Watching Tina Peters trial again today.

Link for reference and convenience:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17txRDIdpW/link-post--worldjusticenewscom-t/c/

Cameras and audio on at the start

Opened with a Dominion lawyer arguing that the Dominion guy subpoenaed by Tina's defense team should not have to testify because judge has already made several rulings in Dominion's favor and the guy feels threatened. Judge reminded that he thinks the defense teams arguments are crummy (👈 my word) because of failure to submit evidence applicable to the charges.

Defense responds that there is new evidence that is relative from the Dominion guy's other case in DC. Judge refuses to allow the ex parte (?) discussion where he reviews the Defense request on camera, so no camera or audio now.

Before the cameras were turned off, I thought I heard that the prosecution 's case was built on a lie with SoS & Dominion involved. Thus the judge ordered the cameras turned off.

Cameras on now but no audio. Judge and Defense lawyer are not in the courtroom at this moment.

Judge & Defense back in the room. Camera and audio back on. Judge says, "Defendants right to fair trial is not without limit. ". Ex parte and submitted motion contains points "not relevant" . Guy was not in attendance therefore "not relevant" . Judge: "So what?" regarding statement that Dominion launched this case against Tina. Leading, prejudicial... Therefore, Dominion guy subpoena quashed.

Questions by Defense of the last witness yesterday continues today. Camera and audio on.

Afternoon testimony is from Sandra Brown. Camera and audio on.

Interestingly, found this article today: “Dominion Voting LDF files Mesa County”: Former Mesa County Election Manager Accused of Election Fraud By Egbe Ogu | August 7, 2024

According to reports, Sandra Brown used her laptop to access the Dominion Election Management System a total of 111 times during the 2020 election. This access was unauthorized and raised red flags among election officials who later discovered that Brown had been using the system to flip votes in favor of a particular candidate.

LDF = Legal Defense Fund (?)

Correction! LDF =

LDF files, or Log Description Files, are used in the Dominion Voting System to track and record all actions taken within the system.

Watching Tina Peters trial again today.

Link for reference and convenience:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17txRDIdpW/link-post--worldjusticenewscom-t/c/

Cameras and audio on at the start

Opened with a Dominion lawyer arguing that the Dominion guy subpoenaed by Tina's defense team should not have to testify because judge has already made several rulings in Dominion's favor and the guy feels threatened. Judge reminded that he thinks the defense teams arguments are crummy (👈 my word) because of failure to submit evidence applicable to the charges.

Defense responds that there is new evidence that is relative from the Dominion guy's other case in DC. Judge refuses to allow the ex parte (?) discussion where he reviews the Defense request on camera, so no camera or audio now.

Before the cameras were turned off, I thought I heard that the prosecution 's case was built on a lie with SoS & Dominion involved. Thus the judge ordered the cameras turned off.

Cameras on now but no audio. Judge and Defense lawyer are not in the courtroom at this moment.

Judge & Defense back in the room. Camera and audio back on. Judge says, "Defendants right to fair trial is not without limit. ". Ex parte and submitted motion contains points "not relevant" . Guy was not in attendance therefore "not relevant" . Judge: "So what?" regarding statement that Dominion launched this case against Tina. Leading, prejudicial... Therefore, Dominion guy subpoena quashed.

Questions by Defense of the last witness yesterday continues today. Camera and audio on.

Afternoon testimony is from Sandra Brown. Camera and audio on.

Interestingly, found this article today: “Dominion Voting LDF files Mesa County”: Former Mesa County Election Manager Accused of Election Fraud By Egbe Ogu | August 7, 2024

According to reports, Sandra Brown used her laptop to access the Dominion Election Management System a total of 111 times during the 2020 election. This access was unauthorized and raised red flags among election officials who later discovered that Brown had been using the system to flip votes in favor of a particular candidate.

LDF = Legal Defense Fund (?)

Correction! LDF =

LDF files, or Log Description Files, are used in the Dominion Voting System to track and record all actions taken within the system.

Watching Tina Peters trial again today.

Link for reference and convenience:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17txRDIdpW/link-post--worldjusticenewscom-t/c/

Cameras and audio on at the start

Opened with a Dominion lawyer arguing that the Dominion guy subpoenaed by Tina's defense team should not have to testify because judge has already made several rulings in Dominion's favor and the guy feels threatened. Judge reminded that he thinks the defense teams arguments are crummy (👈 my word) because of failure to submit evidence applicable to the charges.

Defense responds that there is new evidence that is relative from the Dominion guy's other case in DC. Judge refuses to allow the ex parte (?) discussion where he reviews the Defense request on camera, so no camera or audio now.

Before the cameras were turned off, I thought I heard that the prosecution 's case was built on a lie with SoS & Dominion involved. Thus the judge ordered the cameras turned off.

Cameras on now but no audio. Judge and Defense lawyer are not in the courtroom at this moment.

