You hypothesize that I'm presenting a false dichotomy.

I hypothesize that I'm not.

The information necessary to distinguish who is correct or incorrect will never be public, so you have no more standing to claim it's a false dichotomy than I have to insist that it is a proper dichotomy.

But I'm not insisting. I'm merely presenting a hypothesis.

but I don't see any way to prove the issue one way or another

That's the way it is with everything that is Q-related. Nothing is provable. No one gets to insist any fact as indisputable. It's 100% about Socratic method, educated guesses and hypothesis.

The Socratic method in this particular instance ...

Does Q understand it is up against a centuries-entrenched cabal? Yes.

Does Q understand it is up against a cabal with trillions of dollars at its disposal? Yes.

Does Q understand that MK Ultra is a thing? Yes.

Does Q understand that assassination attempts against Trump would be inevitable? Yes.

Does Q understand the sheer magnitude of resources at the cabal's disposal virtually guarantee that Trump would be assassinated if his security wasn't overseen by military intelligence at all times? Yes.

With all that is at stake, would Q trust Trump's safety strictly to a hostile Biden administration? No.

Taking everything above into consideration, would Q allow the scenario unfold as we were explained? The one where

• shooter was filmed by many members of the public, many of whom directly reported to police/security
• shooter was known to be an issue by SS/police for over 20 minutes prior to shooting
• SS allowed Trump on stage even when the situation of the shooter was known

The answer to that is "No".

It's not even about whether they can "control every damn thing everywhere". It's about the sheer magnitude of the lapse in security that was reported. The lapse as reported could not exist if Q is real.

My hypothesis is that Trump and Q have already won the battle before it started by nailing the top of the cabal from the beginning, hijacking their chain of command, taking control of their operations and working out how the tens of thousands of cabal middlemen operatives will be punished while commanding them to self-immolate.

It is impossible to claim this hypothesis is false with publicly available knowledge. It's also impossible to insist that it's true. I'm not trying to insist that its true, I'm presenting it as a plausible hypothesis of the situation, and with all the data I see available I consider it to be the most plausible scenario.

You hypothesize that I'm presenting a false dichotomy.

I hypothesize that I'm not.

The information necessary to distinguish who is correct or incorrect will never be public, so you have no more standing to claim it's a false dichotomy than I have to insist that it is a proper dichotomy.

But I'm not insisting. I'm merely presenting a hypothesis.

but I don't see any way to prove the issue one way or another

That's the way it is with everything that is Q-related. Nothing is provable. No one gets to insist any fact as indisputable. It's 100% about Socratic method, educated guesses and hypothesis.

The Socratic method in this particular instance ...

Does Q understand it is up against a centuries-entrenched cabal? Yes.

Does Q understand it is up against a cabal with trillions of dollars at its disposal? Yes.

Does Q understand that MK Ultra is a thing? Yes.

Does Q understand that assassination attempts against Trump would be inevitable? Yes.

Does Q understand the sheer magnitude of resources at the cabal's disposal virtually guarantee that Trump would be assassinated if his security wasn't overseen by military intelligence at all times? Yes.

With all that is at stake, would Q trust Trump's safety strictly to a hostile Biden administration? No.

Taking everything above into consideration, would Q allow the scenario unfold as we were explained? The one where

• shooter was filmed by many members of the public, many of whom directly reported to police/security
• shooter was known to be an issue by SS/police for over 20 minutes prior to shooting
• SS allowed Trump on stage even when the situation of the shooter was known

The answer to that is "No".

It's not even about whether they can "control every damn thing everywhere". It's about the sheer magnitude of the lapse in security that was reported. The lapse as reported could not exist if Q is real.

My hypothesis is that Trump and Q have already won the battle before it started by nailing the top of the cabal from the beginning, hijacking their chain of command, taking control of their operations and working out how the tens of thousands of cabal middlemen operatives will be punished while commanding them to self-immolate. It is impossible to claim this hypothesis is false with publicly available knowledge.

You hypothesize that I'm presenting a false dichotomy.

I hypothesize that I'm not.

The information necessary to distinguish who is correct or incorrect will never be public, so you have no more standing to claim it's a false dichotomy than I have to insist that it is a proper dichotomy.

but I don't see any way to prove the issue one way or another

That's the way it is with everything that is Q-related. Nothing is provable. No one gets to insist any fact as indisputable. It's 100% about Socratic method, educated guesses and hypothesis.

The Socratic method in this particular instance ...

Does Q understand it is up against a centuries-entrenched cabal? Yes.

