Google is Qtip, Tylenol, Coke, etc

Any "legal" action is pointless because "googling" something is here to stay

The normie expects a degree of convenience and fluid design language in a search product. What the consumer wants can not exist without the same inherent issues.

Bing, Yahoo, DDG, Brave...All clunky, poorly designed products. Breaking Google up will not make those products better. Just like breaking Microsoft up did not make Linux mainstream. Why? Average end user is not going to settle for 80% compatibility via proton/wine or not being able to use their Office suite key they are still using a decade later

And from an anon perspective? I can coerce and force Google to give me a better search result than DDG or Brave. "Google fu" is very real. Just like my steam/epic games work offline and all third party drm is stripped. If you know what you are doing, the software works for you not the otherway around

Google is Qtip, Tylenol, Coke, etc

Any "legal" action is pointless because "googling" something is here to stay

The normie expects a degree of convenience and fluid design language in a search product. What the consumer wants can not exist without the same inherent issues.

Bing, Yahoo, DDG, Brave...All clunky, poorly designed products. Breaking Google up will not make those products better. Just like breaking Microsoft up did not make Linux mainstream. Why? Average end user is not going to settle for 80% compatibility via proton/wine or not being able to use their Office suite key they are still using a decade later

And from an anon perspective? I can coerce and force Google to give me a better search result than DDG or Brave. "Google fu" is very real. Just like my steam/epic games work offline and all third party drm is stripped. If you know ehat you are doing, the software works for you not the otherway around

Google is Qtip, Tylenol, Coke, etc

Any "legal" action is pointless because "googling" something is here to stay

The normie expects a degree of convenience and fluid design language in a search product. What the consumer wants can not exist without the same inherent issues.

Bing, Yahoo, DDG, Brave...All clunky, poorly designed products. Breaking Google up will not make those products better. Just like breaking Microsoft up did not make Linux mainstream. Why? Average end user is not going to settle for 80% compatibility via proton/wine or not being able to use their Office suite key they are still using a decade later

And from an anon perspective? I can coerce and force Google to give me a better search result than DDG or Brave. "Google fu" is very real. Just like my steam/gog games work offline and all third party drm is stripped. If you knoe ehat you are doing, the software works for you not the otherway around

Google is Qtip, Tylenol, Coke, etc

Any "legal" action is pointless because "googling" something is here to stay

The normie expects a degree of convenience and fluid design language in a search product. What the consumer wants can not exist without the same inherent issues.

Bing, Yahoo, DDG, Brave...All clunky, poorly designed products. Breaking Google up will not make those products better. Just like breaking Microsoft up did not make Linux mainstream. Why? Average end user is not going to settle for 80% compatibility via proton/wine or not being able to use their Office suite key they are still using a decade later