Judge & Defense back in the room. Camera and audio back on. Judge says, "Defendants right to fair trial is not without limit. ". Ex parte and submitted motion contains points "not relevant" . Guy was not in attendance therefore "not relevant" . Judge: "So what?" regarding statement that Dominion launched this case against Tina. Leading, prejudicial... Therefore, Dominion guy subpoena quashed.

Questions by Defense of the last witness yesterday continues today. Camera and audio on.

Afternoon testimony is from Sandra Brown. Camera and audio on.

Interestingly, found this article today: “Dominion Voting LDF files Mesa County”: Former Mesa County Election Manager Accused of Election Fraud By Egbe Ogu | August 7, 2024

LDF = Legal Defense Fund (?)

Watching Tina Peters trial again today.

Link for reference and convenience:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17txRDIdpW/link-post--worldjusticenewscom-t/c/

Cameras and audio on at the start

Opened with a Dominion lawyer arguing that the Dominion guy subpoenaed by Tina's defense team should not have to testify because judge has already made several rulings in Dominion's favor and the guy feels threatened. Judge reminded that he thinks the defense teams arguments are crummy (👈 my word) because of failure to submit evidence applicable to the charges.

Defense responds that there is new evidence that is relative from the Dominion guy's other case in DC. Judge refuses to allow the ex parte (?) discussion where he reviews the Defense request on camera, so no camera or audio now.

Before the cameras were turned off, I thought I heard that the prosecution 's case was built on a lie with SoS & Dominion involved. Thus the judge ordered the cameras turned off.

Cameras on now but no audio. Judge and Defense lawyer are not in the courtroom at this moment.

Judge & Defense back in the room. Camera and audio back on. Judge says, "Defendants right to fair trial is not without limit. ". Ex parte and submitted motion contains points "not relevant" . Guy was not in attendance therefore "not relevant" . Judge: "So what?" regarding statement that Dominion launched this case against Tina. Leading, prejudicial... Therefore, Dominion guy subpoena quashed.

Questions by Defense of the last witness yesterday continues today. Camera and audio on.

--

Afternoon testimony is from Sandra Brown. Camera and audio on.

Interestingly, found this article today: “Dominion Voting LDF files Mesa County”: Former Mesa County Election Manager Accused of Election Fraud By Egbe Ogu | August 7, 2024

LDF = Legal Defense Fund (?)

Watching Tina Peters trial again today.

Link for reference and convenience:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17txRDIdpW/link-post--worldjusticenewscom-t/c/

Cameras and audio on at the start

Opened with a Dominion lawyer arguing that the Dominion guy subpoenaed by Tina's defense team should not have to testify because judge has already made several rulings in Dominion's favor and the guy feels threatened. Judge reminded that he thinks the defense teams arguments are crummy (👈 my word) because of failure to submit evidence applicable to the charges.

Defense responds that there is new evidence that is relative from the Dominion guy's other case in DC. Judge refuses to allow the ex parte (?) discussion where he reviews the Defense request on camera, so no camera or audio now.

Before the cameras were turned off, I thought I heard that the prosecution 's case was built on a lie with SoS & Dominion involved. Thus the judge ordered the cameras turned off.

Cameras on now but no audio. Judge and Defense lawyer are not in the courtroom at this moment.

Judge & Defense back in the room. Camera and audio back on. Judge says, "Defendants right to fair trial is not without limit. ". Ex parte and submitted motion contains points "not relevant" . Guy was not in attendance therefore "not relevant" . Judge: "So what?" regarding statement that Dominion launched this case against Tina. Leading, prejudicial... Therefore, Dominion guy subpoena quashed.

Questions by Defense of the last witness yesterday continues today. Camera and audio on.

Watching Tina Peters trial again today.

Link for reference and convenience:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17txRDIdpW/link-post--worldjusticenewscom-t/c/

Cameras and audio on at the start

Opened with a Dominion lawyer arguing that the Dominion guy subpoenaed by Tina's defense team should not have to testify because judge has already made several rulings in Dominion's favor and the guy feels threatened. Judge reminded that he thinks the defense teams arguments are crummy (👈 my word) because of failure to submit evidence applicable to the charges.

Defense responds that there is new evidence that is relative from the Dominion guy's other case in DC. Judge refuses to allow the ex parte (?) discussion where he reviews the Defense request on camera, so no camera or audio now.

Before the cameras were turned off, I thought I heard that the prosecution 's case was built on a lie with SoS & Dominion involved. Thus the judge ordered the cameras turned off.

Cameras on now but no audio. Judge and Defense lawyer are not in the courtroom at this moment.

Judge & Defense back in the room. Camera and audio back on. Judge says, "Defendants right to fair trial is not without limit. ". Ex parte and submitted motion contains points "not relevant" . Guy was not in attendance therefore "not relevant" . Judge: "So what?" regarding statement that Dominion launched this case against Tina. Leading, prejudicial... Therefore, Dominion guy subpoena quashed.

Watching Tina Peters trial again today.

