I didn't think any of revelation is speaking in literal terms as it is presented in modern translation. Most of the Bible is not written from a literal perspective, but from a multidimensional one. I may get a bit of ignorant backlash from this, but the real discovery of the Bible is reading beyond the translation and understanding this. The history of it is actual, but it's not in the way we currently interpret it in a general sense. We have to remember it's been translated a lot, and certain phrases and documentations of events are a bit distorted from it's original transcription, because for a time, there was no universal calendar system like the Gregorian we currently use. So even our own interpretation of current time space would be quite different than when the Bible was written. We do not exist on the same dimensional plane as when it was written either; we have shifted since.

This is why I study the Geneva, NASB, NET and the apocrypha, but I also read slowly as to understand the actual choosing of language produced in the verses. I am mainly looking at the historical context, and validating/cross referencing between many different texts to get deeper insight, to help me understand God's motive with humankind and his mission to enable us to be more like Him.

So to your question, I currently interpret it as those who participate in ritual sacrifice and worship dark entities like Baphomet, that they will become afflicted by the very blood they consume and ignite, possibly enduring a sort of genetic atrophy. That makes sense in a literal context too as well as a metaphysical one. The mark of the beast is the blood pact, the intentional death of the soul, the striking out of salvation (mark, as in, crossing out) by entering this cabal. It's something that takes place on a spiritual level., but is more readily understood by physical actions taken to enter this blood pact, which may actually involve some sort of inoculation. There is even more to be discussed about the verse you provided, but that's going down a huge path of connecting several other verses in the Bible.

I guess it loops back into why Q says "Protect your DNA". It may actually mean, don't partake in whatever the cabal is about to convince you of because that is their ultimate goal; rob you of your salvation, and your spiritual link to God, which the mind, body and soul draws it's power from. And Revelation gives you that dire warning of what happens if you do. And for the sake of being candid, I don't believe God is saying to be anti vaccine; he's saying don't give in to things you are taught not to trust. Taking a vaccine won't stop your salvation, try as they might, but it may not be in your best interest. We are saved by allowing Jesus Christ into our hearts, to LOVE, the most powerful thing a human can do, believing that God is merciful upon us, and that we accept that we were born into a corrupt world, and will have to spend our entire lives fighting off dark forces. It's OUR pact with God that far transcends anything the cabal would ever dream of having.

I didn't think any of revelation is speaking in literal terms as it is presented in modern translation. Most of the Bible is not written from a literal perspective, but from a multidimensional one. I may get a bit of ignorant backlash from this, but the real discovery of the Bible is reading beyond the translation and understanding this. The history of it is actual, but it's not in the way we currently interpret it in a general sense. We have to remember it's been translated a lot, and certain phrases and documentations of events are a bit distorted from it's original transcription, because for a time, there was no universal calendar system like the Gregorian we currently use. So even our own interpretation of current time space would be quite different than when the Bible was written. We do not exist on the same dimensional plane as when it was written either; we have shifted since.

This is why I study the Geneva, NASB, NET and the apocrypha, but I also read slowly as to understand the actual choosing of language produced in the verses. I am mainly looking at the historical context, and validating/cross referencing between many different texts to get deeper insight, to help me understand God's motive with humankind and his mission to enable us to be more like Him.

So to your question, I currently interpret it as those who participate in ritual sacrifice and worship dark entities like Baphomet, that they will become afflicted by the very blood they consume and ignite, possibly enduring a sort of genetic atrophy. That makes sense in a literal context too as well as a metaphysical one. The mark of the beast is the blood pact, the intentional death of the soul, the striking out of salvation (mark, as in, crossing out) by entering this cabal. It's something that takes place on a spiritual level., but is more readily understood by physical actions taken to enter this blood pact, which may actually involve some sort of inoculation. There is even more to be discussed about the verse you provided, but that's going down a huge path of connecting several other verses in the Bible.

I guess it loops back into why Q says "Protect your DNA". It may actually mean, don't partake in whatever the cabal is about to convince you of because that is their ultimate goal; rob you of your salvation, and your spiritual link to God, which the mind, body and soul draws it's power from. And Revelation gives you that dire warning of what happens if you do. And for the sake of being candid, I don't believe God is saying to be anti vaccine; he's saying don't give in to things you are taught not to trust. Taking a vaccine won't stop your salvation, try as they might, but it may not be in your best interest. We are saved by allowing Jesus Christ into our hearts, believing that God is merciful upon us, and that we accept that we were born into a corrupt world, and will have to spend our entire lives fighting off dark forces. It's OUR pact with God that far transcends anything the cabal would ever dream of having.