Does Q understand it is up against a cabal with trillions of dollars at its disposal? Yes.

Does Q understand that MK Ultra is a thing? Yes.

Does Q understand that assassination attempts against Trump would be inevitable? Yes.

Does Q understand the sheer magnitude of resources at the cabal's disposal virtually guarantee that Trump would be assassinated if his security wasn't overseen by military intelligence at all times? Yes.

With all that is at stake, would Q trust Trump's safety strictly to a hostile Biden administration? No.

Taking everything above into consideration, would Q allow the scenario unfold as we were explained? The one where

• shooter was filmed by many members of the public, many of whom directly reported to police/security
• shooter was known to be an issue by SS/police for over 20 minutes prior to shooting
• SS allowed Trump on stage even when the situation of the shooter was known

The answer to that is "No".

It's not even about whether they can "control every damn thing everywhere". It's about the sheer magnitude of the lapse in security that was reported. The lapse as reported could not exist if Q is real.

My hypothesis is that Trump and Q have already won the battle before it started by nailing the top of the cabal from the beginning, hijacking their chain of command, taking control of their operations and working out how the tens of thousands of cabal middlemen operatives will be punished while commanding them to self-immolate. It is impossible to claim this hypothesis is false with publicly available knowledge.

You hypothesize that I'm presenting a false dichotomy.

I hypothesize that I'm not.

The information necessary to distinguish who is correct or incorrect will never be public, so you have no more standing to claim it's a false dichotomy than I have to insist that it is.

but I don't see any way to prove the issue one way or another

That's the way it is with everything that is Q-related. Nothing is provable. No one gets to insist any fact as indisputable. It's 100% about Socratic method, educated guesses and hypothesis.

The Socratic method in this particular instance ...

Does Q understand it is up against a centuries-entrenched cabal? Yes.

Does Q understand it is up against a cabal with trillions of dollars at its disposal? Yes.

Does Q understand that MK Ultra is a thing? Yes.

Does Q understand that assassination attempts against Trump would be inevitable? Yes.

Does Q understand the sheer magnitude of resources at the cabal's disposal virtually guarantee that Trump would be assassinated if his security wasn't overseen by military intelligence at all times? Yes.

With all that is at stake, would Q trust Trump's safety strictly to a hostile Biden administration? No.

Taking everything above into consideration, would Q allow the scenario unfold as we were explained? The one where

• shooter was filmed by many members of the public, many of whom directly reported to police/security
• shooter was known to be an issue by SS/police for over 20 minutes prior to shooting
• SS allowed Trump on stage even when the situation of the shooter was known

The answer to that is "No".

It's not even about whether they can "control every damn thing everywhere". It's about the sheer magnitude of the lapse in security that was reported. The lapse as reported could not exist if Q is real.

My hypothesis is that Trump and Q have already won the battle before it started by nailing the top of the cabal from the beginning, hijacking their chain of command, taking control of their operations and working out how the tens of thousands of cabal middlemen operatives will be punished while commanding them to self-immolate. It is impossible to claim this hypothesis is false with publicly available knowledge.

You hypothesize that I'm presenting a false dichotomy.

I hypothesize that I'm not.

The information necessary to distinguish who is correct or incorrect will never be public, so you have no more standing to claim it's a false dichotomy than I have to insist that it is.

but I don't see any way to prove the issue one way or another

That's the way it is with everything that is Q-related. Nothing is provable. No one gets to insist any fact as indisputable. It's 100% about Socratic method, educated guesses and hypothesis.

The Socratic method in this particular instance ...

Does Q understand it is up against a centuries-entrenched cabal? Yes.

Does Q understand it is up against a cabal with trillions of dollars at its disposal? Yes.

Does Q understand that MK Ultra is a thing? Yes.

Does Q understand that assassination attempts against Trump would be inevitable? Yes.

Does Q understand the sheer magnitude of resources at the cabal's disposal virtually guarantee that Trump would be assassinated if his security wasn't overseen by military intelligence at all times? Yes.

With all that is at stake, would Q trust Trump's safety strictly to a hostile Biden administration? No.

Taking everything above into consideration, would Q allow the scenario unfold as we were explained? The one where

• shooter was filmed by many members of the public, many of whom directly reported to police/security
• shooter was known to be an issue by SS/police for over 20 minutes prior to shooting
• SS allowed Trump on stage even when the situation of the shooter was known

The answer to that is "No".

It's not even about whether they can "control every damn thing everywhere". It's about the sheer magnitude of the lapse in security that was reported. The lapse as reported could not exist if Q is real.