Someone else has likely put these pieces together in a book somewhere, but I have not seen it. I am doing independent digs to splice it together. THESIS: Communication and software companies are public fronts for intelligence agencies, and it goes back to at least pre 1972 election Watergate setup of Nixon by CIA.

I have been piece-ing it together bit by bit. Timeline analysis provides the circumstantial evidence of something going on. But then if you overlay actions of DOJ, Intel community, Gates family, Microsoft, IBM, and AT&T from 1973-1984, you start to see the puzzle picture.

Sources used so far:

1. DOJ vs AT&T actions and filings; some evidence they were “unable to find at AT&T” certain documents they knew existed

2. AT&T involvement in Watergate and recording of Nixon admin people indicates it was CIA behind AT&T division doing it

3. Gates family direct ties to IBM people (mom, et. al) with suspected secondary ties to some AT&T people

4. Gates “got in trouble” for spoofing dialing number signals using basic audio frequency hacks on AT&T tech. Appeared to be setup for excuse to have “young Bill” meet with certain AT&T (and probably CIA) people

5. Founding date of MSFT immediately AFTER anti-trust DOJ action (and subsequent subpoenas), but not IPO’ed until 1986 AFTER 01JAN1984 (tougher SEC reporting when public) conclusion of anti-trust

6. Suspension of AT&T anti-trust action during CIA-installed Carter admin (1976 election rigged in 3 key states after voter suppression and Swine Flu scam) and resumption under Reagan, resulting in 01JAN1984 breakup https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_swine_flu_outbreak

7. Obvious parallels of monopoly on phone calls and monopoly on computer O/S for intel agency use for their own purposes, but done in “private sector”, optically NOT gov’t or CIA (standard cutout method used by British Intel Services Operations since 1751 in US and in India before that)

Key parallel on MSFT IPO delay and GOOG IPO delay. Why would Google not IPO and ride tech boom after being founded in 1998? Because they had to wait for MSFT anti-trust to conclude in Nov 2001 because of what they were hiding. Then they IPO’ed in 2004 after risk of documents being seized was gone.

Someone else has likely put these pieces together in a book somewhere, but I have not seen it. I am doing independent digs to splice it together. THESIS: Communication and software companies are public fronts for intelligence agencies, and it goes back to at least pre 1972 election Watergate setup of Nixon by CIA.

I have been piece-ing it together bit by bit. Timeline analysis provides the circumstantial evidence of something going on. But then if you overlay actions of DOJ, Intel community, Gates family, Microsoft, IBM, and AT&T from 1973-1984, you start to see the puzzle picture.

Sources used so far:

1. DOJ vs AT&T actions and filings; some evidence they were “unable to find at AT&T” certain documents they knew existed

2. AT&T involvement in Watergate and recording of Nixon admin people indicates it was CIA behind AT&T division doing it

3. Gates family direct ties to IBM people (mom, et. al) with suspected secondary ties to some AT&T people

4. Gates “got in trouble” for spoofing dialing number signals using basic audio frequency hacks on AT&T tech. Appeared to be setup for excuse to have “young Bill” meet with certain AT&T (and probably CIA) people

5. Founding date of MSFT immediately AFTER anti-trust DOJ action (and subsequent subpoenas), but not IPO’ed until 1986 AFTER 01JAN1984 (tougher SEC reporting when public)

6. Suspension of AT&T anti-trust action during CIA-installed Carter admin (1976 election rigged in 3 key states after voter suppression and Swine Flu scam) and resumption under Reagan, resulting in 01JAN1984 breakup https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_swine_flu_outbreak

7. Obvious parallels of monopoly on phone calls and monopoly on computer O/S for intel agency use for their own purposes, but done in “private sector”, optically NOT gov’t or CIA (standard cutout method used by British Intel Services Operations since 1751 in US and in India before that)

Key parallel on MSFT IPO delay and GOOG IPO delay. Why would Google not IPO and ride tech boom after being founded in 1998? Because they had to wait for MSFT anti-trust to conclude in Nov 2001 because of what they were hiding. Then they IPO’ed in 2004 after risk of documents being seized was gone.

Someone else has likely put these pieces together in a book somewhere, but I have not seen it. I am doing independent digs to splice it together. THESIS: Communication and software companies are public fronts for intelligence agencies, and it goes back to at least pre 1972 election Watergate setup of Nixon by CIA.

I have been piece-ing it together bit by bit. Timeline analysis provides the circumstantial evidence of something going on. But then if you overlay actions of DOJ, Intel community, Gates family, Microsoft, IBM, and AT&T from 1973-1984, you start to see the puzzle picture.

