So is everyone supposed to read all the posts before commenting? ESPECIALLY YOURS? Is that written in the handbook? Should people run their opinions by you before posting?

I saw the video, and used my discernment and INTUITION. Then I stated my opinion. Who are you to chastise me for that?

Get over yourself!

Discussions are meant to bring up different opinions, scenarios. Not just yours. I better check if my post doesn't support Drakeford's post! If everyone needs to check their posts with you before posting, this place would be dead.

Stick to the facts, ma'am.

114 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

"In reply to @Datasinc I clearly explained how the cops failed at their duties. Please read it and be better informed."

"mindlessly posting, we have higher standards, be better informed, do better" -

Why is it that responses to posts MUST CONTAIN VITRIOL? In your case, "polite" vitriol.


You know what? I did not read your post. I committed a great SIN.

So is everyone supposed to read all the posts before commenting? ESPECIALLY YOURS? Is that written in the handbook? Should people run their opinions by you before posting?

I saw the video, and used my discernment and INTUITION. Then I stated my opinion. Who are you to chastise me for that?

Get over yourself!

Discussions are meant to bring up different opinions, scenarios. Not just yours. I better check if my post doesn't support Drakeford's post! If everyone needs to check their posts with you before posting, this place would be dead.

Stick to the facts, ma'am.

114 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

"In reply to @Datasinc I clearly explained how the cops failed at their duties. Please read it and be better informed."

"mindlessly posting, we have higher standards, be better informed, do better" -

Why is it that responses to posts MUST CONTAIN VITRIOL? In your case, "polite", well-written vitriol.


You know what? I did not read your post. I committed a great SIN.

So is everyone supposed to read all the posts before commenting? ESPECIALLY YOURS? Is that written in the handbook? Should people run their opinions by you before posting?

I saw the video, and used my discernment and INTUITION. Then I stated my opinion. Who are you to chastise me for that?

Get over yourself!

Discussions are meant to bring up different opinions, scenarios. Not just yours. I better check if my post doesn't support Drakeford's post! If everyone needs to check their posts with you before posting, this place would be dead.

Stick to the facts, ma'am.

114 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

"In reply to @Datasinc I clearly explained how the cops failed at their duties. Please read it and be better informed."

"mindlessly posting, we have higher standards, be better informed, do better" -

Why is it that responses to posts MUST CONTAIN VITRIOL? In your case, "polite", well-written vitriol.


You know what? I did not read your post. I committed a great SIN.

So is everyone supposed to read all the posts before commenting? ESPECIALLY YOURS? Is that written in the handbook? Should people run their opinions by you before posting?

I saw the video, and used my discernment and INTUITION. Then I stated my opinion. Who are you to chastise me for that?

Get over yourself!

Discussions are meant to bring up different opinions, scenarios. Not just yours. I better check if my post doesn't support Drakeford's post! If everyone needs to check their posts with you before posting, this place would be dead.

Stick to the facts, ma'am.

114 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

"In reply to @Datasinc I clearly explained how the cops failed at their duties. Please read it and be better informed."

"mindlessly posting, we have higher standards, be better informed, do better" -

Why is it that responses to posts MUST CONTAIN VITRIOL? In your case, "polite", well-written vitriol.

You know what? I did not read your post. I committed a great SIN.

So is everyone supposed to read all the posts before commenting? ESPECIALLY YOURS? Should people run their opinions by you before posting?

I saw the video, and used my discernment and INTUITION. Then I stated my opinion. Who are you to chastise me for that?

Get over yourself!

Discussions are meant to bring up different opinions, scenarios. Not just yours. I better check if my post doesn't support Drakeford's post! If everyone needs to check their posts with you before posting, this place would be dead.

Stick to the facts, ma'am.

114 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

"In reply to @Datasinc I clearly explained how the cops failed at their duties. Please read it and be better informed."

"mindlessly posting, we have higher standards, be better informed, do better" -

Why is it that responses to posts MUST CONTAIN VITRIOL? In your case, "polite", well-written vitriol.

You know what? I did not read your post. I committed a great SIN.

So is everyone supposed to read all the posts before commenting? ESPECIALLY YOURS? Should people run their opinions by you before posting?

I saw the video, and used my discernment and INTUITION. Then I stated my opinion. Who are you to chastise me for that? Get over yourself!

Discussions are meant to bring up different opinions, scenarios. Not just yours. I better check if my post doesn't support Drakeford's post! If everyone needs to check their posts with you before posting, this place would be dead.

Stick to the facts, ma'am.

114 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

"mindlessly posting, we have higher standards, be better informed, do better" -

Why is it that responses to posts MUST CONTAIN VITRIOL? In your case, polite vitriol.

You know what? I did not read your post. I committed a great SIN.

So is everyone supposed to read all the posts before commenting? ESPECIALLY YOURS? Should people run their opinions by you before posting?

I saw the video, and used my discernment and INTUITION. Then I stated my opinion. Who are you to chastise me for that? Get over yourself!

Discussions are meant to bring up different opinions, scenarios. Not just yours. If everyone needs to check their posts with you before posting, this place would be dead.

Stick to the facts, ma'am.

114 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

You do have a point. But so do I. Discernment is needed for the best outcome.

"mindlessly posting, we have higher standards, do better" - Why is it that responses to posts MUST CONTAIN VITRIOL? Discussions are meant to bring up different opinions, scenarios. Not just yours.

Stick to the facts, ma'am.

114 days ago
1 score