I didn't think any of revelation is speaking in literal terms as it is presented in modern translation. Most of the Bible is not written from a literal perspective, but from a multidimensional one. I may get a bit of ignorant backlash from this, but the real discovery of the Bible is reading beyond the translation and understanding this. The history of it is actual, but it's not in the way we currently interpret it in a general sense. We have to remember it's been translated a lot, and certain phrases and documentations of events are a bit distorted from it's original transcription, because for a time, there was no universal calendar system like the Gregorian we currently use. So even our own interpretation of current time space would be quite different than when the Bible was written. We do not exist on the same dimensional plane as when it was written either; we have shifted since.

This is why I study the Geneva, NASB, NET and the apocrypha, but I also read slowly as to understand the actual choosing of language produced in the verses. I am mainly looking at the historical context, and validating/cross referencing between many different texts to get deeper insight, to help me understand God's motive with humankind and his mission to enable us to be more like Him.

So to your question, I currently interpret it as those who participate in ritual sacrifice and worship dark entities like Baphomet, that they will become afflicted by the very blood they consume and ignite, possibly enduring a sort of genetic atrophy. That makes sense in a literal context too as well as a metaphysical one. The mark of the beast is the blood pact, the intentional death of the soul, the striking out of salvation (mark, as in, crossing out) by entering this cabal. It's something that takes place on a spiritual level., but is more readily understood by physical actions taken to enter this blood pact, which may actually involve some sort of inoculation. There is even more to be discussed about the verse you provided, but that's going down a huge path of connecting several other verses in the Bible.

I guess it loops back into why Q says "Protect your DNA". It may actually mean, don't partake in whatever the cabal is about to convince you of because that is their ultimate goal; rob you of your salvation, and your spiritual link to God, which the mind, body and soul draws it's power from. And Revelation gives you that dire warning of what happens if you do. And for the sake of being candid, I don't believe God is saying to be anti vaccine; he's saying don't give in to things you are taught not to trust. Taking a vaccine won't stop your salvation, try as they might, but it may not be in your best interest.

I didn't think any of revelation is speaking in literal terms as it is presented in modern translation. Most of the Bible is not written from a literal perspective, but from a multidimensional one. I may get a bit of ignorant backlash from this, but the real discovery of the Bible is reading beyond the translation and understanding this. The history of it is actual, but it's not in the way we currently interpret it in a general sense. We have to remember it's been translated a lot, and certain phrases and documentations of events are a bit distorted from it's original transcription, because for a time, there was no universal calendar system like the Gregorian we currently use. So even our own interpretation of current time space would be quite different than when the Bible was written. We do not exist on the same dimensional plane as when it was written either; we have shifted since.

This is why I study the Geneva, NASB, NET and the apocrypha, but I also read slowly as to understand the actual choosing of language produced in the verses. I am mainly looking at the historical context, and validating/cross referencing between many different texts to get deeper insight, to help me understand God's motive with humankind and his mission to enable us to be more like Him.

So to your question, I currently interpret it as those who participate in ritual sacrifice and worship dark entities like Baphomet, that they will become afflicted by the very blood they consume, possibly enduring a sort of genetic atrophy. That makes sense in a literal context too as well as a metaphysical one. The mark of the beast is the blood pact, the intentional death of the soul, the striking out of salvation (mark, as in, crossing out) by entering this cabal. It's something that takes place on a spiritual level., but is more readily understood by physical actions taken to enter this blood pact, which may actually involve some sort of inoculation. There is even more to be discussed about the verse you provided, but that's going down a huge path of connecting several other verses in the Bible.

I guess it loops back into why Q says "Protect your DNA". It may actually mean, don't partake in whatever the cabal is about to convince you of because that is their ultimate goal; rob you of your salvation, and your spiritual link to God, which the mind, body and soul draws it's power from. And Revelation gives you that dire warning of what happens if you do. And for the sake of being candid, I don't believe God is saying to be anti vaccine; he's saying don't give in to things you are taught not to trust. Taking a vaccine won't stop your salvation, try as they might, but it may not be in your best interest.

I didn't think any of revelation is speaking in literal terms as it is presented in modern translation. Most of the Bible is not written from a literal perspective, but from a multidimensional one. I may get a bit of ignorant backlash from this, but the real discovery of the Bible is reading beyond the translation and understanding this. The history of it is actual, but it's not in the way we currently interpret it in a general sense. We have to remember it's been translated a lot, and certain phrases and documentations of events are a bit distorted from it's original transcription, because for a time, there was no universal calendar system like the Gregorian we currently use. So even our own interpretation of current time space would be quite different than when the Bible was written.