Link for reference and convenience:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17txRDIdpW/link-post--worldjusticenewscom-t/c/

Cameras and audio on at the start

Opened with a Dominion lawyer arguing that the Dominion guy subpoenaed by Tina's defense team should not have to testify because judge has already made several rulings in Dominion's favor and the guy feels threatened. Judge reminded that he thinks the defense teams arguments are crummy (👈 my word) because of failure to submit evidence applicable to the charges.

Defense responds that there is new evidence that is relative from the Dominion guy's other case in DC. Judge refuses to allow the ex parte (?) discussion where he reviews the Defense request on camera, so no camera or audio now.

Before the cameras were turned off, I thought I heard that the prosecution 's case was built on a lie with SoS & Dominion involved. Thus the judge ordered the cameras turned off.

Cameras on now but no audio. Judge and Defense lawyer are not in the courtroom at this moment.

Judge & Defense back in the room. Camera and audio back on. Judge says, "Defendants right to fair trial is not without limit. ". Ex parte and submitted motion contains points "not relevant" . Guy was not in attendance therefore "not relevant" . Judge: "So what?" regarding statement that Dominion launched this case against Tina. Leading, prejudicial... Therefore, subpoena quashed.

Watching Tina Peters trial again today.

Link for reference and convenience:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17txRDIdpW/link-post--worldjusticenewscom-t/c/

Cameras and audio on at the start

Opened with a Dominion lawyer arguing that the Dominion guy subpoenaed by Tina's defense team should not have to testify because judge has already made several rulings in Dominion's favor and the guy feels threatened. Judge reminded that he thinks the defense teams arguments are crummy (👈 my word) because of failure to submit evidence applicable to the charges.

Defense responds that there is new evidence that is relative from the Dominion guy's other case in DC. Judge refuses to allow the ex parte (?) discussion where he reviews the Defense request on camera, so no camera or audio now.

Before the cameras were turned off, I thought I heard that the prosecution 's case was built on a lie with SoS & Dominion involved. Thus the judge ordered the cameras turned off.

Cameras on now but no audio. Judge and Defense lawyer are not in the courtroom at this moment.

Watching Tina Peters trial again today.

Link for reference and convenience:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17txRDIdpW/link-post--worldjusticenewscom-t/c/

Cameras and audio on at the start

Opened with a Dominion lawyer arguing that the Dominion guy subpoenaed by Tina's defense team should not have to testify because judge has already made several rulings in Dominion's favor and the guy feels threatened. Judge reminded that he thinks the defense teams arguments are crummy (👈 my word) because of failure to submit evidence applicable to the charges.

Defense responds that there is new evidence that is relative from the Dominion guy's other case in DC. Judge refuses to allow the ex parte (?) discussion where he reviews the Defense request on camera, so no camera or audio now.

Before the cameras were turned off, I thought I heard that the prosecution 's case was built on a lie with SoS & Dominion involved. Thus the judge ordered the cameras turned off.

Watching Tina Peters trial again today.

Link for reference and convenience:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17txRDIdpW/link-post--worldjusticenewscom-t/c/

Cameras and audio on at the start

Opened with a Dominion lawyer arguing that the Dominion guy subpoenaed by Tina's defense team should not have to testify because judge has already made several rulings in Dominion's favor and the guy feels threatened. Judge reminded that he thinks the defense teams arguments are crummy because of failure to submit evidence applicable to the charges.

Defense responds that there is new evidence that is relative from the Dominion guy's other case in DC. Judge refuses to allow the ex parte (?) discussion where he reviews the Defense request on camera, so no camera or audio now.

Before the cameras were turned off, I thought I heard that the prosecution 's case was built on a lie with SoS & Dominion involved. Thus the judge ordered the cameras turned off.

Watching Tina Peters trial again today.

Link for reference and convenience:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17txRDIdpW/link-post--worldjusticenewscom-t/c/

Cameras and audio on at the start

Opened with a Dominion lawyer arguing that the Dominion guy subpoenaed by Tina's defense team should not have to testify because judge has already made several rules in Dominion's favor and the guy feels threatened. Judge reminded that he thinks the defense teams arguments are crummy because of failure to submit evidence applicable to the charges.

Defense responds that there is new evidence that is relative from the Dominion guy's other case in DC. Judge refuses to allow the ex parte (?) discussion where he reviews the Defense request on camera, so no camera or audio now.

Before the cameras were turned off, I thought I heard that the prosecution 's case was built on a lie with SoS & Dominion involved. Thus the judge ordered the cameras turned off.

Watching Tina Peters trial again today.

Link for reference and convenience:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17txRDIdpW/link-post--worldjusticenewscom-t/c/

Cameras and audio on at the start

Opened with a Dominion lawyer arguing that the Dominion guy subpoenaed by Tina's defense team should not have to testify because judge has already made several rules in Dominion's favor and the guy feels threatened. Judge reminded that he thinks the defense teams arguments are crummy because of failure to submit evidence applicable to the charges.