Sources used so far:

1. DOJ vs AT&T actions and filings; some evidence they were “unable to find at AT&T” certain documents they knew existed

2. AT&T involvement in Watergate and recording of Nixon admin people indicates it was CIA behind AT&T division doing it

3. Gates family direct ties to IBM people (mom, et. al) with suspected secondary ties to some AT&T people

4. Gates “got in trouble” for spoofing dialing number signals using basic audio frequency hacks on AT&T tech. Appeared to be setup for excuse to have “young Bill” meet with certain AT&T (and probably CIA) people

5. Founding date of MSFT immediately AFTER anti-trust DOJ action (and subsequent subpoenas), but not IPO’ed until 1986 AFTER 01JAN1984 (tougher SEC reporting when public)

6. Suspension of AT&T anti-trust action during CIA-installed Carter admin (1976 election rigged in 3 key states after voter suppression and Swine Flu scam) and resumption under Reagan, resulting in 01JAN1984 breakup https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_swine_flu_outbreak

7. Obvious parallels of monopoly on phone calls and monopoly on computer O/S for intel agency use for their own purposes, but done in “private sector”, optically NOT gov’t or CIA (standard cutout method used by British Intel Services Operations since 1751 in US and in India before that)

Key parallel on MSFT IPO delay and GOOG IPO delay. Why would Google not IPO and ride tech boom after being founded in 1998? Because they had to wait for MSFT anti-trust to conclude in Nov 2001 because of what they were hiding. Then they IPO’ed in 2004.

Someone else has likely put these pieces together in a book somewhere, but I have not seen it. I am doing independent digs to splice it together. THESIS: Communication and software companies are public fronts for intelligence agencies, and it goes back to at least pre 1972 election Watergate setup of Nixon by CIA.

I have been piece-ing it together bit by bit. Timeline analysis provides the circumstantial evidence of something going on. But then if you overlay actions of DOJ, Intel community, Gates family, Microsoft, IBM, and AT&T from 1973-1984, you start to see the puzzle picture.

Sources used so far:

1. DOJ vs AT&T actions and filings; some evidence they were “unable to find at AT&T” certain documents they knew existed

2. AT&T involvement in Watergate and recording of Nixon admin people indicates it was CIA behind AT&T division doing it

3. Gates family direct ties to IBM people (mom, et. al) with suspected secondary ties to some AT&T people

4. Gates “got in trouble” for spoofing dialing number signals using basic audio frequency hacks on AT&T tech. Appeared to be setup for excuse to have “young Bill” meet with certain AT&T (and probably CIA) people

5. Founding date of MSFT immediately AFTER anti-trust DOJ action (and subsequent subpoenas), but not IPO’ed until 1986 AFTER 01JAN1984 (tougher SEC reporting when public)

6. Suspension of AT&T anti-trust action during CIA-installed Carter admin (1976 election rigged in 3 key states after voter suppression and Swine Flu scam) and resumption under Reagan, resulting in 01JAN1984 breakup https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_swine_flu_outbreak

7. Obvious parallels of monopoly on phone calls and monopoly on computer O/S for intel agency use for their own purposes, but done in “private sector”, optically NOT gov’t or CIA (standard cutout method used by British Intel Services Operations since 1751 in US and in India before that)

Someone else has likely put these pieces together in a book somewhere, but I have not seen it. I am doing independent digs to splice it together. THESIS: Communication and software companies are public fronts for intelligence agencies, and it goes back to at least pre 1972 election Watergate setup of Nixon by CIA.

I have been piece-ing it together bit by bit. Timeline analysis provides the circumstantial evidence of something going on. But then if you overlay actions of DOJ, Intel community, Gates family, Microsoft, IBM, and AT&T from 1973-1984, you start to see the puzzle picture.

Sources used so far:

1. DOJ vs AT&T actions and filings; some evidence they were “unable to find at AT&T” certain documents they knew existed

2. AT&T involvement in Watergate and recording of Nixon admin people indicates it was CIA behind AT&T division doing it

3. Gates family direct ties to IBM people (mom, et. al) with suspected secondary ties to some AT&T people

4. Gates “got in trouble” for spoofing dialing number signals using basic audio frequency hacks on AT&T tech. Appeared to be setup for excuse to have “young Bill” meet with certain AT&T (and probably CIA) people

5. Founding date of MSFT immediately AFTER anti-trust DOJ action (and subsequent subpoenas)

6. Suspension of AT&T anti-trust action during CIA-installed Carter admin (1976 election rigged in 3 key states after voter suppression and Swine Flu scam) and resumption under Reagan, resulting in 01JAN1984 breakup https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_swine_flu_outbreak

7. Obvious parallels of monopoly on phone calls and monopoly on computer O/S for intel agency use for their own purposes, but done in “private sector”, optically NOT gov’t or CIA (standard cutout method used by British Intel Services Operations since 1751 in US and in India before that)

Someone else has likely put these pieces together in a book somewhere, but I have not seen it. I am doing independent digs to splice it together. THESIS: Communication and software companies are public fronts for intelligence agencies, and it goes back to at least pre 1972 election Watergate setup of Nixon by CIA.