This is why I study the Geneva, NASB, NET and the apocrypha, but I also read slowly as to understand the actual choosing of language produced in the verses. I am mainly looking at the historical context, and validating/cross referencing between many different texts to get deeper insight, to help me understand God's motive with humankind and his mission to enable us to be more like Him.

So to your question, I currently interpret it as those who participate in ritual sacrifice and worship dark entities like Baphomet, that they will become afflicted by the very blood they consume, possibly enduring a sort of genetic atrophy. That makes sense in a literal context too as well as a metaphysical one. The mark of the beast is the blood pact, the intentional death of the soul, the striking out of salvation (mark, as in, crossing out) by entering this cabal. It's something that takes place on a spiritual level., but is more readily understood by physical actions taken to enter this blood pact, which may actually involve some sort of inoculation. There is even more to be discussed about the verse you provided, but that's going down a huge path of connecting several other verses in the Bible.

I guess it loops back into why Q says "Protect your DNA". It may actually mean, don't partake in whatever the cabal is about to convince you of because that is their ultimate goal; rob you of your salvation, and your spiritual link to God, which the mind, body and soul draws it's power from. And Revelation gives you that dire warning of what happens if you do. And for the sake of being candid, I don't believe God is saying to be anti vaccine; he's saying don't give in to things you are taught not to trust. Taking a vaccine won't stop your salvation, try as they might, but it may not be in your best interest.

I didn't think any of revelation is speaking in literal terms. Most of the Bible is not written from a literal perspective, but from a multidimensional one. I may get a bit of ignorant backlash from this, but the real discovery of the Bible is reading beyond the translation and understanding this. The history of it is actual, but it's not in the way we currently interpret it in a general sense. We have to remember it's been translated a lot, and certain phrases and documentations of events are a bit distorted from it's original transcription, because for a time, there was no universal calendar system like the Gregorian we currently use. So even our own interpretation of current time space would be quite different than when the Bible was written.

This is why I study the Geneva, NASB, NET and the apocrypha, but I also read slowly as to understand the actual choosing of language produced in the verses. I am mainly looking at the historical context, and validating/cross referencing between many different texts to get deeper insight, to help me understand God's motive with humankind and his mission to enable us to be more like Him.

So to your question, I currently interpret it as those who participate in ritual sacrifice and worship dark entities like Baphomet, that they will become afflicted by the very blood they consume, possibly enduring a sort of genetic atrophy. That makes sense in a literal context too as well as a metaphysical one. The mark of the beast is the blood pact, the intentional death of the soul, the striking out of salvation (mark, as in, crossing out) by entering this cabal. It's something that takes place on a spiritual level., but is more readily understood by physical actions taken to enter this blood pact, which may actually involve some sort of inoculation. There is even more to be discussed about the verse you provided, but that's going down a huge path of connecting several other verses in the Bible.

I guess it loops back into why Q says "Protect your DNA". It may actually mean, don't partake in whatever the cabal is about to convince you of because that is their ultimate goal; rob you of your salvation, and your spiritual link to God, which the mind, body and soul draws it's power from. And Revelation gives you that dire warning of what happens if you do. And for the sake of being candid, I don't believe God is saying to be anti vaccine; he's saying don't give in to things you are taught not to trust. Taking a vaccine won't stop your salvation, try as they might, but it may not be in your best interest.

I didn't think any of revelation is speaking in literal terms. Most of the Bible is not written from a literal perspective, but from a multidimensional one. I may get a bit of ignorant backlash from this, but the real discovery of the Bible is reading beyond the translation and understanding this. The history of it is actual, but it's not in the way we currently interpret it in a general sense. We have to remember it's been translated a lot, and certain phrases and documentations of events are a bit distorted from it's original transcription, because for a time, there was no universal calendar system like the Gregorian we currently use. So even our own interpretation of current time space would be quite different than when the Bible was written.

This is why I study the Geneva, NASB, NET and the apocrypha, but I also read slowly as to understand the actual choosing of language produced in the verses. I am mainly looking at the historical context, and validating/cross referencing between many different texts to get deeper insight, to help me understand God's motive with humankind and his mission to enable us to be more like Him.

