If I hear you correctly, are you saying I have standing under Federal court to make that pseudo judge personally liable for $146 actual and $9600 in punitive damages?
Yes. This appears to be lawfully and Constitutionally correct if you can get a Federal Judge and sheriff to actually enforce the LAW. Problem is that all Obama-appointed Federal judges have no oaths so they cannot be charged with treason, intentionally, only fraud. They are intentionally violating the Constitution and not enforcing the LAW, but do not wish to be executed for treason.
State courts are all corporate courts and you may have waived Const rights via “user agreement” with DMV corporation when you registered which is also unconstitutional. Fed courts are still reluctant to intervene within states and enforce sovereign authority. 7-1-24 stripping of immunity for “unofficial acts” of Executive Branch (Article II) flows down to local city corps. City corp and county corp owned by state corp domiciled in DC. State corps owned by US Treasury which is under Executive Branch.
“Unofficial act” is any act that is based on a nonlaw or is unconstitutional. On 6-28-24 Chevron doctrine strikedown made ~95% of all Federal rules and regulations unlawful as well as all “admin courts” unlawful per violation of sep of powers (reinforced on 6-27-24 Jarkesy ruling, see W. Virginia v EPA 2022?). Federal courts are still formerly defining “official acts” vs “unofficial acts” due to newness of ruling, but likely to be “all things not laws” are “unofficial”.
You could sue ProSe ($405 filing fee) and argue that the court is “administrative Article II court” that is unlawful and judge has no immunity per 7-1 SCOTUS. If you hire a lawyer it likely will cost $10k and looks 50/50 unless you issue “30 day notice of liabilty” via certified mail to judge demanding refund and stripping judge of “intent defense”.
If I hear you correctly, are you saying I have standing under Federal court to make that pseudo judge personally liable for $146 actual and $9600 in punitive damages?
Yes. This appears to be lawfully and Constitutionally correct if you can get a Federal Judge and sheriff to actually enforce the LAW. Problem is that all Obama-appointed Federal judges have no oaths so they cannot be charged with treason, intentionally, only fraud. They are intentionally violating the Constitution and not enforcing the LAW, but do not wish to be executed for treason.
State courts are all corporate courts and you may have waived Const rights via “user agreement” with DMV corporation when you registered which is also unconstitutional. Fed courts are still reluctant to intervene within states and enforce sovereign authority. 7-1-24 stripping of immunity for “unofficial acts” of Executive Branch (Article II) flows down to local city corps. City corp and county corp owned by state corp domiciled in DC. State corps owned by US Treasury which is under Executive Branch.
“Unofficial act” is any act that is based on a nonlaw or is unconstitutional. On 6-28-24 Chevron doctrine strikedown made ~95% of all Federal rules and regulations unlawful as well as all “admin courts” unlawful per violation of sep of powers (reinforced on 6-27-24 Jarkesy ruling, see W. Virginia v EPA 2022?). Federal courts are still formerly defining “official acts” vs “unofficial acts” due to newness of ruling, but likely to be “all things not laws” are “unofficial”.
You could sue ProSe ($405 filing fee) and argue that the court is “administrative Article II court” that is unlawful and judge has no immunity per 7-1 SCOTUS. If you hire a lawyer it likely will cost $10k and looks 50/50 unless you issue “30 day notice of liabilty” to judge demanding refund and stripping judge of “intent defense”.
If I hear you correctly, are you saying I have standing under Federal court to make that pseudo judge personally liable for $146 actual and $9600 in punitive damages?
Yes. This appears to be lawfully and Constitutionally correct if you can get a Federal Judge and sheriff to actually enforce the LAW. Problem is that all Obama-appointed Federal judges have no oaths so they cannot be charged with treason, intentionally, only fraud. They are intentionally violating the Constitution and not enforcing the LAW, but do not wish to be executed for treason.
State courts are all corporate courts and you may have waived Const rights via “user agreement” with DMV corporation when you registered which is also unconstitutional. Fed courts are still reluctant to intervene within states and enforce sovereign authority. 7-1-24 stripping of immunity for “unofficial acts” of Executive Branch (Article II) flows down to local city corps. City corp and county corp owned by state corp domiciled in DC. State corps owned by US Treasury which is under Executive Branch.
“Unofficial act” is any act that is based on a nonlaw or is unconstitutional. On 6-28-24 Chevron doctrine strikedown made ~95% of all Federal rules and regulations unlawful as well as all “admin courts” unlawful per violation of sep of powers (reinforced on 6-27-24 Jarkesy ruling, see W. Virginia v EPA 2022?). Federal courts are still formerly defining “official acts” vs “unofficial acts” due to newness of ruling, but likely to be “all things not laws” are “unofficial”.
