I’ve been calling it witchcraft, but yes functionally we’re referring to the same concept.

Linguistic programming probably comes over much more palatably to listening audiences, too.

I may switch the term I use, didn’t know a better one.

Hilariously, the idea that referring to the concept/function of “linguistic programming” as “witchcraft” indicates irrationality in the person calling the thing “witchcraft”, is in and of itself, “linguistic programming”.

Stupid friggin’ Babble-on.

I’ve been calling it witchcraft, but yes functionally we’re referring to the same concept.

Linguistic programming probably comes over much more palatably to listening audiences, too.

I may switch the term I use, didn’t know a better one.

Hilariously, the idea that referring to the concept/function of “linguistic programming” as “witchcraft” indicates irrationality in the person calling the thing “witchcraft”, is in and of itself, “linguistic programming”.

I’ve been calling it witchcraft, but yes functionally we’re referring to the same concept.

Linguistic programming probably comes over much more palatably to listening audiences, too.

I may switch the term I use, didn’t know a better one.

Hilariously, the idea that referring to the function of “linguistic programming” as “witchcraft” indicates irrationality in the person calling the thing “witchcraft”, is in and of itself, “linguistic programming”.

I’ve been calling it witchcraft, but yes functionally we’re referring to the same concept.

Linguistic programming probably comes over much more palatably to listening audiences, too.

I may switch the term I use, didn’t know a better one.