So to your question, I currently interpret it as those who participate in ritual sacrifice and worship dark entities like Baphomet, that they will become afflicted by the very blood they consume, possibly enduring a sort of genetic atrophy. That makes sense in a literal context too as well as a metaphysical one. The mark of the beast is the blood pact, the intentional death of the soul, the striking out of salvation (mark, as in, crossing out) by entering this cabal. It's something that takes place on a spiritual level., but is more readily understood by physical actions taken to enter this blood pact, which may actually involve some sort of inoculation. There is even more to be discussed about the verse you provided, but that's going down a huge path of connecting several other verses in the Bible.

I guess it loops back into why Q says "Protect your DNA". It may actually mean, don't partake in whatever the cabal is about to convince you of because that is their ultimate goal; rob you of your salvation, and your physical link to God. And Revelation gives you that dire warning of what happens if you do. And for the sake of being candid, I don't believe God is saying to be anti vaccine; he's saying don't give in to things you are taught not to trust. Taking a vaccine won't stop your salvation, try as they might, but it may not be in your best interest.

I didn't think any of revelation is speaking in literal terms. Most of the Bible is not written from a literal perspective, but from a multidimensional one. I may get a bit of ignorant backlash from this, but the real discovery of the Bible is reading beyond the translation and understanding this. The history of it is actual, but it's not in the way we currently interpret it in a general sense. We have to remember it's been translated a lot, and certain phrases and documentations of events are a bit distorted from it's original transcription, because for a time, there was no universal calendar system like the Gregorian we currently use. So even our own interpretation of current time space would be quite different than when the Bible was written.

This is why I study the Geneva, NASB, NET and the apocrypha, but I also read slowly as to understand the actual choosing of language produced in the verses. I am mainly looking at the historical context, and validating/cross referencing between many different texts to get deeper insight, to help me understand God's motive with humankind and his mission to enable us to be more like Him.

So to your question, I currently interpret it as those who participate in ritual sacrifice and worship dark entities like Baphomet, that they will become afflicted by the very blood they consume, possibly enduring a sort of genetic atrophy. That makes sense in a literal context too as well as a metaphysical one. The mark of the beast is the blood pact, the intentional death of the soul, the striking out of salvation (mark, as in, crossing out) by entering this cabal. It's something that takes place on a spiritual level., but is more readily understood by physical actions taken to enter this blood pact, which may actually involve some sort of inoculation. There is even more to be discussed about the verse you provided, but that's going down a huge path of connecting several other verses in the Bible.

I guess it loops back into why Q says "Protect your DNA". It may actually mean, don't partake in whatever the cabal is about to convince you of because that is their ultimate goal; rob you of your salvation, and your physical link to God. And Revelation gives you that dire warning of what happens if you do. And for the sake of being candid, I don't believe God is saying to be anti vaccine; he's saying don't give in to things you are taught not to trust.

I didn't think any of revelation is speaking in literal terms. Most of the Bible is not written from a literal perspective, but from a multidimensional one. I may get a bit of ignorant backlash from this, but the real discovery of the Bible is reading beyond the translation and understanding this. The history of it is actual, but it's not in the way we currently interpret it in a general sense. We have to remember it's been translated a lot, and certain phrases and documentations of events are a bit distorted from it's original transcription, because for a time, there was no universal calendar system like the Gregorian we currently use. So even our own interpretation of current time space would be quite different than when the Bible was written.

This is why I study the Geneva, NASB, NET and the apocrypha, but I also read slowly as to understand the actual choosing of language produced in the verses. I am mainly looking at the historical context, and validating/cross referencing between many different texts to get deeper insight, to help me understand God's motive with humankind and his mission to enable us to be more like Him.

So to your question, I currently interpret it as those who participate in ritual sacrifice and worship dark entities like Baphomet, that they will become afflicted by the very blood they consume, possibly enduring a sort of genetic atrophy. That makes sense in a literal context too as well as a metaphysical one. The mark of the beast is the blood pact, the intentional death of the soul, the striking out of salvation (mark, as in, crossing out) by entering this cabal. It's something that takes place on a spiritual level., but is more readily understood by physical actions taken to enter this blood pact, which may actually involve some sort of inoculation. There is even more to be discussed about the verse you provided, but that's going down a huge path of connecting several other verses in the Bible.

I guess it loops back into why Q says "Protect your DNA". It may actually mean, don't partake in whatever the cabal is about to convince you of because that is their ultimate goal; rob you of your salvation, and your physical link to God. And Revelation gives you that dire warning of what happens if you do.