I have been piece-ing it together bit by bit. Timeline analysis provides the circumstantial evidence of something going on. But then if you overlay actions of DOJ, Intel community, Gates family, Microsoft, IBM, and AT&T from 1973-1984, you start to see the puzzle picture.

Sources used so far:

1. DOJ vs AT&T actions and filings; some evidence they were “unable to find at AT&T” certain documents they knew existed

2. AT&T involvement in Watergate and recording of Nixon admin people indicates it was CIA behind AT&T division doing it

3. Gates family direct ties to IBM people (mom, et. al) with suspected secondary ties to some AT&T people

4. Gates “got in trouble” for spoofing dialing number signals using basic audio frequency hacks on AT&T tech. Appeared to be setup for excuse to have “young Bill” meet with certain AT&T (and probably CIA) people

5. Founding date of MSFT immediately AFTER anti-trust DOJ action (and subsequent subpoenas)

6. Suspension of AT&T anti-trust during CIA-installed Carter admin (1976 election rigged in 3 key states after voter suppression and Swine Flu scam) and resumption under Reagan https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_swine_flu_outbreak

7. Obvious parallels of monopoly on phone calls and monopoly on computer O/S for intel agency use for their own purposes, but done in “private sector”, optically NOT gov’t or CIA (standard cutout method used by British Intel Services Operations since 1751 in US and in India before that)

Someone else has likely put these pieces together in a book somewhere, but I have not seen it. I am doing independent digs to splice it together. THESIS: Communication and software companies are public fronts for intelligence agencies, and it goes back to at least pre 1972 election Watergate setup of Nixon by CIA.

I have been piece-ing it together bit by bit. Timeline analysis provides the circumstantial evidence of something going on. But then if you overlay actions of DOJ, Intel community, Gates family, Microsoft, IBM, and AT&T from 1973-1984, you start to see the puzzle picture.

Sources used so far:

1. DOJ vs AT&T actions and filings; some evidence they were “unable to find at AT&T” certain documents they knew existed

2. AT&T involvement in Watergate and recording of Nixon admin people indicates it was CIA behind AT&T division doing it

3. Gates family ties to IBM people (mom, et. al) with secondary ties to some AT&T people

4. Gates “got in trouble” for spoofing dialing number signals using basic audio frequency hacks on AT&T tech. Appeared to be setup for excuse to have “young Bill” meet with certain AT&T (and probably CIA) people

5. Founding date of MSFT immediately AFTER anti-trust DOJ action (and subsequent subpoenas)

6. Suspension of AT&T anti-trust during CIA-installed Carter admin (1976 election rigged in 3 key states after voter suppression and Swine Flu scam) and resumption under Reagan https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_swine_flu_outbreak

7. Obvious parallels of monopoly on phone calls and monopoly on computer O/S for intel agency use for their own purposes, but done in “private sector”, optically NOT gov’t or CIA (standard cutout method used by British Intel Services Operations since 1751 in US and in India before that)

Someone else has likely put these pieces together in a book somewhere, but I have not seen it. I am doing independent digs to splice it together. THESIS: Communication and software companies are public fronts for intelligence agencies, and it goes back to at least pre 1972 election Watergate setup of Nixon by CIA.

I have been piece-ing it together bit by bit. Timeline analysis provides the circumstantial evidence of something going on. But then if you overlay actions of DOJ, Intel community, Gates family, Microsoft, IBM, and AT&T from 1973-1984, you start to see the puzzle picture.

Sources used so far:

1. DOJ vs AT&T actions and filings; some evidence they were “unable to find at AT&T” certain documents they knew existed

2. AT&T involvement in Watergate and recording of Nixon admin people indicates it was CIA behind AT&T division doing it

3. Gates family ties to IBM people (mom, et. al) with secondary ties to some AT&T people

4. Gates “got in trouble” for spoofing dialing number signals using basic audio frequency hacks on AT&T tech. Appeared to be setup for excuse to have “young Bill” meet with certain AT&T (and probably CIA) people

5. Founding date of MSFT immediately AFTER anti-trust DOJ action (and subsequent subpoenas)

6. Suspension of AT&T anti-trust during CIA-installed Carter admin (1976 election rigged in 3 key states after voter suppression and Bird Flu scam) and resumption under Reagan

7. Obvious parallels of monopoly on phone calls and monopoly on computer O/S for intel agency use for their own purposes, but done in “private sector”, optically NOT gov’t or CIA (standard cutout method used by British Intel Services Operations since 1751 in US and in India before that)