You could sue ProSe ($405 filing fee) and argue that the court is “administrative Article II court” that is unlawful and judge has no immunity per 7-1 SCOTUS. If you hire a lawyer it likely will cost $10k and looks 50/50 unless you issue “30 notice of liabilty” to judge demanding refund and stripping judge of “intent defense”.
If I hear you correctly, are you saying I have standing under Federal court to make that pseudo judge personally liable for $146 actual and $9600 in punitive damages?
Yes. This appears to be lawfully and Constitutionally correct if you can get a Federal Judge and sheriff to actually enforce the LAW. Problem is that all Obama-appointed Federal judges have no oaths so they cannot be charged with treason, intentionally, only fraud. They are intentionally violating the Constitution and not enforcing the LAW.
State courts are all corporate courts and you may have waived Const rights via “user agreement” with DMV corporation when you registered which is also unconstitutional. Fed courts are still reluctant to intervene within states and enforce sovereign authority. 7-1-24 stripping of immunity for “unofficial acts” of Executive Branch (Article II) flows down to local city corps. City corp and county corp owned by state corp domiciled in DC. State corps owned by US Treasury which is under Executive Branch.
“Unofficial act” is any act that is based on a nonlaw or is unconstitutional. On 6-28-24 Chevron doctrine strikedown made ~95% of all Federal rules and regulations unlawful as well as all “admin courts” unlawful per violation of sep of powers (reinforced on 6-27-24 Jarkesy ruling, see W. Virginia v EPA 2022?). Federal courts are still formerly defining “official acts” vs “unofficial acts” due to newness of ruling, but likely to be “all things not laws” are “unofficial”.
You could sue ProSe ($405 filing fee) and argue that the court is “administrative Article II court” that is unlawful and judge has no immunity per 7-1 SCOTUS. If you hire a lawyer it likely will cost $10k and looks 50/50 unless you issue “30 notice of liabilty” to judge demanding refund and stripping judge of “intent defense”.
If I hear you correctly, are you saying I have standing under Federal court to make that pseudo judge personally liable for $146 actual and $9600 in punitive damages?
Yes. This appears to be lawfully and Constitutionally correct if you can get a Federal Judge and sheriff to actually enforce the LAW. Problem is that all Obama-appointed Federal judges have no oaths so they cannot be charged with treason, intentionally, only fraud. They are intentionally violating the Constitution and not enforcing the LAW.
State courts are all corporate courts and you may have waived Const rights via “user agreement” with DMV corporation when you registered which is also unconstitutional. Fed courts are still reluctant to intervene within states and enforce sovereign authority. 7-1-24 stripping of immunity for “unofficial acts” of Executive Branch (Article II) flows down to local city corps. City corp and county corp owned by state corp domiciled in DC. State corps owned by US Treasury which is under Executive Branch.
“Unofficial act” is any act that is based on a nonlaw or is unconstitutional. On 6-28-24 Chevron doctrine strikedown made ~95% of all Federal rules and regulations unlawful as well as all “admin courts” unlawful per violation of sep of powers (reinforced on 6-27-24 Jarkesy ruling, see W. Virginia v EPA 2022?).
You could sue ProSe ($405 filing fee) and argue that the court is “administrative Article II court” that is unlawful and judge has no immunity per 7-1 SCOTUS. If you hire a lawyer it likely will cost $10k and looks 50/50 unless you issue “30 notice of liabilty” to judge demanding refund and stripping judge of “intent defense”.
If I hear you correctly, are you saying I have standing under Federal court to make that pseudo judge personally liable for $146 actual and $9600 in punitive damages?
Yes. This appears to be lawfully and Constitutionally correct if you can get a Federal Judge and sheriff to actually enforce the LAW. Problem is that all Obama-appointed Federal judges have no oaths so they cannot be charged with treason, intentionally, only fraud. They are intentionally violating the Constitution and not enforcing the LAW.
State courts are all corporate courts and you may have waived Const rights via “user agreement” with DMV corporation when you registered which is also unconstitutional. Fed courts are still reluctant to intervene within states and enforce sovereign authority. 7-1-24 stripping of immunity for “unofficial acts” of Executive Branch (Article II) flows down to local city corps. City corp and county corp owned by state corp domiciled in DC. State corps owned by US Treasury which is under Executive Branch.
“Unofficial act” is any act that is based on a nonlaw or is unconstitutional. On 6-28-24 Chevron doctrine strikedown made ~95% of all Federal rules and regulations unlawful as well as all “admin courts” unlawful per violation of sep of powers (reinforced on 6-27-24 ruling, see W. Virginia v EPA 2022?).
You could sue ProSe ($505 filing fee) and argue that the court is “administrative Article II court” that is unlawful and judge has no immunity per 7-1 SCOTUS. If you hire a lawyer it likely will cost $10k and looks 50/50 unless you issue “30 notice of liabilty” to judge demanding refund and stripping judge of “intent defense”.