I didn't think any of revelation is speaking in literal terms. Most of the Bible is not written from a literal perspective, but from a multidimensional one. I may get a bit of ignorant backlash from this, but the real discovery of the Bible is reading beyond the translation and understanding this. The history of it is actual, but it's not in the way we currently interpret it in a general sense. We have to remember it's been translated a lot, and certain phrases and documentations of events are a bit distorted from it's original transcription, because for a time, there was no universal calendar system like the Gregorian we currently use. So even our own interpretation of current time space would be quite different than when the Bible was written.

This is why I study the Geneva, NASB, NET and the apocrypha, but I also read slowly as to understand the actual choosing of language produced in the verses. I am mainly looking at the historical context, and validating/cross referencing between many different texts to get deeper insight, to help me understand God's motive with humankind and his mission to enable us to be more like Him.

So to your question, I currently interpret it as those who participate in ritual sacrifice and worship dark entities like Baphomet, that they will become afflicted by the very blood they consume, possibly enduring a sort of genetic atrophy. That makes sense in a literal context too as well as a metaphysical one. The mark of the beast is the blood pact, the intentional death of the soul, the striking out of salvation (mark, as in, crossing out) by entering this cabal. It's something that takes place on a spiritual level., but is more readily understood by physical actions taken to enter this blood pact, which may actually involve some sort of inoculation. There is even more to be discussed about the verse you provided, but that's going down a huge path of connecting several other verses in the Bible.

I guess it loops back into why Q says "Protect your DNA". It may actually mean, don't partake in whatever the cabal is about to do, because that is their ultimate goal; rob you of your salvation, and your physical link to God.

I didn't think any of revelation is speaking in literal terms. Most of the Bible is not written from a literal perspective, but from a multidimensional one. I may get a bit of ignorant backlash from this, but the real discovery of the Bible is reading beyond the translation and understanding this. The history of it is actual, but it's not in the way we currently interpret it in a general sense. We have to remember it's been translated a lot, and certain phrases and documentations of events are a bit distorted from it's original transcription, because for a time, there was no universal calendar system like the Gregorian we currently use. So even our own interpretation of current time space would be quite different than when the Bible was written.

This is why I study the Geneva, NASB, NET and the apocrypha, but I also read slowly as to understand the actual choosing of language produced in the verses. I am mainly looking at the historical context, and validating/cross referencing between many different texts to get deeper insight, to help me understand God's motive with humankind and his mission to enable us to be more like Him.

So to your question, I currently interpret it as those who participate in ritual sacrifice and worship dark entities like Baphomet, that they will become afflicted by the very blood they consume, possibly enduring a sort of genetic atrophy. That makes sense in a literal context too as well as a metaphysical one. The mark of the beast is the blood pact, the intentional death of the soul, the striking out of salvation (mark, as in, crossing out) by entering this cabal. It's something that takes place on a spiritual level., but is more readily understood by physical actions taken to enter this blood pact. There is even more to be discussed about the verse you provided, but that's going down a huge path of connecting several other verses in the Bible.

I guess it loops back into why Q says "Protect your DNA". It may actually mean, don't partake in whatever the cabal is about to do, because that is their ultimate goal; rob you of your salvation, and your physical link to God.

I didn't think any of revelation is speaking in literal terms. Most of the Bible is not written from a literal perspective, but from a multidimensional one. I may get a bit of ignorant backlash from this, but the real discovery of the Bible is reading beyond the translation and understanding this. The history of it is actual, but it's not in the way we currently interpret it in a general sense. We have to remember it's been translated a lot, and certain phrases and documentations of events are a bit distorted from it's original transcription, because for a time, there was no universal calendar system like the Gregorian we currently use. So even our own interpretation of current time space would be quite different than when the Bible was written.

This is why I study the Geneva, NASB, NET and the apocrypha, but I also read slowly as to understand the actual choosing of language produced in the verses. I am mainly looking at the historical context, and validating/cross referencing between many different texts to get deeper insight, to help me understand God's motive with humankind and his mission to enable us to be more like Him.

So to your question, I currently interpret it as those who participate in ritual sacrifice and worship dark entities like Baphomet, that they will become afflicted by the very blood they consume, possibly enduring a sort of genetic atrophy. That makes sense in a literal context too as well as a metaphysical one. The mark of the beast is the blood pact, the intentional death of the soul, the striking out of salvation (mark, as in, crossing out) by entering this cabal. It's something that takes place on a spiritual level., but is more readily understood by physical actions taken to enter this blood pact.

I guess it loops back into why Q says "Protect your DNA". It may actually mean, don't partake in whatever the cabal is about to do, because that is their ultimate goal; rob you of your salvation, and your physical link to God.