I disagree with this, rather that Jesus was revealing the one and the same God's true nature, which was hidden to the double-minded and the compromised alike, hence why they were called "blind guides" when Jesus hit the scene. They had eyes but couldn't see, ears but couldn't hear.
Example: the Eye for an Eye doctrine was meant for the State to enact upon the people in a court of law. However, many took it to mean "if he stole from me, I'll do it back to him!"
God was in a war with satan and had to preserve some remnant of pure Israel seed to fulfill His promise of the Messiah, so that took priority over morality, seemingly. But the morals of God were still present, though cloaked behind a veil of strict judgement, and oftenly misunderstood.
Anyways, God tolerated this misunderstanding for a long time, yet Jesus came and revealed the rest of it. "...But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also." Matt. 5:39
"Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things." Rom. 2:1
I disagree with this, rather that Jesus was revealing the one and the same God's true nature, which was hidden to the double-minded and the compromised alike, hence why they were called "blind guides" when Jesus hit the scene. They had eyes but couldn't see, ears but couldn't hear.
Example: the Eye for an Eye doctrine was meant for the State to enact upon the people in a court of law. However, many took it to mean "if he stole from me, I'll do it back to him!"
God was in a war with satan and had to preserve some remnant of pure Israel seed to fulfill His promise of the Messiah, so that took priority over morality, seemingly. But the morals of God were still present, though cloaked behind a veil of strict judgement.
Anyways, God tolerated this misunderstanding for a long time, yet Jesus came and revealed the rest of it. "...But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also." Matt. 5:39
"Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things." Rom. 2:1
I disagree with this, rather that Jesus was revealing the one and the same God's true nature, which was hidden to the double-minded and the compromised alike, hence why they were called "blind guides" when Jesus hit the scene. They had eyes but couldn't see, ears but couldn't hear.
Example: the Eye for an Eye doctrine was meant for the State to enact upon the people in a court of law. However, many took it to mean "if he stole from me, I'll do it back to him!"
God was in a war with satan and had to preserve some remnant of pure Israel seed to fulfill the promise of the Messiah, so that took priority over morality, seemingly. But the morals of God were still present, though cloaked behind a veil of strict judgement.
Anyways, God tolerated this misunderstanding for a long time, yet Jesus came and revealed the rest of it. "...But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also." Matt. 5:39
"Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things." Rom. 2:1
I disagree with this, rather that Jesus was revealing the one and the same God's true nature, which was hidden to the double-minded and the compromised alike, hence why they were called "blind guides" when Jesus hit the scene. They had eyes but couldn't see, ears but couldn't hear.
Example: the Eye for an Eye doctrine was meant for the State to enact upon the people in a court of law. However, many took it to mean "if he stole from me, I'll do it back to him!"
God was in a war with satan and had to preserve some remnant of pure Israel seed to fulfill the promise of the Messiah, so that took priority over morality, seemingly.
God tolerated this for a time, yet Jesus came and revealed the rest of it. "...But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also." Matt. 5:39
"Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things." Rom. 2:1
I disagree with this, rather that Jesus was revealing the one and the same God's true nature, which was hidden to the double-minded and the compromised alike, hence why they were called "blind guides" when Jesus hit the scene. They had eyes but couldn't see, ears but couldn't hear.
Example: the Eye for an Eye doctrine was meant for the State to enact upon the people in a court of law. However, many took it to mean "if he stole from me, I'll do it back to him!"
God was in a war with satan and had to preserve some remnant of pure Israel seed to fulfill the promise of the Messiah, so that took priority over morality, seemingly.
God tolerated this for a time, yet Jesus came and revealed the rest of it. "Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things." Rom. 2:1
I disagree with this, rather that Jesus was revealing the one and the same God's true nature, which was hidden to the double-minded and the compromised alike, hence why they were called "blind guides" when Jesus hit the scene. They had eyes but couldn't see, ears but couldn't hear.
Example: the Eye for an Eye doctrine was meant for the State to enact upon the people in a court of law. However, many took it to mean "if he stole from me, I'll do it back to him!"
God was in a war with satan and had to preserve some remnant of pure Israel seed to fulfill the promise of the Messiah, so that took priority over morality, seemingly.
God tolerated this for a time, yet Jesus came and revealed the rest of it.
I disagree with this, rather that Jesus was revealing the one and the same God's true nature, which was hidden to the double-minded and the compromised alike, hence why they were called "blind guides" when Jesus hit the scene. They had eyes but couldn't see, ears but couldn't hear.
Example: the Eye for an Eye doctrine was meant for the State to enact upon the people in a court of law. However, many took it to mean "if he stole from me, I'll do it back to him!"
God tolerated this for a time, yet Jesus came and revealed the rest of it.
I disagree with this, rather that Jesus was revealing the one and the same God's true nature, which was hidden to the double-minded and the compromised alike, hence why they were called "blind guides" when Jesus hit the scene. They had eyes but couldn't see, ears but couldn't hear.